岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 3649-3660.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0570CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0570

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟

吴迪1,陈嵘1,孔纲强2,牛庚1,缪玉松1,王振兴3   

  1. 1. 青岛理工大学 理学院,山东 青岛 266525;2. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210024; 3. 中建八局发展建设公司,山东 青岛 266061
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-02 接受日期:2025-09-16 出版日期:2025-11-14 发布日期:2025-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 缪玉松,男,1986年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地下工程方面的研究。E-mail: gzcrazystone@163.com
  • 作者简介:吴迪,男,1990年生,博士,副教授,主要从事能源岩土与地下结构工程方面的研究。E-mail: wudi@qut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 52478347, No. 52008225);山东省自然科学基金项目(No. ZR2024ME108);山东省“青创团队计划”(No. 2023KJ115)。

Field test and numerical simulation on thermo-mechanical response characteristics of a bridge energy row pile under heating-cooling cycles

WU Di1, CHEN Rong1, KONG Gang-qiang2, NIU Geng1, MIAO Yu-song1, WANG Zhen-xing3   

  1. 1. School of Science, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266525 China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 3. The Development Construction Co. Ltd. of China Construction Eighth Engineering Division, Qingdao, Shandong 266061, China
  • Received:2025-06-02 Accepted:2025-09-16 Online:2025-11-14 Published:2025-11-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52478347, 52008225), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2024ME108) and the Youth Innovation Team Foundation of Shandong Province (2023KJ115).

摘要: 将桥梁排桩与能量桩相结合构成桥梁能量排桩,可利用浅层地热能在冬夏季分别进行桥面除冰和桥面降温,同时还能支撑桥梁荷载。通过开展现场试验,研究了冷-热循环下桥梁能量排桩的热-力响应特性,揭示了桥梁能量排桩-承台-非加热桩的相互作用机制。将考虑桩-土界面循环剪切特性的界面模型在有限元软件中进行二次开发,建立了桥梁能量排桩热-力耦合数值模型,进一步探究了桩顶荷载和冷-热循环联合作用下桥梁能量排桩长期沉降特性及产生机制。研究表明,桥梁能量排桩-承台-非加热桩的相互作用会造成荷载重分布,导致桥梁能量排桩顶部受到较强约束作用而产生较大热应力,可达桩体最大热应力的80%(约为1.1 MPa);承台的附加应力最大可达3.75 MPa,超过了C30混凝土抗拉强度。当桩顶荷载较大时,随着冷-热循环次数的增加,桥梁能量排桩逐渐产生长期沉降并呈负指数增长,这一现象可归因于施加桩顶荷载会导致桩-土界面的力学性能接近极限状态,极限状态下桩-土界面循环剪切容易产生塑性剪切位移,最终导致桥梁能量排桩长期沉降的产生。

关键词: 桥梁能量排桩, 热-力响应特性, 冷-热循环, 现场试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: Combining bridge row piles with energy piles to create energy row piles can harness shallow geothermal energy for bridge deck deicing in winter and cooling in summer, respectively, while also supporting the mechanical loads of the bridge deck. This study investigates the thermo-mechanical response of energy row piles under heating-cooling cycles through field tests, and analyzes the interactions among energy row piles, slab, and unheated piles. An interface model considering the cyclic shear characteristics of the pile-soil interface is developed in a finite element software, and thermo-mechanical coupling numerical models of energy row piles are established to further explore the changes and mechanisms of long-term settlement of energy row pile under the combined effect of mechanical loads and heating-cooling cycles. The findings reveal that interactions among the energy row pile, slab, and unheated piles can result in load redistribution, leading to high thermally induced stresses of approximately 80% of the maximum thermally induced stress of the energy row pile (i.e. 1.1 MPa) at the top of the energy row piles due to strong restraining effects. Meanwhile, the slab experiences tensile stress exceeding the tensile strength of C30 concrete, reaching 3.75 MPa. Moreover, when the mechanical load is large, energy row piles progressively develop long-term settlement with an increasing number of thermal cycles, exhibiting a negative exponential growth pattern. This phenomenon is attributed to the mechanical load driving the pile-soil interface toward its limiting state, where cyclic shear at the interface readily induces plastic shear displacements, ultimately resulting in the long-term settlement of the energy row piles.

Key words: bridge energy row piles, thermo-mechanical characteristic, heating-cooling cycle, field test, numerical simulation.

中图分类号: TU 443
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[4] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[5] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[6] 聂庆科, 张海清, 杨海朋, 贾向新, 张日华. 赤泥−粉煤灰地聚物桩的开发与现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3683-3693.
[7] 张寻龙, 曹成勇, 陈湘生, . 土−岩复合地层超深圆形竖井开挖变形特性案例研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3924-3933.
[8] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[9] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[10] 许国庆, 黄高翔, 王协康, 罗登泽, 李洪涛, 姚强, . 新型弧形聚能爆破作用下的岩石破裂演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3267-3279.
[11] 王帅, 王豫徽, 王玲, 李佳祺, 赵梓皓, 庞凯旋, . 基于晶体模型的岩石孔隙结构与矿物组成对裂纹扩展影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[12] 杨立. 平板载荷试验数值分析及承载力判定标准研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[13] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[14] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
[15] 马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!