岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 2633-2652.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1677

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

裂隙煤岩组合体单轴压缩力学响应及失稳机制

陈光波1, 2,唐薇1,李谭1, 2,王创业1, 3, 4, 5,王二雨1, 3, 4, 5,张国华6   

  1. 1. 内蒙古科技大学 矿业与煤炭学院,内蒙古 包头 014010;2. 山东科技大学 能源与矿业工程学院,山东 青岛 266590;3. 内蒙古科技大学 内蒙古自治区矿业工程重点实验室,内蒙古 包头 014010;4. 内蒙古科技大学 内蒙古自治区煤炭安全开采与利用工程技术研究中心,内蒙古 包头 014010;5. 内蒙古科技大学 内蒙古煤炭绿色开采与绿色利用协同创新中心,内蒙古 包头 0140106;6. 黑龙江科技大学,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150022)
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-07 接受日期:2024-03-30 出版日期:2024-09-06 发布日期:2024-09-02
  • 作者简介:陈光波,男,1990年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事矿山岩石力学与工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: cgb150617@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.52304142,No.52064042);内蒙古自治区直属高校基本科研业务费项目(No.2023QNJS108);内蒙古自治区高等学校青年科技英才支持计划项目(No.NJYT22073);内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(No.2022MS05037)。

Mechanical response and instability model of fractured coal-rock combined body

CHEN Guang-bo1, 2, TANG Wei1, LI Tan1, 2, WANG Chuang-ye1, 3, 4, 5, WANG Er-yu1, 3, 4, 5, ZHANG Guo-hua6   

  1. 1. School of Mining and Coal, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, Inner Mongolia 014010, China; 2. College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 3. Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Mining Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, Inner Mongolia 014010, China; 4. Inner Mongolia Research Center for Coal Safety Mining and Utilization Engineering and Technology, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, Inner Mongolia 014010, China; 5. Inner Mongolia Cooperative Innovation Center for Coal Green Mining and Green Utilization, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, Inner Mongolia 014010, China; 6. Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150022, China
  • Received:2023-11-07 Accepted:2024-03-30 Online:2024-09-06 Published:2024-09-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52304142, 52064042), the Basic Scientific Research Fees of Colleges and Universities Directly under Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2023QNJS108), the Program for Young Talents of Science and Technology in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (NJYT22073) and the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia of China (2022MS05037).

摘要: 煤岩系统中煤层与岩层之间的层间薄弱带是裂隙分布的主要区域,这些裂隙贯穿于两岩层,严重影响着煤岩系统的力学性质与工程稳定。为探究贯穿裂隙对煤岩系统力学性质的影响,对5种裂隙长度、5种裂隙角度的裂隙煤岩组合体开展轴向加载试验,结果表明:(1)随裂隙长度的增加,抗压强度、弹性模量、峰值能量、冲击能量指数呈线性减小。随裂隙角度的增大,抗压强度、弹性模量、峰值能量、冲击能量指数先减小后增大。(2)试样破坏声发射活动均经历平静期、活跃期、剧烈期3个阶段。随裂隙长度的增加,声发射累计能量先增加后减小。随裂隙角度的增大,声发射峰值能量和累计能量先增大后减小。(3)裂隙长度和角度对翼裂纹、次生倾斜裂纹、次生共面裂纹、斜裂纹、次生衍生裂纹、翼裂纹衍生裂纹、远场裂纹以及剥落现象有一定影响。(4)随裂隙长度的增加,黏聚力和内摩擦角逐渐降低。随裂隙角度的增加,黏聚力和内摩擦角先减小后增大。(5)构建了考虑裂隙长度和裂隙角度的Drucker-Prager强度准则,合理性验证发现:试样误差在1.367%~5.055%合理范围之内。(6)基于耗散结构理论,分析了组合体失稳破坏机制,组合体破坏主要经历了准稳态、亚稳态、失稳、新稳态4个阶段;构建了裂隙煤岩组合体能量运移模型,分析了裂隙煤岩组合体失稳破坏过程中的能量运移规律。裂隙两端是能量积聚的主要区域,煤组分裂隙端破坏时,一部分能量运移到岩石组分裂隙端,以岩石组分破坏或变形的形式释放出去。研究结果可为探究深部煤岩力学性质、揭示煤岩动力灾害发生机制提供有益参考。

关键词: 预制裂隙, 煤岩组合体, 力学响应, 能量运移, 试验研究

Abstract: In the coal-rock system, the interlayer weak zone between coal and rock layers is the primary area of fracture distribution. These fractures penetrate the coal and rock layers, seriously impacting the mechanical properties and engineering stability of the coal-rock system. To investigate the impact of penetrating fractures on the mechanical properties of the coal-rock system, axial loading tests were conducted on prefabricated coal-rock composite bodies with five different fracture lengths and angles. The findings indicate that: 1) As the fracture length increases, the compressive strength, elastic modulus, peak energy, and impact energy index decrease linearly. Regarding the fracture angle, the compressive strength, elastic modulus, peak energy, and impact energy index initially decrease and then increase. 2) The destructive acoustic emission tests of the samples exhibit three stages: a quiet period, an active period, and an intense period, respectively. With increasing fracture length, the cumulative energy of acoustic emission initially increases and then decreases. Similarly, with increasing fracture angle, both peak energy and cumulative energy of acoustic emission first increase and then decrease. 3) The length and angle of fracture have a certain influence on the wing crack, secondary inclined crack, secondary coplanar crack, oblique crack, secondary derivative crack, wing crack derivative crack, far field crack and spalling phenomenon. 4) As fracture length increases, the cohesion and internal friction gradually decrease, while an increase in fracture angle leads to a decrease followed by an increase in cohesion and internal friction. 5) The Drucker-Prager strength criterion considering fracture length and angle was developed, and rationality verification indicated a sample error within a reasonable range of 1.367% to 5.055%. 6) Based on the dissipative structure theory, the study analyzed the mechanism of instability failure in the coal-rock combined body. The failure process of the combined body involved four main stages: quasi-steady state, metastable state, instability, and establishment of a new steady state. An energy migration model for the fractured coal-rock combined body was developed, and the energy migration pattern during the instability and failure of the fractured coal-rock combined body was analyzed. The ends of the fracture were identified as the primary areas of energy accumulation. Destruction of the coal component’s fracture end led to the migration of energy towards the fracture end of the rock component, resulting in the release of energy through rock component destruction or deformation. These research findings offer valuable insights for investigating the mechanical characteristics of deep coal and rock, as well as understanding the mechanisms behind dynamic coal and rock disasters.

Key words: prefabricated fissures, coal-rock combined body, mechanical response, energy migration, experimental study

中图分类号: TD324
[1] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[2] 乔龙全, 常聚才, 严良欢, 齐潮, 史文豹, . 类软岩真三轴劈裂注浆裂隙扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 833-850.
[3] 兰斌鹏, 王延平, 王卫国, 王义军, 赵跃, . 拉桩支护结构变形及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 551-562.
[4] 李永威, 徐林荣, 傅金阳, 商拥辉, . 列车荷载作用下铁路路基填料渗透破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[5] 宋硕, 任富强, 常来山, . 含预应力锚杆煤岩组合体破坏及声发射特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 449-460.
[6] 王凯, 付强, 徐超, 艾子博, 李丹, 王磊, 舒龙勇, . 原生煤岩组合体界面力学效应数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 623-633.
[7] 茹文凯, 胡善超, 李地元, 马金银, 张晨曦, 罗平框, 弓昊, 周奥辉, . 煤岩组合体卸围压能量演化规律及耗散能损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3448-3458.
[8] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 峰前循环剪切作用下岩石节理剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 52-62.
[9] 陈光波, 张俊文, 贺永亮, 张国华, 李谭, . 煤岩组合体峰前能量分布公式推导及试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 130-143.
[10] 范杰, 朱星, 胡桔维, 唐垚, 贺春蕾, . 基于3D-DIC的砂岩裂纹扩展及损伤监测试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1009-1019.
[11] 汪铁楠, 翟越, 高欢, 李宇白, 李艳, 孙维振, 颜廷韵, . 静力压缩下煤岩组合体的裂前宏观弹性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1031-1040.
[12] 雷勇, 李鹏甲, 刘泽宇, 李金朝, 胡伟. 岩溶区穿越溶洞基桩屈曲临界荷载计算方法 与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3347-3356.
[13] 崔猛, 符晓, 郑俊杰, 吕苏颖, 熊辉辉, 曾晨, 韩尚宇, . 黄豆脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀多变量试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3027-3035.
[14] 夏洋洋, 方宏远, 张超, 潘艳辉, 翟文博, 石明生, . 顶管施工对新型复合装配式支护工作井的 力学响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2799-2808.
[15] 杨 科, 刘文杰, 马衍坤, 许日杰, 池小楼, . 真三轴单面临空下煤岩组合体冲击 破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 15-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!