岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1412-1422.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0887

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

陡倾结构金属矿山岩移规律的模型试验研究

刘秀敏1, 2,范凯1, 2,王月1, 2,王文中3,陈从新1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 武钢资源集团金山店矿业有限公司,湖北 黄石 435116
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-21 接受日期:2023-08-15 出版日期:2024-05-11 发布日期:2024-05-07
  • 作者简介:刘秀敏,女,1981年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事金属矿开采、岩体工程稳定性控制等方面的研究工作。E-mail:xmliu@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(No. 42002292)。

Model test research on ground movement law of steeply dipping discontinuities in metal mines

LIU Xiu-min1, 2, FAN Kai1, 2, WANG Yue1, 2, WANG Wen-zhong3, CHEN Cong-xing1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Jinshandian Iron Mine of Wuhan Iron and Steel (Group) Company, Huangshi, Hubei 435116, China
  • Received:2023-06-21 Accepted:2023-08-15 Online:2024-05-11 Published:2024-05-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (42002292).

摘要: 陡倾地质结构金属矿床大部分形成于构造断裂带,崩落法开采会产生显著的岩层移动现象。以湖北黄石的金山店铁矿典型地质剖面为基础,构建地质结构模型。通过缩尺物理模型试验,研究陡倾地质结构对崩落法采矿岩层移动的影响规律。研究结果表明,受陡倾地质结构的影响,采空区岩层移动可分为缓慢增长、快速增长与地表塌陷破坏3个阶段,其中上盘岩移范围远大于下盘,上盘以倾倒变形破坏为主,下盘以剪切滑移破坏为主;采空区顶板岩层一方面不断崩落填充采空区控制岩移,另一方面形成冒落拱,以拱脚抵制上下盘陡倾岩层朝向采空区移动;当顶板崩落至地表后冒落拱的支撑作用消失,近采空区的上盘岩层发生倾倒折断塌陷,下盘岩层发生剪切滑移塌陷。

关键词: 金属矿山开采, 模型试验, 陡倾地质结构, 岩层移动, 冒落拱

Abstract: Most metal deposits with the steeply dipping geological structure are typically formed in structural fault zones, and caving mining often result in significant ground movement. In a study conducted at the Jinshandian Iron Mine in Huangshi, Hubei Province, a geological structure model is constructed based on the typical geological profile. The influence of steeply dipping geological structure on the ground movement law in caving mining was investigated by means of scaled-down physical model tests. The results show that, influenced by the steeply dipping geological structure, the ground movement in the goaf can be divided into three stages: slow growth, rapid growth and surface subsidence damage, in which the ground movement of the hanging wall is much larger than that of the footwall. Specifically, the hanging wall is primarily characterized by toppling deformation and failure, and the footwall is dominated by shear-slip failure. The roof strata in the goaf continuously collapse and fill the goaf to control the ground movement, forming a falling arch to resist the movement of the rock layer on the hanging wall and footwall towards the extraction area by its arch foot. However, when the roof falls to the surface, the supporting role of the caving arch diminishes, leading to toppling fracture collapses in the hanging wall near the goaf and shear-slip collapses in the footwall.

Key words: metal mining, model test, steeply dipping geological structure, ground movement, caving arch

中图分类号: TD 325
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[11] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 孙旻洋, 王忠瑾, 谢新宇, 张日红, 娄扬, 朱大勇, . 饱和黏土中能源群桩热力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 382-390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!