岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 3501-3511.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1912

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

硅藻土的微观结构特征及其对物理性质的影响

徐倚晴1, 2,张先伟1,王港1, 2,刘新宇1, 3,高浩东1, 4   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 华中科技大学 土木与水利工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;4. 武汉科技大学 城市建设学院,湖北 武汉 430065
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-06 接受日期:2023-04-07 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2023-12-21
  • 通讯作者: 张先伟,男,1982年生,博士,研究员,主要从事特殊土土力学基础研究及工程应用。E-mail: xwzhang@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:xuyiqing20@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:徐倚晴,女,1999年生,硕士,助理工程师,主要从事特殊土土力学等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42372313)

Microscopic structure and its effects on physical properties of diatomaceous soil

XU Yi-qing1, 2, ZHANG Xian-wei1, WANG Gang1, 2, LIU Xin-yu1, 3, GAO Hao-dong1, 4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 4. School of Urban Construction, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430065, China
  • Received:2022-12-06 Accepted:2023-04-07 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2023-12-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42372313).

摘要: 硅藻土通常形成于湖泊或海洋环境,是一种由黏土矿物和硅藻残骸组成的天然沉积土。硅藻的轻质与多孔性质使硅藻土的物理特性与不含硅藻的细粒土有较大差异,如低密度、大孔隙比、高含水率的特点,其性质指标不能用常规土力学经验公式确定,当前对这类特殊土的研究尚属探索阶段。为了系统认识硅藻土的物理性质,配置不同硅藻含量的混合土,测试粒径组成、相对密度、比表面积、液塑限等指标,调查了硅藻对物理性质的影响,通过扫描电镜试验解析了微观机制。结果表明:土中的硅藻含量增加会引起粉粒成分增加、相对密度降低、同时比表面积与阳离子交换量也会提高;无论孔隙流体含盐量高低,硅藻土的液塑限均随着硅藻含量的增加而增加,并且塑性指数保持几乎不变。微观结构调查发现硅藻土的特殊物理性质主要受控于硅藻的大体积的中空内腔以及较强的储水能力。试验过程中还发现,尽管硅藻土的液塑限值很高,硅藻含量80%及以上的硅藻土却表现为塑性较弱或几乎没有塑性的粉土,说明液塑限值并不能很好地反映硅藻土的塑性性质,目前通用的细粒土分类标准对硅藻土分类是不合理的。该研究可以为硅藻土的岩土工程性质研究提供数据参考和理论支撑。

关键词: 硅藻, 硅藻土, 物理特性, 微观结构, 液塑限, 塑性

Abstract: Diatomaceous soil is a kind of natural sedimentary soil that formed in lacustrine or marine environment, mainly composed of clay minerals and diatom remains. The light weight and high porosity of diatom results in a significant difference of physical properties between diatomaceous soil and common clayey soil without diatom, such as low density, high porosity and high water content. These physical properties cannot be predicted by empirical equations of conventional soil mechanics and still need to be explored. This study measured typical physical indices of particle size composition, specific gravity, specific surface area and Atterberg limits of diatom-kaolin mixtures at different diatom contents to enhance systematical comprehension of physical properties of diatomaceous soil. Also, the scanning electron microscope tests were performed to reveal the microscopic mechanism of these physical properties of diatomaceous soil. The results indicate that increasing diatom content causes increases in silt fraction, specific surface area and cation exchange capacity, and a decrease in specific gravity. As the diatom content increases, the Atterberg limits show ascending tendency with pore fluid being NaCl solutions of different concentrations. Despite both the liquid and plastic limits increase, the plasticity index remains almost unchanged. The microscopic investigation suggests that the abovementioned physical properties of diatomaceous soil mainly depend on the large inner cells and high water-retention capacity of diatoms. The tests also show that diatom-kaolin mixtures with diatom content higher than 80% possess low plasticity or nearly non-plastic during the test despite of the high Atterberg limits of pure diatom. This phenomenon means that the Atterberg limits cannot reflect the plasticity of diatomaceous soil, and the current classification methods for fine-grained soils according to Atterberg limits are inappropriate for diatomaceous soil. This study can provide data reference and theoretical support for research on engineering behaviors of diatomaceous soil.

Key words: diatom, diatomaceous soil, physical properties, microstructure, Atterberg limits, plasticity

中图分类号: TU411.2
[1] 郅彬, 魏园钧, 王番, 张茜, 刘存利, 任会明, . 冻融循环作用下含Na2SO4盐原状黄土宏观强度与微观结构关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[2] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[3] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[4] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[5] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[6] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[7] 徐卫卫, 谢遵党, 傅中志, 米占宽, . 粗粒土真三轴试验南水模型研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2559-2572.
[8] 富海鹰, 钟雨薇, 王孝文, 吴博涵, 袁冉, . 基于次加载面理论的砂土临界状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1788-1798.
[9] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[10] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[11] 贺元源, 彭绮澜, 王力, 王世梅, 佴磊, 徐燕, 吕岩, 陈勇, 张先伟, . 基于多微观手段的季冻区草炭土孔隙特征和渗透性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 110-122.
[12] 肖劲卿, 温松诚, 郭源, . 基于单孔冲刷测试的黏性土抗侵蚀性及各向异性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 187-198.
[13] 丁旭升, 张凌凯, 樊培培, . 干湿冻融循环条件下重塑性黄土的强度劣化规律及非线性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 324-336.
[14] 王丽艳, 蒋飞, 庄海洋, 王炳辉, 张雷, 李明, . 考虑水化期影响的橡胶−钢渣填料动力特性与微观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 53-62.
[15] 程鑫, 江文豪, 黄啸, 李爽, 王应富, 李江山, . 自硬化竖向屏障材料在Cr(Ⅵ)污染液作用下工程性能及微观结构演化[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 225-238.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!