岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1551-1559.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0025

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震序列作用下液化场地条件影响研究

李金宇,王伟,王浩宇,杨研科,徐凯放,张晓庆,熊文   

  1. 1. 防灾科技学院 地质工程学院,河北 廊坊 065201; 2. 河北省地震灾害防御与风险评价重点实验室,河北 廊坊 065201
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-04 接受日期:2024-02-24 出版日期:2024-05-11 发布日期:2024-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 王伟,男,1982年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土地震工程、防震减灾研究。E-mail: wwwiem@163.com
  • 作者简介:李金宇,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土地震工程研究。E-mail: 21661228@st.cidp.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(No. XH23062A);中央高校基本科研业务费研究生科技创新基金资助(No. ZY20230307)

Influence of liquefaction site conditions under the action of earthquake sequences

LI Jin-yu, WANG Wei, WANG Hao-yu, YANG Yan-ke, XU Kai-fang, ZHANG Xiao-qing, XIONG Wen   

  1. 1.School of Geological Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Langfang, Hebei 065201, China 2.Hebei Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Prevention and Risk Assessment, Langfang, Hebei 065201, China
  • Received:2024-01-04 Accepted:2024-02-24 Online:2024-05-11 Published:2024-05-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science for Earthquake Resilience (XH23062A) and the Science and Technology Innovation Program for Postgraduate Students in IDP Subsidized by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZY20230307).

摘要: 砂土液化前后场地条件的变化研究对于改进液化判别方法具有重要意义。基于美国加利福尼亚州野生动物园强震动观测竖井台阵资料,采用互相关分析和傅里叶谱比方法,研究了布劳雷强震动序列作用下台阵场地液化前后等效剪切波速和卓越频率的变化特征。强震作用下孔压监测结果表明,场地液化层的超孔隙水压力已经达到临界液化状态,并在震后迅速消散,但是在地表没有发生喷水冒砂现象。超孔隙水压力的累积导致竖井台阵不同观测位置之间的剪切波传播时间发生延迟,台阵场地卓越频率在砂土液化过程中发生显著下降。在孔压消散之后,剪切波传播时间和场地卓越频率在4 d内恢复正常。这一现象对于基于液化之后场地原位测试资料建立液化判据具有重要参考价值。

关键词: 砂土液化, 地震序列, 互相关分析, 时间延迟, 剪切波速, 卓越周期

Abstract: Studying the changes in site conditions before and after sand liquefaction is crucial for improving liquefaction discrimination methods. In a study utilizing the strong seismic observation data from the borehole array at the California Wildlife Park in the United States, we investigated the variation characteristics of the equivalent shear wave velocity and dominant frequency of the array site before and after liquefaction, triggered by the Brawley strong earthquake sequences. This analysis employed cross-correlation analysis and the Fourier spectral ratio method. The monitoring results of pore pressure under strong earthquake action indicate that the excess pore water pressure in the liquefied layer has reached the critical liquefaction state and rapidly dissipates after the earthquake, without any visible sand boil on the surface. The building up of excess pore water pressure causes a delay in the propagation time of shear waves among different observation positions of the borehole array. Furthermore, the dominant frequency of the array site evidently decreases during the sand liquefaction process. After the dissipation of pore pressure, the propagation time of shear waves and the dominant frequency of the site return to normal state within 4 days. This observed phenomenon holds significant reference value for establishing liquefaction criteria based on in-situ testing data at the site following liquefaction.

Key words: sand liquefaction, earthquake sequence, cross correlation analysis, time delay, shear wave velocity, predominant frequency

中图分类号: TU 435
[1] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[2] 袁近远, 苏安双, 陈龙伟, 许成顺, 王淼, 袁晓铭, 张思宇, . 基于剪切波速的砾性土液化概率计算的中国方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3378-3387.
[3] 张锋, 唐康为, 尹思琪, 冯德成, 陈志国, . 冻融粉质黏土的剪切波速与动态回弹模量及其转换关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 221-233.
[4] 杨洋, 孙锐, . 基于剪切波速的液化可能性等级评估表法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 634-644.
[5] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[6] 吴宏, 叶治, 张宇亭, 刘华北, . 穿越不同密实度饱和砂土地层的盾构隧道地震响应三维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1204-1216.
[7] 王维铭, 陈龙伟, 郭婷婷, 汪云龙, 凌贤长, . 基于中国砂土液化数据库的标准贯入试验液化 判别方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 279-288.
[8] 董青, 周正华, 苏杰, 李小军, 郝冰, . 基于对数动骨架的可考虑液化大变形本构[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1903-1910.
[9] 杨志勇, 王勇, 孔令伟, 桂彬, 陈楷文, . 基于剪切波速的海底含气沉积物卸荷扰动 与样品质量评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3687-3694.
[10] 陈国兴, 丁杰发, 方怡, 彭艳菊, 李小军, . 场地类别分类方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3509-3522.
[11] 吴小锋, 汪玉冰, 朱斌, . 地震序列作用下干砂与饱和砂地基动力响应 离心模拟试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3385-3394.
[12] 杨洋, 孙锐, 陈卓识, 袁晓铭. 基于土层常规参数的剪切波速液化概率计算公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2755-2764.
[13] 陈卓识, 袁晓铭, 孙锐, 王克. 土层剪切波速不确定性对场地刚性判断的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2748-2754.
[14] 魏 星, 张 昭, 王 刚, 张建民, . 饱和砂土液化后大变形机制的离散元细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1596-1602.
[15] 朱雨萌, 吴 琪, 陈国兴, . 基于颗粒接触状态理论的砂-粉混合料 剪切波速试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1457-1464.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!