岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1743-1754.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1549

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于总安全系数法的系统锚杆支护承载能力试验研究

肖明清1, 2,徐晨1, 2,崔岚3, 4,盛谦3, 4, 陈健3, 4,谢壁婷1, 2,晏庆明5   

  1. 1. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430063;2. 水下隧道技术国家地方联合工程研究中心,湖北 武汉 430063; 3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 4. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;5. 中国地质大学(武汉)海洋学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-16 接受日期:2023-11-30 出版日期:2024-06-19 发布日期:2024-06-20
  • 作者简介:肖明清,男,1971年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面的设计研究工作。E-mail: tsyxmq@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国铁建股份有限公司科研计划(2021-B18);铁四院科技计划(2021K038);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52279118);中国科学院青年创新促进会项目(No.2023344)。

Experimental study on bearing capacity of systematic bolt support based on total safety factor method

XIAO Ming-qing1, 2, XU Chen1, 2, CUI Lan3, 4, SHENG Qian3, 4, CHEN Jian3, 4, XIE Bi-ting1, 2, YAN Qing-ming5   

  1. 1. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430063, China; 2. National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Underwater Tunnel Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430063, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 5. College of Marine Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2023-10-16 Accepted:2023-11-30 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Research Program of China Railway Construction Corporation (2021-B18), the Science and Technology Program of the Fourth Railway Academy (2021K038), the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52279118) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2023344).

摘要: 鉴于隧道现行规范缺乏系统锚杆支护的承载能力分析方法,总安全系数法提出了锚−岩承载拱的荷载结构模型与承载力计算方法,在理论上实现了锚杆的量化设计,但缺少试验验证。基于此,从结构试验角度研制了大型隧道结构模型试验系统,开展了毛洞与不同间距系统锚杆支护下的锚−岩承载拱结构承载试验。通过监测围岩内部应力−应变、隧道位移与锚杆应变,分析了围岩与锚杆材料的破坏状态与破坏荷载,研究了锚−岩承载拱变形与受力特征、锚杆轴力分布。对比分析了模型试验的结构承载力与总安全系数法理论下锚−岩承载拱的计算承载力。研究结果表明:锚杆能有效地与围岩协同承载,显著增加围岩的侧限力,提高围岩抗压强度与承载能力;试验得到的锚−岩承载拱承载能力与理论计算结果较为吻合,表明了总安全系数法的锚−岩承载拱计算模型是合理的,并具有合适的安全性。

关键词: 锚?岩承载拱, 模型试验, 承载能力, 总安全系数法

Abstract: In view of the absence of bearing capacity analysis method for systematic bolt in the current specifications of tunnels, the total safety factor method proposes a load structure model of bolt-rock bearing arch. This method theoretically enables the quantitative design of bolts but lacks experimental verification. To address this, this paper develops a large-scale tunnel structure model experimental system from a structural experimental perspective. It conducts bearing experiments on bolt-rock bearing arch structures in unsupported tunnel and bolted tunnels with different spacings. By monitoring the stress and strain in the surrounding rock mass, tunnel displacement and bolt strain, the failure state and failure load of surrounding rock and bolt are analyzed. The deformation and force characteristics of the bolt-rock bearing arch and the distribution of bolt forces are investigated. The structural bearing capacity of the model experiment and the calculated bearing capacity of the bolt-rock bearing arch under the total safety factor method theory were compared and analyzed. The results show that the bolts can bear the load together with the surrounding rock mass, effectively increasing the confining stress of the surrounding rock mass and enhancing the compressive strength and bearing capacity. The experimental bearing capacity of the bolt-rock bearing arch is consistent with theoretical calculation results, proving the rationality of the bolt-rock bearing arch theory of the total safety factor method. This method is both safe and conservative.

Key words: bolt-rock bearing arch, model experiments, bearing capacity, total safety factor method

中图分类号: U25
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!