岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2117-2128.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1807

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土-岩组合地基变截面锚杆承载性能与机制研究

曾二贤1,程述一2,伍林伟1,陈成3,吏垚1,刘观仕3   

  1. 1.中国电力工程顾问集团中南电力设计院有限公司,湖北 武汉 430071;2.国家电网公司, 北京 100031; 3.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-30 接受日期:2024-03-12 出版日期:2024-07-10 发布日期:2024-07-23
  • 通讯作者: 陈成,男,1986年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土工程研究。E-mail:cchen@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:曾二贤,男,1984年生,硕士,高级工程师,从事电力工程方面的设计与研究工作。E-mail:zengerxian@csepdi.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家电网有限公司科技项目(No. SGZB0000TGJS2300369);中电工程中南电力设计院科技项目(No. QQ02231);国家自然科学基金(No. 41972293)

Bearing behavior and mechanism of variable-section anchors in soil-rock composite foundation

ZENG Er-xian1, CHENG Shu-yi2, WU Lin-wei1, CHEN Cheng3, LI Yao1, LIU Guan-shi3   

  1. 1. Central Southern China Electric Power Design Institute of CPECC, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2 State Grid Corporation of China, Beijing 100031, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2023-11-30 Accepted:2024-03-12 Online:2024-07-10 Published:2024-07-23
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China (SGZB0000TGJS2300369), the Science and Technology Project of Central Southern China Electric Power Design Institute (QQ02231) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972293).

摘要: 以山区输电线路工程为背景,针对实践中广泛遇到的上土下岩二元层状地基,提出了一种变截面锚杆技术,其原理为通过增大上覆土层中锚杆的截面积,达到充分利用上覆土层和下部岩层承载力的目的。为检验变截面锚杆的性能,采用现场真型试验和数值模拟相结合的手段,探讨了其承载力提升机制,分析了不同因素对承载特性的影响规律。研究表明,较等截面锚杆,变截面锚杆的上拔、下压以及水平承载力均有所提升。其中,水平承载性能提升效果最显著。场地覆土层厚度对锚杆上拔承载力影响较大,对下压和水平承载性能影响较小。场地地形坡度对锚杆水平承载性能有较大影响,二者呈负相关。此外,“上拔荷载+水平荷载”模式下,变截面群锚基础的承载性能优于等截面群锚基础和传统复合基础,且具有土方开挖量小以及更适用于斜坡地形的优点。研究成果可为该新型基础的推广应用提供技术支撑。

关键词: 输电线路, 杆塔基础, 岩石锚杆, 土-岩组合地基, 数值分析

Abstract: A type of variable cross-section anchor is proposed for the binary layered foundation with upper soil and lower rock that is widely encountered in transmission line engineering. Its principle is to increase the cross-sectional area of the anchor in the overlying soil layer to fully utilize the bearing capacity of the soil and rock. To examine the performance of the proposed anchor, the load-bearing capacity improvement mechanism of the variable cross-section anchor is discussed through a combination of field tests and numerical simulations, and the effect of different factors on the bearing performance is investigated. The results indicated that compared with uniform section anchor, the uplift, downward, and horizontal bearing capacities of the variable cross-section anchor are increased, and the horizontal bearing performance is improved significantly. The thickness of covering soil on the sites has a significant impact on the uplift bearing capacity of the anchor, while the influence on the downward and horizontal bearing capacity is less. The terrain slope of site has a great influence on the horizontal load-bearing performance of the anchor, and the two are negatively correlated. Furthermore, under the “uplift + horizontal” loading, the group anchor foundation with variable cross-section anchor exhibits higher bearing capacity than the one with uniform section anchor and the traditional composite foundation, and also has the advantages of small excavation volume and more suitable for slope terrain. This study can provide technical support for the application of this new type of foundation.

Key words: transmission line, tower foundation, rock bolt, soil-rock combination foundation, numerical analysis

中图分类号: TU 431
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 鄂天龙, 崔强, 孙志亮, 冯杨州, 李冰臻, 缪栋, 杨健, 苗田, . 新型短柱斜桩复合基础结构优化与承载机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[3] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[4] 胡利文, 洪义, 王德咏, . 水下双面真空预压离心模型试验及数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3059-3070.
[5] Muhammad Usman Azhar, 周 辉, 杨凡杰, 高阳, 朱勇, 路新景, 房后国, 耿轶君, . 软弱泥质砂岩地层中输水隧洞稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 626-639.
[6] 李双龙, 魏丽敏, 冯胜洋, 何群, 张开鑫, . 基于扩展Koppejan模型的被动桩−软土 时效性相互作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2602-2614.
[7] 乔亚飞, 唐洁, 顾贇, 丁文其, . 超深地连墙槽壁侧压力演变模式 及其施工扰动分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1083-1092.
[8] 汪嘉钰, 刘润, 姬永红, 杨旭, 陈广思, 王晓磊, . 筒型基础水平向和抗倾承载力的极限分析上限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 777-788.
[9] 蔡灿, 张沛, 孙明光, 杨迎新, 谢松, 蒲治成, 杨显鹏, 高超, 谭政博, . 油气钻井中的分离式冲击−切削复合破岩机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2535-2544.
[10] 张建聪, 江权, 郝宪杰, 丰光亮, 李邵军, 汪志林, 樊启祥, . 高应力下柱状节理玄武岩应力−结 构型塌方机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2556-2568.
[11] 庄妍, 李劭邦, 崔晓艳, 董晓强, 王康宇, . 高铁荷载下桩承式路基动力响应及土拱效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3119-3130.
[12] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[13] 朱才辉, 崔 晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除 对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[14] 李 宁, 杨 敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[15] 郑黎明, 张洋洋, 李子丰, 马平华, 阳鑫军, . 低频波动下考虑孔隙度与压力不同程度变 化的岩土固结渗流分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1158-1168.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!