岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 206-216.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0228

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑扰动影响的土体小应变硬化模型参数试验研究及其在基坑工程中的应用

白时雨1, 2,王文军2,谢新宇3, 4,朱德良5   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 工程师学院,浙江 杭州 310015;2. 浙大 宁波理工学院,浙江 宁波 315100;3. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心, 浙江 杭州 310058;4. 浙江大学 温州研究院,浙江 温州 325036 ;5. 武夷学院,福建 武夷山 354300
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-28 接受日期:2022-06-02 出版日期:2023-01-16 发布日期:2023-01-13
  • 通讯作者: 王文军,男,1975年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土与地下工程方向的教学科研工作。E-mail: wwjcumt@nbt.edu.cn E-mail:953420179@qq.com
  • 作者简介:白时雨,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事软黏土力学以及基坑工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    闽北山地地质灾害防治福建省高校工程研究中心开发基金课题(No. WYERC2020-1);建设工程施工数字化管理平台的构建与示范应用 (No. 2021-K-092)

Experimental study on HS-small model parameters of soil considering disturbance and its application in foundation pit engineering

BAI Shi-yu1, 2, WANG Wen-jun2, XIE Xin-yu3, 4, ZHU De-liang5   

  1. 1. Polytechnic Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China; 2. Ningbo Tech. University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China; 3. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 4. Institute of Wenzhou, Zhejiang University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 354300, China; 5. Wuyi University, Wuyishan, Fujian 354300, China
  • Received:2022-02-28 Accepted:2022-06-02 Online:2023-01-16 Published:2023-01-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Project of Fujian University Engineering Research Center Development Fund for the Prevention and Control of Mountain Geological Hazards in Northern Fujian (WYERC2020-1) and the Construction and Demonstration Application of Digital Management Platform for Construction Engineering (2021-K-092).

摘要: 天然结构性土体容易受到各类施工扰动,导致土体物理力学性质改变,进而影响工程稳定、变形以及邻近环境。针对宁波两种典型土体,分别对原状土和轻、重扰动土以及重塑土开展了三轴试验及一维压缩试验,分析了扰动度对小应变硬化模型(HS-small model,简称HSS模型)主要参数的影响规律,并将其应用于宁波某基坑工程,利用Plaxis3D分析了考虑周边土体扰动影响的坑后土体水平位移变化。研究结果表明,扰动会使土体的强度及刚度参数降低。对于淤泥质黏土,轻扰动试样的参考切线模量Erefoed、参考割线模量Eref50及参考加卸载模量Erefur值分别降低14%、10%、2%,重扰动试样三参数分别降低43%、14%、15%,粉质黏土三参数也呈现相似降低趋势。在考虑土体扰动影响的情况下,基坑周边两个测斜孔的最大水平位移值分别增大13%、15%,更加接近实测值。研究结果可为小应变硬化模型的参数取值以及考虑扰动影响的基坑工程分析计算提供指导。

关键词: 结构性, 扰动, 小应变硬化模型(HSS模型), 刚度参数, 基坑开挖

Abstract:

Natural structural soil is susceptible to various types of construction disturbance. The disturbance results in the change of the physical and mechanical properties of soil, which in turn the engineering stability, deformation and adjacent environment. In this paper, triaxial tests and one-dimensional compression tests were carried out on undisturbed soil, lightly disturbed soil, heavily disturbed soil and remolded soil of two typical soils in Ningbo. The influence of disturbance degree on the main parameters of HSS model was analyzed, the influence laws were applied to a foundation pit project in Ningbo City. The horizontal displacement of the foundation pit was analyzed with Plaxis3D considering the influence of surrounding soil disturbance. The results show that disturbance has adverse effects on the strength and stiffness of soil. For mucky clay, the reference tangent modulus Erefoed, reference secant modulus Eref50 and reference loading/unloading modulus Erefur of lightly disturbed samples are respectively reduced by 14%, 10% and 2%, the above parameters of the heavily disturbed sample are reduced by 43%, 14% and 15% respectively, and similar decreasing laws can also observed in silty clay. Considering the influence of soil disturbance, the maximum calculated horizontal displacement of the two inclined holes around the foundation pit increases by 13% and 15% respectively, which is closer to the measured values. The research results can provide a guidance for HSS model parameter selection and foundation pit engineering analysis and calculation considering disturbance effect.

Key words: structural, disturbance, HS-small model (HSS model), stiffness parameters, excavation of foundation pit

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 李培楠, 刘学, 戴泽余, 翟一欣, 张弛, 寇晓勇, 范杰, 甄亮, 王长虹, . 曲线顶管底幕法水下沉船打捞顶推力计算模型与施工扰动分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 403-418.
[2] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[3] 王长虹, 蔡德雍, 胡子轩, 杨天笑. 扰动状态下束浆挤扩桩抗拔机制与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[4] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[5] 雷舒羽, 曹净, 刘海明, 张兴文, 张柠锐. 工程碱性环境中泥炭土体结构性损伤试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2135-2146.
[6] 李林, 张等红, 张淼, 顾晓强, 徐龙飞, . 考虑水-力耦合的桩-非饱和黄土接触面荷载传递模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
[7] 任连伟, 王书彪, 孔纲强, 杨权威, 邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 573-581.
[8] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[9] 杨松, 王俊光, 韦忠跟, 辛天宇, 梁冰, 王立轩, 任凌冉. 衰减振荡扰动下砂岩蠕变特性与模型初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3485-3500.
[10] 张胜, 徐鼎平, 石汉明, 吴小刚, 易明尚, . 峰前循环扰动下的深埋花岗岩特征参数演化规律与损伤变量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 73-87.
[11] 王番, 郅彬, 刘恩龙, 王小婵, 邓博团, 李金华, 张辉, . 考虑局部胶结破损热力学行为的结构性黄土二元介质本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 97-109.
[12] 黄叶宁, 邓华锋, 李建林, 王明洋, 张景昱, 周书桓, 徐鹏飞, . 静载和动力扰动联合作用下砂岩时滞性破坏试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 213-224.
[13] 王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[14] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
[15] 祝恩阳, 陈玉堃. 考虑加载速率影响的结构性软黏土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 63-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!