岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 489-501.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0241

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究

王通1, 2,刘先峰1, 2, 3,袁胜洋1, 2,蒋关鲁1, 2,胡金山4,邵珠杰4,田士军4   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031; 3. 新疆工程学院 土木工程学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830023;4. 中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司,陕西 西安 710043
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-27 接受日期:2023-04-23 出版日期:2024-02-11 发布日期:2024-02-07
  • 通讯作者: 刘先峰,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事环境岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: Xianfengliu@swjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王通,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事艰险山区边坡灾害防治方面的研究工作。wangtonglw@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中铁第一勘察设计院集团有限公司科研项目(No.20-06)。

Large-scale shaking table test on the seismic response of dip and anti-dip layered fractured structural slopes

WANG Tong1, 2, LIU Xian-feng1, 2, 3, YUAN Sheng-yang1, 2, JIANG Guan-lu1, 2, HU Jin-shan4, SHAO Zhu-jie4, TIAN Shi-jun4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Institute of Engineering, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830023, China; 4. China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710043, China
  • Received:2023-02-27 Accepted:2023-04-23 Online:2024-02-11 Published:2024-02-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project of China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd. (20-06).

摘要: 西南艰险山区分布着大量的不同倾向的层状碎裂结构斜坡,地震作用下极易发生崩塌、滑坡等灾害,对在建的川藏铁路造成严重威胁。通过大型振动台模型试验,研究了强震条件下顺倾、反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡的动力响应、失稳破坏模式以及能量传递规律。试验结果表明:反倾斜坡的抗震性能显著优于顺倾斜坡;顺倾斜坡的破坏模式主要为拉裂−剪切−隆起−滑移型破坏,反倾斜坡的破坏模式主要为拉伸−弯曲−倾倒−崩塌型破坏;反倾斜坡的自振频率高于顺倾斜坡,顺倾斜坡的自振频率随震级的增加而逐渐降低,而反倾斜坡的自振频率在地震波幅值为0.4g~0.7g时出现反复震荡现象;顺倾斜坡存在明显的高程放大效应和趋表效应,反倾斜坡存在高程放大效应,其内部的加速度响应大于坡表。边际谱识别显示:顺倾斜坡的边际谱幅值(peak of marginal spectrum amplitude,简称PMSA)突变在坡腰上部最显著,说明该位置附近地震波的能量损失最大,反映出顺倾斜坡在坡腰上部附近形成了滑动破坏面;反倾斜坡的PMSA在坡肩处降低得最为显著,反映出坡肩部位损伤最为严重,易发生局部崩塌破坏。分析结果与试验现象能够较好地吻合,进一步揭示了不同结构类型层状碎裂结构斜坡在强震作用下的动力响应与失稳破坏模式,为川藏铁路的安全建设提供了依据。

关键词: 顺倾斜坡;反倾斜坡;振动台试验;地震加速度峰值(peak ground acceleration, 简称PGA)放大系数;破坏模式;损伤识别

Abstract: In the challenging and perilous mountainous regions of Southwest China, there are numerous layered and fractured rock slopes with varying inclinations. These slopes are prone to disasters such as collapses and landslides during earthquakes, posing a serious threat to the ongoing construction of the Sichuan-Xizang Railway. To address this issue, large-scale shaking table model tests were conducted to study the dynamic response, failure modes of instability, and energy transfer characteristics of dip and anti-dip layered slopes under strong earthquake conditions. The test results reveal that the anti-seismic performance of anti-dip slopes is significantly better than that of dip slopes. The failure mode of dip slopes primarily involves tensile cracking, shearing, uplift, and slip failure. On the other hand, the failure mode of anti-dip slopes mainly consists of tensile, bending, tilting, and collapsing failure. The natural vibration frequency of anti-dip slopes is higher compared to dip slopes. As the earthquake magnitude increases, the natural frequency of dip slopes gradually decreases. However, the natural frequency of anti-dip slopes exhibits repeated oscillations within the range of seismic amplitudes of from 0.4g to 0.7g. Dip slopes exhibit clear “elevation amplification effect” and “tend-surface effect,” while anti-dip slopes demonstrate the “elevation amplification effect.” Furthermore, the internal acceleration response is greater than that of the slope surface. Marginal spectrum identification indicates that the most significant change in peak of marginal spectrum amplitude (PMSA) for dip slopes occurs at the upper part of the slope waist. This suggests that the energy loss of seismic waves near this position is the largest, indicating the formation of a sliding failure surface near the upper part of the slope waist. For anti-dip slopes, the PMSA decreases most significantly at the slope shoulder, indicating severe damage and a propensity for local collapse in this area. The analysis results are in good agreement with the experimental observations, providing further insights into the dynamic response and instability failure modes of different structural types of layered slopes under strong earthquakes. These findings serve as a basis for ensuring the safe construction of the Sichuan-Xizang Railway.

Key words: dip slope, anti-dip slope, shaking table test, peak ground acceleration (PGA) amplification coefficient, failure mode, damage identification

中图分类号: TU45
[1] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[2] 梁金平, 李小瑞, 荆浩勇, 侯公羽, 苏占东, 张明磊, . 厚壁圆筒围岩试件的屈服机制及卸荷变形破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2676-2686.
[3] 蔡玉娟, 蔡静森, 任少文, 刘锴, 陈劲, 李漪, . 岩溶区非均质岩组岩体力学参数快速估计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2749-2762.
[4] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[5] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[6] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[7] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[8] 许江, 李艾峰, 彭守建, 陈奕安, 汤杨, 侯亚彬, 罗利威, . 基于广义应力松弛特性的岩石时效性数值模拟方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2943-2954.
[9] 侯小强, 杨芮, 李瑞冬, 樊小鹏, 郑佳乐, 侯宝胜, . 卵石土混合体随机生成方法与宏细观力学演化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2967-2979.
[10] 张弛, 邓龙传, 庄欠伟, 李晓昭, 王秋平, 乔梁, . 基于试验和数值模拟的滚刀旋转破岩受力和效率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2995-3006.
[11] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[12] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[13] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[14] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[15] 金解放, 熊慧颖, 肖莜丰, 彭孝旺. 岩石超声波对三维地应力的敏感性及传播衰减特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 183-194.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!