岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 2539-2553.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1611

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

复杂应力路径下的花岗岩洞室开挖损伤区研究

王贵宾1,刘桓兑1, 2,唐明豪3,杨春和1,陈世万4   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 浙江省应急管理科学研究院,浙江 杭州 310012;4. 贵州大学 资源与环境工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550033
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-27 接受日期:2024-01-05 出版日期:2024-09-06 发布日期:2024-08-30
  • 通讯作者: 刘桓兑,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事硬岩损伤演化机理的研究工作。E-mail: hd_liu0616@163.com
  • 作者简介:王贵宾,男,1975年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事坚硬岩体节理裂隙表征及其力学特性的研究工作。E-mail: gbwang@whrsm.ac.cn.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42272321,No.42162027)

Excavation damage zones in granite cavern under complex stress paths

WANG Gui-bin1, LIU Huan-dui1, 2, TANG Ming-hao3, YANG Chun-he1, CHEN Shi-wan4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Zhejiang Academy of Emergency Management Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China; 4. College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550003, China
  • Received:2023-10-27 Accepted:2024-01-05 Online:2024-09-06 Published:2024-08-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272321, 42162027).

摘要: 在储库的建设与运行过程中,复杂的应力路径是控制围岩损伤的主要因素。然而在围岩的损伤区研究中,应力路径仍未得到充分考虑,特别是忽略了主应力轴旋转在围岩损伤中的作用。基于岩石扭剪仪开展岩石主应力轴旋转试验,利用断裂力学理论对裂隙的尖端应力场进行了分析。结果表明,应力旋转会提高裂隙尖端的拉应力以促进裂隙的进一步发育,从而导致岩体强度的降低,且降低幅度与旋转角度呈明显的正相关关系。基于上述结果提出了一种考虑应力旋转的损伤演化表征法,在岩体最大偏应力超过第一次起裂应力后,对主应力轴任意方向的旋转角度进行累加,得到累计有效旋转角度。利用其随深度变化规律实现开挖损伤区(excavation damage zones,简称EDZS)的圈定,同时利用损伤区的最大深度和超过第2次起裂应力的偏应力范围划定剥落区。该方法综合考虑了应力路径中主应力的幅值与旋转角度的变化,更加全面地反映了围岩损伤演化机制,并通过Mine-by隧道数值模型与现场监测数据的对比进行了有效性验证。本研究可以为理解围岩损伤机制和预测围岩损伤范围提供新思路。

关键词: 应力路径, 开挖损伤区(EDZ), 花岗岩, 起裂应力, 应力旋转

Abstract:

 During the construction and operation of storage reservoirs, the complex stress path plays a crucial role in controlling the damage to the surrounding rock. However, the current study of surrounding rocks lacks a comprehensive consideration of stress paths, especially in terms of the principal stress axis rotation. In this research, a test on rock principal stress axis rotation was conducted using the rock torsion shear apparatus, and the stress field at the fracture tip under stress rotation was analyzed employing fracture mechanics theory. The findings suggest that stress rotation increases the tensile stress at the fracture tip, accelerates fracture propagation, and leads to a notable decrease in rock strength. A methodology for characterizing damage evolution considering stress rotation is proposed based on these findings. Once the maximum differential stress exceeds the first cracking stress, the rotation angles in each direction of the principal stress axis are summed to obtain the cumulative effective rotation angle. This angle is then used to delineate the excavation damage zones (EDZs) based on its variation with depth. The spalling zone is identified using the maximum depth of the damage zone and the range of differential stress that exceeds the second cracking stress. The method integrates the amplitude and rotation angle of the principal stresses to offer a more comprehensive response to the surrounding rock damage evolution mechanism. The validity of this approach is confirmed through a comparison between the numerical model of the Mine-by tunnel and the monitoring data. This study provides novel insights into the damage mechanism of surrounding rock and the prediction of the surrounding rock damage range.

Key words: stress path, excavation damage zone(EDZ), granite, crack initiation stress, stress rotation

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[2] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[3] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[4] 薛熠, 杨博鹍, 刘勇, 孙强, 张云, 曹正正, . 液氮循环冷冲击作用下高温花岗岩I型断裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 422-436.
[5] FARHAD Jamil, 曾长女, 马媛, SHARAFAT Ali. 初始固结角度对饱和粉质土应变发展的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
[6] 秦悠, 龙慧, 吴琪, 庄海洋, 陈国兴. 复杂应力路径下饱和珊瑚砂孔压增长与刚度退化的阈值应变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3441-3450.
[7] 慕焕东, 邓亚虹, 赵勋昌, 何乃楠, 郑龙浩, 何也, . 基于非饱和剪切体变特征的马兰黄土液化评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3197-3207.
[8] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[9] 周长冰, 闫俊豪, 李小双, . 花岗岩热破裂裂隙动态演化特性数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 694-704.
[10] 陈军浩, 张艳娥, 王刚, 王恒, . 不同固结路径下钙质砂固结排水强度性状研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2290-2298.
[11] 李永强, 许言, 陈波, 熊健辉, 卢玢宇, . 反压诱导有效应力增生模式与土体强度关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2338-2350.
[12] 王智德, 钱梦凡, 李杰, 司莹莹, 江俐敏, . 高应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1917-1928.
[13] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 程胜锦, 田世轩, 陈岩, . 不同控制方式和卸荷应力路径下类岩石节理剪切强度特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2061-2071.
[14] 袁伟, 李建春, 李星, . 花岗岩冲击剪切力学行为的试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1675-1685.
[15] 薛秀丽, 刘治珩, 曾超峰, 白 宁, 陈宏波. 开挖前抽水条件下基坑围挡两侧非极限土压力计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1699-1708.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!