岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 835-845.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0485

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于改进贝叶斯更新方法的边坡参数概率反分析及可靠度评估

胡鸿鹏1,蒋水华1,陈东2,黄劲松1,周创兵1   

  1. 1. 南昌大学 工程建设学院,江西 南昌 330031;2. 江西省天然气集团有限公司管道分公司,江西 南昌 330096
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-19 接受日期:2023-06-12 出版日期:2024-03-11 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 蒋水华,男,1987年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程可靠度与风险分析方面的研究。E-mail: sjiangaa@ncu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:胡鸿鹏,男,1999年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程参数反分析及可靠度评估方面的研究。E-mail: 2436036120@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.52222905,No.52179103,No.42272326);江西省自然科学基金项目(No.20232ACB204031,No.20224ACB204019)

Probabilistic back analysis of slope parameters and reliability evaluation using improved Bayesian updating method

HU Hong-peng1, JIANG Shui-hua1, CHEN Dong2, HUANG Jin-song1, ZHOU Chuang-bing1   

  1. 1. School of Infrastructure Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330031, China; 2. Jiangxi Provincial Natural Gas Group Co., Ltd., Pipeline Branch Nanchang, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330096, China
  • Received:2023-04-19 Accepted:2023-06-12 Online:2024-03-11 Published:2024-03-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52222905, 52179103, 42272326) and Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (20232ACB204031, 20224ACB204019).

摘要: 某一特定场地的岩土力学参数在地质作用下普遍呈现固有的不确定性,融合现场观测数据进行概率反分析可有效缩减这一不确定性。虽然基于子集模拟的贝叶斯更新(Bayesian Updating with Subset simulation,简称BUS)方法可以将等量场地信息的高维概率反分析问题转化为等效的结构可靠度问题,但是当现场观测数据增多时,构建的似然函数值会变得非常小,甚至低于计算机浮点运算精度,会严重影响概率反分析计算效率与精度。为此,提出了一种基于并联系统可靠度分析的改进BUS方法,从基于乔列斯基分解的中点法出发,将接受率低的总失效区域分解为多个接受率高的子失效区域,从而避免因融合大量现场观测数据引起的“维度灾难”问题,实现对边坡岩土力学参数的准确概率反分析。最后,通过一不排水饱和黏土边坡案例验证了提出方法的有效性,结果表明提出的方法能够融合大量钻孔数据和边坡服役状态等观测信息高效进行岩土力学参数概率反分析及边坡可靠度评估,为高维空间变异参数概率反分析和边坡可靠度评估提供了一种有效的工具。

关键词: 边坡, 空间变异性, 似然函数分解, 贝叶斯更新, 概率反分析, 可靠度评估

Abstract: The geomechanical parameters for a particular site exhibit inherent uncertainties due to geological processes, and probabilistic back analysis incorporating field observation data can effectively reduce these uncertainties. Although the BUS (Bayesian Updating with Subset simulation) method can transform the high-dimensional probabilistic back analysis problem with the equality site information into an equivalent structural reliability problem, the value of the constructed likelihood function can become extremely small or even lower than the computer floating-point operation accuracy as the field observation data increase, which might seriously affect the computational efficiency and accuracy of probabilistic back analysis. To this end, this paper proposes an improved BUS method based on the parallel system reliability analysis. Starting from the Cholesky decomposition-based midpoint method, the total failure domain with a low acceptance rate is decomposed into several sub-failure domains with a high acceptance rate so as to avoid the “curse of dimensionality” arising from the integration of a large amount of field observation data, and to achieve accurate back analysis of the geomechanical parameters of slopes. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is validated through a case study of an undrained saturated clay slope. The results show that the proposed method can integrate a large number of borehole data and the observation information of slope service state for efficient probabilistic back analysis of geomechanical parameters and slope reliability evaluation with reasonable accuracy. The proposed method provides an effective tool for high-dimensional probabilistic back analysis of spatially variable soil parameters and slope reliability evaluation.

Key words: slope, spatial variability, decomposition of likelihood function, Bayesian updating, probabilistic back analysis, reliability evaluation

中图分类号: O 319.56
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[3] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[4] 江沂键, 李焕焕, 朱大勇, 凌道盛, . 考虑推力线位置的边坡线性规划模型与极限平衡上下限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[5] 陶袁钦, 潘孙珏徐, 孙宏磊, 聂艳侠, . 基于多元概率分布的土体硬化模型参数预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1392-1408.
[6] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[7] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[8] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[9] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[10] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[11] 邓志平, 钟敏, 蒋水华, 潘敏, 黄劲松, . 土体参数非平稳随机场模拟及三维边坡高效可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3243-3252.
[12] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[13] 宋丽, 许领, 李杭州, 李伟, . 考虑中间主应力影响的非饱和黄土边坡抗滑桩间距研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 517-524.
[14] 林滨强, 章德生, 简文彬, 豆红强, 王浩, 樊秀峰, . 风驱雨作用下植被斜坡稳定性响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2765-2774.
[15] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!