岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1813-1823.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0673

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环三轴试验加载频率和压实度对重塑砂土液化行为的影响

THUY Do Van1,TIEP Pham Duc1,HIEU Nguyen Van1,THANG Pham Cao2   

  1. 1. 勒奎东技术大学 特殊工程技术研究所,越南 河内;2. 越南航空科技协会,越南 河内
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-29 接受日期:2023-08-28 出版日期:2024-06-19 发布日期:2024-06-20
  • 通讯作者: HIEU Nguyen Van,男,1983年生,博士,讲师,主要从事材料、岩土工程和交通建设方面的研究。E-mail: hieunv@lqdtu.edu.vn
  • 作者简介:THUY Do Van,男,1989年生,硕士,讲师,主要从事材料、岩土工程和交通建设方面的研究。E-mail: thuydv@lqdtu.edu.vn

Influence of loading frequency and relative compaction on liquefaction behavior of reconstituted sand in cyclic triaxial tests

THUY Do Van1, TIEP Pham Duc1, HIEU Nguyen Van1, THANG Pham Cao2   

  1. 1. Institute of Technical for Special Engineering, Le Quy Don Technical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 2. Vietnam Association on Aviation Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Received:2023-05-29 Accepted:2023-08-28 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-20

摘要: 通过对各向同性固结不排水试样进行循环三轴试验,研究了饱和重塑砂土的液化行为。试验采用恒幅正弦载荷,通过测量剪切模量、阻尼比、轴向应变和超孔隙水压力比的变化,评估了加载频率(分别为0.1、0.5、1.0 Hz)和压实度(分别为0.95、0.90和0.80)对砂土液化行为的影响。试验结果表明,对于压实度为0.95的砂样,在5 000次加载循环中,0.1 Hz的加载频率对液化过程影响甚微;而对于压实度为0.90和0.80的砂样,此频率的影响显著。对于压实度为0.80的砂样,当频率增加到0.5 Hz时几乎一加载就直接发生液化。这表明增加加载频率会加快液化速度,而增加压实度则会减慢液化速度。因此,通过一系列的试验可以模拟现场砂土在不同频率下的动荷载条件。试验结果表明,饱和砂土的液化行为由以下因素决定:(1)试样的压实度越低,液化越容易发生;(2)加载频率越高,液化越容易发生;(3)循环轴向应变越大,发生液化所需的循环次数越少;(4)超孔隙水压力随加载循环次数增加,直至试样完全液化。

关键词: 液化行为, 加载频率, 循环三轴试验, 饱和, 固结, 不排水条件, 重塑砂土, 压实度

Abstract: The article investigates the liquefaction behavior of saturated reconstituted sand by cyclic triaxial tests on isotropic consolidated undrained specimens in the laboratory. Experiments conduct using a sinusoidal load with a constant amplitude to evaluate the influence of the loading frequency (at three different frequencies of 0.1 Hz, 0.5 Hz, and 1.0 Hz) and relative compaction (three different relative compactions of 0.95, 0.90, and 0.80) on the liquefaction behavior of the sand, as measured by the shear modulus, damping ratio, axial strain, and excess pore water pressure ratio. Based on the experimental results, it can be observed that for the sand specimen with a relative compaction of 0.95, the loading frequency of 0.1 Hz has a negligible effect on the liquefaction process, as observed over 5 000 loading cycles. In contrast, the effect of this frequency is significant for the sand specimens with relative compactions of 0.90 and 0.80. For the specimen with a relative compaction of 0.80, an increase in frequency to 0.5 Hz results in almost direct liquefaction. This suggests that increasing loading frequency leads to faster liquefaction while increasing relative compaction results in slower liquefaction by contrast. Thus, through a series of tests, these can be considered simulations of the conditions of dynamic loads on the sand particles in the field with different frequencies. The experimental results show that the liquefaction behavior of saturated sand is determined by the following factors: (1) The lower the relative compaction, the easier liquefaction occurs; (2) The higher the loading frequency, the easier liquefaction occurs; (3) The greater the cyclic axial strain, the fewer cycles are required to cause liquefaction; (4) The excess pore water pressure increases with the increase of number of loading cycles until the specimen is completely liquefied.

Key words: liquefaction behavior, loading frequency, cyclic triaxial tests, saturation, consolidation, undrained conditions, reconstituted sand, relative compaction

中图分类号: TU441
[1] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[4] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[5] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[6] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[7] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[8] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[9] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[10] 富海鹰, 钟雨薇, 王孝文, 吴博涵, 袁冉, . 基于次加载面理论的砂土临界状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1788-1798.
[11] 亢佳伟, 邓国华, 李开超, 王丽琴, . 基于原位浸水试验的黄土软化力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1851-1864.
[12] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[13] 杨校辉, 赵子毅, 郭楠, 钱豹, 朱彦鹏, . 横观各向同性非饱和黄土蠕变特性及沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1489-1500.
[14] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[15] 杨柳, 吉明秀, 赵艳, 耿振坤, 李思源, 马雄德, 张谦, . 致密砂岩孔隙结构对两相驱替特征及CO2封存效率的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1187-1195.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!