岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 23-34.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1032

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于数据挖掘的土−水特征曲线演化规律研究

陈勇1, 2,苏剑2,曹玲1, 2,王力2,王世梅1, 2   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 三峡大学 土木与建筑学院,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-08 修回日期:2022-04-11 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-03
  • 通讯作者: 曹玲,女,1979年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事非饱和土裂隙与细观结构研究。E-mail: 10346058@qq.com E-mail:cyonger@126.com
  • 作者简介:陈勇,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事非饱和土的力学特性及边坡稳定分析研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金区域发展联合基金重点项目(No.U21A2031)

Evolution law of the soil-water characteristic curve based on data mining method

CHEN Yong1, 2, SU Jian2, CAO Ling1, 2, WANG li2, WANG Shi-mei1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering & Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2021-07-08 Revised:2022-04-11 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Joint Funds of NSFC (U21A2031).

摘要: 土−水特征曲线是非饱和土持水性能和水气运移规律的重要表征,由于其测试过程繁杂、影响因素众多,很难通过系列试验和数学模型全面表达。为探索土的类型和物理状态对土−水特征曲线的影响,以国内外大量试验数据为基础,以反映其形态的3个特征值(进气值、减湿率、残余含水率)为对象,采用数据分析统计方法揭示不同赋存条件对特征值的作用规律,采用机器学习方法探究影响因素的敏感性。研究结果表明:土体的物质组成(颗粒级配、粒径尺度、塑性指数)及赋存状态(密实程度、饱和含水率、干湿循环作用、环境温度)是影响其持水性能的常见分析指标,各影响因素对3个特征值的影响特征既有巨大差异也有相互联系,敏感性成果表明代表黏粒含量的塑性指数和反映密实程度的干密度是影响土体持水性能的最主导因素,给出的特征值分布范围考虑了两个主导因素的影响,具有较强的代表性和借鉴意义。

关键词: 非饱和土, 土?水特征曲线, 数据挖掘, 影响机制, 敏感性分析

Abstract: The soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) is an important characterization of the water-holding performance and water-vapor transport law of unsaturated soil. Due to its complicated testing process and many influencing factors, it is difficult to fully express it through a series of tests and mathematical models. The aim of this study is to explore the influences of soil type and physical state on SWCC. The abundant test data from worldwide research are collected as the database, and three characteristic values of SWCC (air-entry value, dehumidification rate and residual volumetric water content) are selected as the analytic target. Then, some data analyses are adopted to reveal the influence and sensitivity of different occurrence conditions on the characteristic values, and machine learning methods are employed to analyze the sensitivity. In the database,the material composition (particle gradation, particle size, plasticity index) and occurrence state (compactness, saturated water content, dry-wet cycle and ambient temperature) of the soil are common indicators that affect its water holding capacity. The influence mechanism of above factors presents some great differences but also obvious interrelation. The results of sensitivity analysis indicates that the plasticity index that reflects the clay content and the dry density that represents compactness) are two dominant factors influencing the water retention capacity of unsaturated soils. The distribution ranges of three characteristic values are also provided with considering the influences of two dominant factors, and can present most of test results and guide the engineering application.

Key words: unsaturated soils, soil-water characteristic curve, data mining, influence mechanism, sensitivity analysis

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[4] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[5] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[6] 赖汉江, 刘润明, 陈志波, 崔明娟, . 粒径效应对大豆粗脲酶固化砂土效果的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 25-32.
[7] 叶云雪, 易博文, 刘小文, 吴珺华, 洪本根, . 脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2351-2361.
[8] 冯世进, 徐熠, 杨俊毅, 郑奇腾, 张晓磊, . 基于集对-组合赋权的填埋场失稳风险评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2129-2139.
[9] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
[10] 彭俊国, 黄宇豪. 非饱和边坡中锚托板锚固尺寸的新算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[11] 张思奇, 裴华富, 谭道远, 朱鸿鹄, . 单、双孔隙结构非饱和黏土孔隙分布变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 353-363.
[12] 曹建军, 胡斌, 王泽祺, 李京, . 基于分数阶积分的软弱夹层蠕变损伤模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 454-464.
[13] 陈可, 王琛, 梁发云, 汪中卫, . 考虑水力滞后与变形耦合的非饱和土持水曲线模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3694-3704.
[14] 马纪元, 程国强, 李霞颖, 杨凌雪, 李琦, 马晶, 陈博文, 杨川枫, 张瑶, 李凤洋, 余涛, 虎亭, 许宗红, 钟屹岩, . CO2多层注入下盖层密闭性影响因素研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3447-3460.
[15] 胡江, 李星, . 深挖方膨胀土边坡时空变形特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3071-3080.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!