岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 603-611.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1156

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

边坡失稳三类能量突变判据的统一性

华成亚,姚磊华   

  1. 中国地质大学(北京) 工程技术学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-26 接受日期:2022-12-30 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-19
  • 通讯作者: 姚磊华,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: leihuayao@163.com E-mail:247093301@qq.com
  • 作者简介:华成亚,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41807228)

Unity of three types of energy catastrophe criteria for slope failure

HUA Cheng-ya, YAO Lei-hua   

  1. School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2022-07-26 Accepted:2022-12-30 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41807228).

摘要: 强度折减法失稳判据研究是边坡稳定性分析领域的热点问题。特征点位移突变判据、塑性区贯通判据和计算程序不收敛判据这3类常用失稳判据被认为分别对应于重力势能降突变判据、耗散能增量突变判据和动能增量突变判据这3类能量突变判据。为了统一上述3类能量突变判据,基于最小势能原理,提出了强度折减法新的失稳判据-变分值判据。推导了数值模型总势能二阶变分值计算公式,发现了一种变分施加方式,编写了变分值计算程序,给出了基于变分值正负判断模型稳定与否的流程。通过典型边坡算例,验证了变分值判据和3类能量突变判据的统一性。通过改变数值模型的网格密度、边坡角度和边坡高度等典型参数,讨论变分值判据和3类能量突变判据统一性的一般性。结果表明:变分值判据计算结果与3类能量突变判据计算结果接近,彼此的相对误差小于5%。变分值判据统一了3类能量突变判据,为3类能量突变判据的统一性提供了力学解释。

关键词: 边坡, 强度折减法, 失稳判据, 能量突变判据, 最小势能原理

Abstract: The research on the failure criterion for the strength reduction method (SRM) is a hot issue in the field of slope stability analysis. Three types of commonly used failure criteria, namely, the marked displacement mutation criterion, the plastic zone penetration criterion and the calculation program nonconvergence criterion are considered in correspondence with three types of energy catastrophe criteria, namely, the energy catastrophe criterion for gravity potential loss, the catastrophe criterion of dissipated energy increment and the catastrophe criterion of kinetic energy increment, respectively. To unify the three types of energy catastrophe criteria, a new failure criterion-variational value criterion for the SRM was proposed based on the principle of minimum potential energy. The calculation formulas of the second-order variational value of the total potential energy of a numerical model were derived. A method for applying variation was found. A variational value calculation procedure was written. Then, the process of judging the stability or instability of the model based on the positive or negative of the variational value was given. The unity of the variational value criterion and the three types of energy catastrophe criteria was verified through a typical slope example. The generality of the unity of the variational value criterion and the three types of energy catastrophe criteria was discussed by changing the typical parameters of the numerical model, such as mesh density, slope angle and slope height. It is shown that the results calculated by the variational value criterion are close to those calculated by the three types of energy catastrophe criteria, with the relative error of less than 5%. The variational value criterion unifies the three types of energy catastrophe criteria, and provides a mechanical explanation for the unity of the three types of energy catastrophe criteria.

Key words: slope, strength reduction method, failure criterion, energy catastrophe criteria, principle of minimum potential energy

中图分类号: TU 433
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[3] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[4] 江沂键, 李焕焕, 朱大勇, 凌道盛, . 考虑推力线位置的边坡线性规划模型与极限平衡上下限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[5] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[6] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[7] 孙文超, 王君豪, 徐文杰, 董晓阳, 任禾, 王洪兵, 张学杰, 王恒威, . 基于物质点法的高速公路弃渣场稳定性及 灾害动力学分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 991-1000.
[8] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[9] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[10] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[11] 邓志平, 钟敏, 蒋水华, 潘敏, 黄劲松, . 土体参数非平稳随机场模拟及三维边坡高效可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3243-3252.
[12] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[13] 宋丽, 许领, 李杭州, 李伟, . 考虑中间主应力影响的非饱和黄土边坡抗滑桩间距研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 517-524.
[14] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[15] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!