岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 3626-3636.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0553CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0553

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究

张凌博1, 2,孙宜松2,程星磊1, 2,郭群录3,赵川4,刘京红1, 2   

  1. 1. 天津城建大学 天津市软土特性与工程环境重点实验室,天津 300384;2. 天津城建大学 土木工程学院,天津 300384; 3. 河北建工集团有限责任公司,河北 石家庄 050051;4. 中国二十二冶集团有限公司,河北 唐山 063000
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-28 接受日期:2025-09-16 出版日期:2025-11-14 发布日期:2025-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 程星磊,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事软土动力特性及本构理论等方面的研究工作。E-mail: chengxinglei110@163.com
  • 作者简介:张凌博,男,1989年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土切削理论与数值模拟等方面的研究工作。E-mail: lbzhang@tcu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 12102295,No. 52378361);天津市自然科学基金(No. 23JCQNJC00850);天津市企业科技特派员项目(No. 23YDTPJC00800)。

Characterization method for the three-dimensional soil cutting failure surface based on damage energy dissipation

ZHANG Ling-bo1, 2, SUN Yi-song2, CHENG Xing-lei1, 2, GUO Qun-lu3, ZHAO Chuan4, LIU Jing-hong1, 2   

  1. 1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Soft Soil Characteristics and Engineering Environment, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China; 3. Hebei Construction Group Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, China; 4. China MCC22 Group Co., Ltd., Tangshan, Hebei 063000, China
  • Received:2025-05-28 Accepted:2025-09-16 Online:2025-11-14 Published:2025-11-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12102295, 52378361), the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin Municipality (23JCQNJC00850) and the Tianjin Municipal Enterprise Technology Commissioner Project (23YDTPJC00800).

摘要: 土体切削问题在隧道掘进、港航疏浚、地质钻探和土木建筑等工程领域中广泛存在。准确表征土体切削过程中刀具前方的三维土体破坏面对于分析土体扰动状态、评估刀具切削性能以及理解土体-刀具相互作用机制具有重要意义。采用非线性弹塑性损伤本构模型描述土体变形破坏过程,基于土体介质单位面积损伤能量耗散特征,提出了一种新的能够直接表征三维土体切削破坏面的数值方法。通过对不同工况条件下平面刀具土体切削过程进行数值模拟,验证了提出的土体切削破坏面表征方法的有效性和稳健性,并结合理论计算讨论了切削角度和深度对破坏面宽度、破坏距离、土体扰动面积和剪切破坏角的影响。此外,基于该数值方法获取的复杂刀具土体切削破坏面形状与试验结果相符,进而验证了提出的土体破坏面表征方法对复杂刀具的适用性。

关键词: 土体切削, 损伤能量耗散, 破坏面, 复杂刀具, 数值模拟

Abstract: The problem of soil cutting widely exists in engineering fields such as tunnelling, port and waterway dredging, geological drilling, and civil construction. Accurately characterizing the three-dimensional soil failure surface in front of the cutting tool during the soil cutting process is of great significance for analyzing soil disturbance states, evaluating tool cutting performance, and understanding soil-tool interaction mechanisms. A nonlinear elastoplastic damage-based constitutive model is employed to describe the deformation and failure process of soil. Based on the characteristics of damage energy dissipation per unit area of the soil medium, a new numerical method is proposed to directly characterize the three-dimensional soil failure surface. Numerical simulations of flat-tool cutting processes under various operating conditions verify the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed characterization method. The influence of cutting angle and depth on the width, rupture distance, soil disturbance area, and shear failure angle of the three-dimensional soil failure surface is discussed in combination with theoretical calculations. Furthermore, the shape of the three-dimensional soil failure surface for complex-shaped tools obtained through this numerical method is consistent with experimental results, further validating the applicability of the proposed method for complex tool scenarios.

Key words: soil cutting, damage energy dissipation, failure profile, complex tool, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU 413
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[6] 张寻龙, 曹成勇, 陈湘生, . 土−岩复合地层超深圆形竖井开挖变形特性案例研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3924-3933.
[7] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[8] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[9] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[10] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[11] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[12] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[13] 赵崇熙, 徐超, 王清明, 张胜, 李昊煜, . 土工合成材料加筋土桥台极限承载力的离心载荷试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1643-1650.
[14] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
[15] 马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!