碳酸酐酶,微生物诱导碳酸盐沉淀(MICP),矿化,脲酶,水合反应,力学性能," /> 碳酸酐酶,微生物诱导碳酸盐沉淀(MICP),矿化,脲酶,水合反应,力学性能,"/> 碳酸酐酶增强微生物矿化固土效果的试验研究

岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 2554-2564.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1594

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

碳酸酐酶增强微生物矿化固土效果的试验研究

刘鹏1,曹源兴1,程钰2,白云波3   

  1. 1. 南京林业大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 210037;2. 山东科技大学 交通学院,山东 青岛 266590; 3. 中铁上海工程局集团有限公司,上海 201906
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-24 接受日期:2024-02-07 出版日期:2024-09-06 发布日期:2024-08-30
  • 作者简介:刘鹏,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: liupengreal@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51809139)。

Experimental study of enhancing the effects of microbial-induced calcite precipitation treated sand using carbonic anhydrase

LIU Peng1, CAO Yuan-xing1, CHENG Yu2, BAI Yun-bo3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China; 2. School of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 3. Shanghai Civil Engineering Group Co. Ltd. of CREC, Shanghai 201906, China
  • Received:2023-10-24 Accepted:2024-02-07 Online:2024-09-06 Published:2024-08-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51809139).

摘要:

为了提升微生物固化砂土的效果,从自然界微生物主动参与碳循环、激发碳化现象中得到启发,利用碳酸酐酶(carbonic anhydrase,简称CA)能显著提高CO2水合反应速率(提高108倍),促进脲酶(urease,简称UA)分解尿素生成的CO2迅速水合形成大量的特性,设计并进行了碳酸酐酶增强微生物矿化固化砂土试验,综合宏观物理力学试验和微细观检测,系统分析了碳酸酐酶对微生物固化砂土的增强效果及增强机制。结果表明:(1)碳酸酐酶能够显著提高砂土微生物加固过程中的胶结物产量,碳酸酐酶菌掺量在4%左右达到最佳,与常规微生物诱导碳酸盐沉淀(microbial-induced carbonate precipitation,简称MICP)相比,胶结物生成量提高了105.3%。(2)碳酸酐酶的掺入提高了固化体的抗压强度和抵抗变形能力,在0.25%~4.00%掺量范围内,固化土样的无侧限抗压强度随碳酸酐酶菌掺量的增加而增大。当掺量为4.00%时固化土样的强度达到1.915 MPa,为常规MICP固化试样强度的8.54倍。(3)碳酸酐酶没有改变MICP过程的产物,仍是方解石。但在添加了CA后,方解石的晶粒尺寸更大,六面体形状更规范,力学性能也更好。(4)在MICP过程中,脲酶和碳酸酐酶相互协同沉淀碳酸钙固化砂土。碳酸酐酶可以显著加速脲酶分解尿素生成的CO2水合并形成HCO3-CO32-的速率,为矿化物沉降提供更有利的条件。

关键词: 碳酸酐酶')">

碳酸酐酶, 微生物诱导碳酸盐沉淀(MICP), 矿化, 脲酶, 水合反应, 力学性能

Abstract:

This study aimed to enhance the efficiency of microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) for reinforcing sandy soil by inspiring natural processes involving microbial-induced carbon cycling and carbonation. The experiment focused on enhancing MICP curing of sandy soil using carbonic anhydrase (CA), which significantly increases the reaction rate of CO2 hydration (108 times faster) and facilitates the rapid hydration of CO2 (produced by urease (UA) decomposition of urea) to form a substantial amount of carbonate. The effect of carbonic anhydrase on MICP-reinforced sandy soil and its underlying mechanism were systematically examined through a combination of macroscopic physical and mechanical tests and microfabrication tests. The results showed that: (1) CA significantly increases the production of cement during the microbial consolidation of sandy soils, and the optimum dose of carbonic anhydrase producing bacteria is reached at about 4%, which increases the production of cement by 105.3%, compared with conventional MICP. (2) The incorporation of CA improves the compressive strength and resistance of the cured body. In the range 0.25−4.00%, the unconfined compressive strength of the solidified soil sample increases with the increase of the CA bacteria content. The strength of the cured soil sample reaches 1.915 MPa when the content is 4%, which is 8.54 times the strength of the conventional MICP cured sample. (3) CA does not change the product of the MICP process, it is still calcite, but after adding CA, the grain size of the calcite is larger, the shape of the hexahedron is more standardised, and the mechanical properties are improved. (4) In the process of MICP, urease and CA co-precipitate calcium carbonate-cured sandy soil. CA can significantly accelerate the rate of urea-generated CO2 hydrate and form HCO3-and CO32-, providing more favourable conditions for mineralisation.

Key words: carbonic anhydrase, microbial induced carbonate precipitation (MICP), mineralisation, urease, hydration, mechanical properties

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[2] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[3] 杨阳, 张程, 何想, 张建伟, 陈育民, 叶琳, 武发思, 张涵, . 活性生物泥诱导碳酸钙修复仿真文物砖可行性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1777-1787.
[4] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[5] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[6] 唐译, 蔡世兴, 蔡正银. 微生物加固含细粒土砂动孔压模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3187-3196.
[7] 陶高梁, 周恒洁, 肖衡林, 周宏豫, . 新型边坡防护生态基材的力学-植生性能与抗冲刷效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3018-3032.
[8] 谢毅鑫, 郑文杰, 薛中飞, 王琳, . 微生物诱导碳酸盐沉淀修复铜污染黄土的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 443-450.
[9] 薛中飞, 郑文杰, 王琳, 谢毅鑫, 秦鹏, . 基于微胶囊技术的自愈碳酸盐沉淀材料修复强酸环境下的含铅废水研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 115-122.
[10] 赖汉江, 刘润明, 陈志波, 崔明娟, . 粒径效应对大豆粗脲酶固化砂土效果的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 25-32.
[11] 赖永明, 俞缙, 刘士雨, 蔡燕燕, 涂兵雄, 刘谦, . pH值下微生物诱导碳酸盐沉淀加固尾矿砂试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1583-1596.
[12] 徐文彬, 赵康奇, 张亚伦, 刘成保, 周磊, . 调控层胶结充填体三轴压缩力学性能及破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3658-3667.
[13] 缪林昌, 王恒星, 孙潇昊, 吴林玉, 郭薪, 范广才. 生物矿化固沙长效性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3212-3220.
[14] 田威, 王肖辉, 云伟, 程续. 基于不同后处理方法的砂型3D打印类岩石试样力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1330-1340.
[15] 骆赵刚, 丁选明, 欧强, 蒋春勇, 方华强, . 土工格栅加筋珊瑚砂的强度及变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1053-1064.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!