岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 769-776.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1192

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

反滤压重及埋深对深厚覆盖层允许坡降影响研究

张会豪1,邱子源1,金伟1, 2,张丹2,罗玉龙1   

  1. 1. 河海大学 水利水电学院,江苏 南京 210024;2. 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,四川 成都 610072
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-07 接受日期:2023-11-05 出版日期:2024-03-11 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 罗玉龙,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土体渗流及渗透稳定性方面的研究。E-mail: lyl8766@hhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张会豪,男,1997年生,硕士,主要从事岩土体渗流及渗透稳定性方面的研究。E-mail: 506988023@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2017YFC1502603);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51679070);中国科学院青海盐湖研究所基础研究青年创新交叉团队(No.islJCTD-2022-2);湖南省水利科技项目(No.XSKJ2021000-35,No.XSKJ2022068-37)。

Influence of weights and buried depth on the allowable hydraulic gradient of deep overburden foundation

ZHANG Hui-hao1, QIU Zi-yuan1, JIN Wei1, 2, ZHANG Dan1, 2, LUO Yu-long1   

  1. 1. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 2. Power China Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China
  • Received:2023-08-07 Accepted:2023-11-05 Online:2024-03-11 Published:2024-03-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1502603), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51679070), the Basic Research Youth Innovation Intersection Team of Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Sciences (islJCTD-2022-2) and Hunan Water Conservancy Science and Technology (XSKJ2021000-35, XSKJ2022068-37).

摘要: 反滤压重及埋深均会影响土体允许坡降,但目前尚无法量化这些影响。量化反滤压重及埋深的影响是合理确定允许坡降,科学评价坝基渗流安全的关键。采用轴向应力模拟反滤压重及埋深的作用,针对泸定水电站下游坝基③-1层,开展了③-1层级配包络线在不同轴向应力条件下的渗透试验,量化了反滤压重及埋深对③-1层临界坡降的影响。结果表明:随着轴向应力的增大,③-1层上包线和平均线土体的临界坡降呈线性增加趋势,而下包线土体的临界坡降受轴向应力影响很小。基于试验结果,量化了反滤压重和埋深对③-1层允许坡降的贡献,建立了随轴向应力变化的③-1层土体允许坡降公式,提出了可考虑反滤压重措施及土体埋深影响的允许坡降建议取值方法,该方法可供后续类似工程借鉴采用。

关键词: 深厚覆盖层, 允许坡降, 反滤压重, 埋深, 应力状态

Abstract: Both weights and buried depth can influence the allowable hydraulic gradient of soil, but these effects have not been quantified. Quantification of these influences is the key to determine the allowable hydraulic gradient and to evaluate seepage safety. In this study, the axial stress was adopted to simulate the effects of weights and buried depth. A list of seepage tests under different axial stresses was performed on soil ③-1 of Luding Hydropower Station, and the influences of weights and buried depth on the critical hydraulic gradient were quantified. The results indicate that the critical hydraulic gradients of the upper and middle envelopes of particle size distribution linearly increase with the increase in axial stress, while that of the lower envelope is not influenced by the axial stress. The influences of weights and buried depth on the allowable hydraulic gradient were quantified based on the experimental results, and a formula describing the variation of the allowable hydraulic gradient with axial stress was proposed, and then a method determining the allowable hydraulic gradient which can consider the influences of weights and buried depth was established, and it can provide a reference for the similar project.

Key words: deep overburden foundation, allowable hydraulic gradient, weights, buried depth, stress state

中图分类号: TU413
[1] 马滨, 王丽艳, 吉文炜, 吴晗, 蔡晓光, 王炳辉, . 强震下返包胎面加筋挡土墙结构抗震性能模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2792-2804.
[2] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[3] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[4] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
[5] 邹德高, 屈永倩, 孔宪京, 陈楷, 刘京茂, 龚瑾, . 超深覆盖层上高沥青心墙坝防渗墙受力状态的精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1826-1836.
[6] 张鸿朋, 马芹永, 黄坤, 马冬冬, 姚兆明, 张发, . 冻结砂不同应力路径三轴试验强度和变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1477-1486.
[7] 杨阳, 田英辉, 张春会, 王荣, 王智超, 王乐, . 砂土海床中海底管道贯入阻力演化特征及细观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1001-1008.
[8] 罗玉龙, 张兴杰, 张海彬, 盛金昌, 詹美礼, 王惠民, 何淑媛, . 深厚覆盖层地基潜蚀研究综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3094-3106.
[9] 罗斌玉, 叶义成, 胡南燕, 李鹏程, 陈常钊, . 压剪复合受载下矿柱应力状态的Mohr圆分析 与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 63-73.
[10] 徐日庆, 蒋佳琪, 冯苏阳, 鞠露莹, . 一种旋转塑性势面模型及非关联塑性流动法则[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1474-1482.
[11] 姜景山, 左永振, 程展林, 潘家军, 张超, 韦有信, . 应力状态对粗粒料力学特性影响的大型真三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3563-3572.
[12] 余挺, 邵磊. 含软弱土层的深厚河床覆盖层坝基动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 267-277.
[13] 朱俊高, 蒋明杰, 陆阳洋, 吉恩跃, 罗学浩, . 应力状态对粗颗粒土静止侧压力系数影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 827-833.
[14] 王璞, 王成虎, 杨汝华, 侯正阳, 王洪, . 基于应力多边形与震源机制解的 深部岩体应力状态预测方法初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4486-4496.
[15] 陈四利,李艳宇,周 辉,胡大伟,. 基于极限应力比的三参数双τ2强度准则及其应用[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1948-1954.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!