岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 2650-2660.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0130CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0130

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法

赖丰文1,刘松玉2, 3,蔡国军4,鲁泰山2,李洪江2,段伟5   

  1. 1. 福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350116;2. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 211189; 3. 南京现代综合交通实验室,江苏 南京 210004;4. 安徽建筑大学 土木工程学院,安徽 合肥 230601; 5. 太原理工大学 土木工程学院,山西 太原 030024
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-10 接受日期:2025-05-29 出版日期:2025-08-11 发布日期:2025-08-17
  • 通讯作者: 刘松玉,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事原位测试技术、特殊地基与路基稳定等研究。E-mail: liusy@seu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:赖丰文,男,1992年生,博士,副研究员,硕士生导师,主要从事土-结构相互作用、岩土原位测试等研究。E-mail: laifengwen@fzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家杰出青年科学基金(No. 42225206);国家自然科学基金(No. 52408356,No. 42472349,No. 52308341);福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(No. JAT231002)。

An analytical approach to determine wall deflections of a deep excavation based on in-situ piezocone penetration test

LAI Feng-wen1, LIU Song-yu2, 3, CAI Guo-jun4, LU Tai-shan2, LI Hong-jiang2, DUAN Wei5   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 3. Nanjing Modern Multimodal Transportation Laboratory, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210004, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China; 5. College of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2025-02-10 Accepted:2025-05-29 Online:2025-08-11 Published:2025-08-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (42225206), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52408356, 42472349, 52308341) and the Young Teachers’ Education and Research Project of Fujian Province (JAT231002).

摘要: 弹性地基梁模型常被用于基坑围护结构变形计算,但现有模型大多忽略土体刚度硬化特征;且计算参数高度依赖于室内单元试验,其取样扰动带来的误差不可避免。提出了可以考虑土压力非极限状态和土体刚度硬化的修正弹性地基梁模型,进一步关联孔压静力触探(piezocone penetration test,CPTU)原位测试参数与模型计算参数,建立了基于CPTU原位测试的基坑围护结构侧向变形计算方法。通过与离心机试验结果对比,验证了所提计算方法的合理性与准确性。随后,将所提计算方法应用至太湖冲湖积相软土基坑工程,发现基于CPTU测试参数的计算结果和现场监测值吻合良好;基于室内单元试验的计算结果可知,取样扰动使土体刚度参数降低而高估了墙体变形,说明了基于CPTU原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法的工程适用性。最后,应用所提计算方法,探讨了开挖深度、土体杨氏模量、围护结构刚度和内支撑刚度对基坑围护结构最大变形的影响。

关键词: 基坑, 墙体侧向变形, 孔压静力触探(CPTU), 土体刚度硬化, 弹性地基梁模型

Abstract: Although elastic beam-spring models are commonly employed to predict wall deflections in deep excavations, most existing models neglect the stiffness hardening behavior of soil. Moreover, the determination of model parameters heavily relies on laboratory tests, along with the inevitable errors due to sampling disturbance. To address these limitations, this study introduces an enhanced elastic beam-spring model that incorporates non-limit state earth pressure and soil stiffness hardening. A novel CPTU-based analytical approach is then proposed to estimate wall deflections in deep excavations by correlating in-situ piezocone penetration test (CPTU) parameters with the model inputs. The validity and accuracy of the proposed approach are confirmed through comparison with previous centrifuge test data. The proposed approach is further applied to a deep excavation project in the soft soil deposits of Taihu Lake, where the CPTU-based predictions show good agreement with field measurements. In contrast, solutions derived from laboratory tests overestimate the wall deflections, likely due to underestimated soil stiffness caused by sampling disturbance. This discrepancy underscores the practical advantages of the proposed CPTU-based approach. Finally, the influence of excavation depth, Young’s modulus of soil, stiffness of retaining structures, and strut stiffness on maximum wall deflections is explored through the proposed approach.

Key words: deep excavation, wall deflection, piezocone penetration test (CPTU), soil stiffness hardening, elastic beam-spring model

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 金国龙, 李鸿桥, 谢雄耀, . 圆形地连墙分载法受力计算理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 81-91.
[2] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[3] 任连伟, 王书彪, 孔纲强, 杨权威, 邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 573-581.
[4] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[5] 李涛, 舒佳军, 王彦龙, 陈前. 基于模态分解方法的深基坑支护桩水平变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 496-506.
[6] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[7] 易顺, 陈健, 潘家军, 王艳丽, 徐晗, 刘春鹏, . 内撑式基坑围护结构水平变形的表征函数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 568-578.
[8] 肖荣军, 马威, 李锋, 袁丽云. 一种深基坑排桩支护结构内力位移矩阵分析法 解答及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 579-595.
[9] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[10] 薛秀丽, 刘治珩, 曾超峰, 白 宁, 陈宏波. 开挖前抽水条件下基坑围挡两侧非极限土压力计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1699-1708.
[11] 雷国平, 苏栋, 程马遥, 刘慧芬, 张维, . 基于被动区土弹簧刚度降低过程的基坑围护结构计算增量法及软化p-y 曲线[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 797-808.
[12] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[13] 张治国, 毛敏东, 王卫东, PAN Y T, 吴钟腾, . 降雨影响下基坑开挖施工对邻近基桩变形响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 27-49.
[14] 张坤勇, 张梦, 孙斌, 李福东, 简永洲, . 考虑时空效应的软土狭长型深基坑地连墙变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2389-2399.
[15] 陈保国, 贾曾潘. 近接建筑荷载作用下阳角型深基坑最佳支撑位置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2400-2408.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!