岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 3416-3425.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0041

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

交通荷载下加筋土桥台工作性能试验研究

王裘申1, 2, 徐超1, 2,张振1, 2,沈盼盼3,吴伟成1, 2,张逍1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 3. 上海勘测设计研究院有限公司,上海 200335
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-08 修回日期:2022-03-29 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-05
  • 作者简介:王裘申,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事土工合成材料加筋土桥台及其他相关结构的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技部重点专项(No.2016YFE0105800);国家自然科学基金(No.41772284,No.42002270)。

Experimental study on service performance of reinforced soil abutment subjected to traffic loads

WANG Qiu-shen1, 2, XU Chao1, 2, ZHANG Zhen1, 2, SHEN Pan-pan3, WU Wei-cheng1, 2, ZHANG Xiao1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Shanghai Investigation, Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200335, China
  • Received:2022-01-08 Revised:2022-03-29 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2023-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (2016YFE0105800) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772284, 42002270).

摘要: 加筋土桥台因其具有良好的复合体特性,被广泛应用于各项工程建设,研究它在实际工程条件下的工作性能对其设计和推广具有重要意义。加筋土桥台在服役过程中主要承受交通荷载作用,通过室内大比例缩尺模型的加速应力试验,研究交通荷载条件下加筋土桥台的工作性能,考虑加筋间距与筋材刚度的影响,综合分析了不同交通荷载等级和循环次数下桥台变形与筋材应变的变化规律。研究结果表明,加筋土桥台在交通荷载作用下整体变形随循环次数趋于收敛,其顶部沉降、面板水平位移与筋材应变均远小于规范给出的阈值;各变形值随加载时间呈阶梯状发展,不同条件下变形收敛趋势有所差异;增大筋材刚度和减小加筋层间距有利于控制桥台的变形,筋材刚度对变形的控制作用要优于加筋间距;交通荷载作用下面板水平应变与顶部竖向应变并不满足2倍关系,二者之间的定量关系有待进一步研究。

关键词: 加筋土桥台, 交通荷载, 模型试验, 加速应力法, 工作性能

Abstract: Reinforced soil abutment is widely used in various engineering constructions because of the good composite performance. The study of its working performance under actual conditions is of great significance to design and popularization. Reinforced soil abutment is mainly subjected to traffic loads in service. In this study, an accelerated stress test of large-scale model was carried out to investigate the working performance of reinforced soil abutment under traffic loads, and to analyze the deformation characteristics of the abutment and the strain of the reinforcements under different loading levers and numbers of loading cycles considering some factors such as spacing and stiffness of the reinforcement. The results indicate that the overall deformation of the reinforced soil abutment tends to converge under traffic loads. The settlement at the top of the abutment, the lateral displacement of the facing and the strain of the reinforcements are much less than the threshold suggested by the current specification. The deformation exhibits stepped variations over loading time and the convergent tendency differs under various conditions. Increasing the stiffness of reinforcement and reducing the spacing of reinforcement are beneficial to improve the ability of deformation resistance of the abutment, while the stiffness of reinforcement plays a more important role in deformation control. In addition, the quantitative relationship between the maximum lateral strain at the facing and the maximum vertical strain at the top of the abutment is not two times, and the quantitative relationship between the two needs to be further studied.

Key words: reinforced soil abutment, traffic loads, model test, accelerated stress method, service performance

中图分类号: TU472
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[11] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!