岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1309-1320.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0705

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

荷载作用下砂土边坡-管道相互作用试验研究

喻文昭1,朱鸿鹄1,王德洋1,谢天铖1,裴华富2,施斌1   

  1. 1. 南京大学 地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210023; 2. 大连理工大学 海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室,辽宁 大连 116024
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-01 接受日期:2023-08-07 出版日期:2024-05-11 发布日期:2024-05-07
  • 通讯作者: 朱鸿鹄,男,1979年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质工程、岩土力学方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail: zhh@nju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:喻文昭,女,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事埋地管道光纤监测方面的研究。E-mail: yuwenzhao@smail.nju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家杰出青年科学基金项目(No. 42225702);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 42077235);江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目(No. KYCX22_ 0162)。

Experimental study of sandy slope-pipe interaction under loading

YU Wen-zhao1, ZHU Hong-hu1, WANG De-yang1, XIE Tian-cheng1, PEI Hua-fu2, SHI Bin1   

  1. 1. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China
  • Received:2023-06-01 Accepted:2023-08-07 Online:2024-05-11 Published:2024-05-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (42225702), the General Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077235) and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX22_0162).

摘要: 随着我国西气东输、南水北调等重大工程的快速推进,埋地管道不可避免地会穿越高陡山区,并受到区域地形地貌的影响,而关于边坡-管道相互作用机制的认识还相对滞后,相关研究亟需加强。基于分布式光纤应变传感(distributed strain sensing,简称DSS)、粒子图像测速(particle image velocimetry,简称PIV)技术,开展加载工况下砂土边坡-管道相互作用的室内模型试验,探究了临坡地基极限承载力的影响因素,并研究了不同坡角下边坡土体变形破坏机制及埋地管道的结构响应特征。研究结果表明:(1)临坡地基经历了弹性压密、局部剪切和整体破坏3个阶段,并呈现不对称楔形破坏模式;(2)临坡地基极限承载力随着坡角的增大呈减小趋势,同一坡角下埋地管道的存在会降低临坡地基极限承载力;(3)管道对边坡滑裂面形成路径的影响程度随着坡角的增大而变大;(4)在荷载作用下埋地管道横截面环向应变呈“椭圆化”分布,据此提出了管周界面土抗力的简化计算模型与椭圆度计算式。相关结论对边坡-管道系统的变形控制与结构设计有一定的参考和借鉴意义。

关键词: 埋地管道, 光频域反射(OFDR), 边坡-管道相互作用, 土抗力, 模型试验

Abstract: With the rapid development of key projects in China, such as West-to-East Gas Transmission and South-to-North Water Diversion, buried pipelines will inevitably pass through the mountainous area and are affected by regional topography and landforms. However, the interaction mechanism between slope and pipelines is still relatively unclear. In this study, the model tests on sandy slope-pipe interaction under loading are carried out in laboratory based on distributed strain sensing (DSS) and particle image velocimetry (PIV) technologies. The factors influencing the bearing capacity of the foundation are investigated. The failure characteristics of the slope and the structural responses of the buried pipeline are also explored. The research results show that: (1) The slope foundation has undergone three stages: elastic compaction, local shear and overall destruction. The foundation shows asymmetrical wedge-shaped failure pattern. (2) With the increase in slope angle, the ultimate bearing capacity of the foundation decreases. Under the same slope angle, the presence of pipeline reduces the ultimate bearing capacity of the slope foundation. (3) With the increase in slope angle, the influence of the pipeline on the slope failure mechanism increases. (4) Under the loading of the slope, the circumferential strain in the cross-section of the buried pipe is “elliptically” distributed, and an ellipticity calculation formula and a simplified calculation model of the soil resistance around the pipe circumference are proposed. This study can provide a reference for the deformation control and structural design of buried pipelines in sandy slopes.

Key words: buried pipeline, optical frequency domain reflectometry (OFDR), slope-pipe interaction, soil resistance, model test

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 孙旻洋, 王忠瑾, 谢新宇, 张日红, 娄扬, 朱大勇, . 饱和黏土中能源群桩热力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 382-390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!