岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2251-2262.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0254

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后冲击煤体能量演化与破坏特征

王磊1,杨震宇1,陈礼鹏1,王勇2,张帅1,王安铖1,李伟利1, 2   

  1. 1. 安徽理工大学 深部煤矿采动响应与灾害防控国家重点实验室,安徽 淮南 232001; 2. 煤炭工业合肥设计研究院有限责任公司,安徽 合肥 230041
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-04 接受日期:2024-05-03 出版日期:2024-08-10 发布日期:2024-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨震宇,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事CO2地质封存等方面的研究。E-mail: 17855479034@163.com
  • 作者简介:王磊,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,从事CO2地质封存和煤矿地下安全开采等研究工作。E-mail: leiwang723@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省科技重大专项项目(No. 202203a07020010);省属企业国有资本经营预算项目(No. HM23719030)。

Energy evolution and failure characteristics of impacted coal after varying durations of supercritical CO2 immersion corrosion

WANG Lei1, YANG Zhen-yu1, CHEN Li-peng1, WANG Yong2, ZHANG Shuai1, WANG An-cheng1, LI Wei-li1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 2. Hefei Design and Research Institute of Coal Industry Co., Ltd., Hefei, Anhui 230041, China
  • Received:2024-03-04 Accepted:2024-05-03 Online:2024-08-10 Published:2024-08-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Anhui Province Science and Technology Major Special Projects (202203a07020010) and the Budgetary Items for State-owned Capital Operation of Provincial Enterprises (HM23719030)。

摘要: 在未采煤层封存CO2时,注入的CO2受高温高压影响会处于超临界态,影响煤层稳定性。为研究超临界CO2浸蚀后煤体受扰动影响引起的能量耗散与破坏特征,基于自主研发的高压气体吸附/解吸试验系统对煤体开展不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间(0、2、4、6 d)的吸附试验,利用分离式霍普金森压杆试验系统对超临界CO2作用后的煤体开展冲击压缩试验,并结合高速摄像仪拍摄了冲击过程,分析了冲击煤体的能量耗散规律,阐明了煤体的破坏裂纹演化与破碎分形特征。研究结果表明:相同冲击荷载下,不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后煤样的应力-应变曲线变化趋势类似,可划分为弹性能量耗散、塑性能量耗散和峰后能量耗散3个阶段。随超临界CO2浸蚀时间增长,煤样吸能能力减弱,冲击煤样表面裂纹数量增多,裂纹网络及扩展方向逐渐复杂,煤样破碎更加剧烈,破碎粒径减小,破碎形态更加复杂,最后确定了不同浸蚀时间后煤样破碎分形维数与耗能密度的线性相关关系。研究结果对于开展注CO2强化深部煤层气开采工程探索具有一定的理论意义。

关键词: CO2地质封存, 超临界CO2, 冲击荷载, 能量耗散, 破碎分形

Abstract:

When the CO2 is sealed in the unmined coal seam, the injected CO2 will be in a supercritical state due to the influence of high temperature and high pressure, which will reduce the stability of the coal seam. In order to study the energy dissipation and failure characteristics of coal body caused by disturbance after supercritical CO2 immersion corrosion, based on the self-developed high-pressure gas adsorption/desorption experimental system, we conducted adsorption experiments on the coal with different supercritical CO2 immersion corrosion time (0, 2, 4, and 6 days), and impact compression tests were carried out on the coal after the action of supercritical CO2 by using split Hopkinson pressure bar experimental system, and combined with high-speed videotape camera to film the impact process, to analyze the energy dissipation rules of the impact coal, and to elucidate the destructive cracking evolution and crushing fractal characteristics of the coal. The results show that: the stress-strain curves of coal samples after different supercritical CO2 immersion corrosion time have similar trends under the same impact load, which can be divided into three stages: elastic energy dissipation, plastic energy dissipation, and post-peak energy dissipation. With the increased of supercritical CO2 immersion corrosion time, the energy absorption capacity of coal samples decreased, the number of cracks on the surface of impact coal samples increased, the crack network and propagation direction became more complex, the crushing of coal samples became more intense, the crushing particle size decreased, and the crushing morphology became more complex. Finally, the linear correlation between fractal dimension and energy consumption density of coal samples after different corrosion time was determined. The results of the study have certain theoretical significance for carrying out the exploration of CO2 injection to strengthen the deep coalbed methane extraction project.

Key words: CO2 geological storage, supercritical CO2, impact loading, energy dissipation, crushing fractal

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[2] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[3] 姜立春, 李金柱, 李萍丰, 陈俊豪, . 顶板垮塌激励下多中段空区底板响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 916-929.
[4] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[5] 卢正, 李梦威, 唐楚轩, 胡智, 赵阳, 则志辉, 姚海林, . 考虑不同级配影响的填石路基压实质量评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3346-3354.
[6] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[7] 李顺群, 蔡田明, 张勋程, 张丙坤, 杨长松, 周光毅, 周燕, . 冲击荷载作用下非饱和场地的三维应力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 477-484.
[8] 王智德, 钱梦凡, 李杰, 司莹莹, 江俐敏, . 高应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1917-1928.
[9] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[10] 张宪尚, 文光才, 朱哲明, 隆清明, 刘杰, . 冲击荷载下充填节理岩体I型裂纹动态扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 396-406.
[11] 陈博文, 李琦, 谭永胜, 余涛, 高文彬, 李霞颖, 申筛成, . 不同有效应力下泥岩盖层二氧化碳突破压力演化特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3681-3693.
[12] 贾鹏, 郤保平, 李晓科, 解瑾, 蔡佳豪, 高鹏利, . 花岗岩非稳态传热破坏过程能量演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3013-3023.
[13] 姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 186-196.
[14] 刘勇健, 傅杨攀, 赖明洋, 李彰明, 方昊圆, 谢治堃, . 冲击荷载下土体动力响应与加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2485-2494.
[15] 王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!