岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 551-562.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1079

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

拉桩支护结构变形及工作机制试验研究

兰斌鹏1,王延平1,王卫国1,王义军2,赵跃2   

  1. 1. 山东理工大学 建筑工程与空间信息学院,山东 淄博 255049;2 成都市勘察测绘研究院,四川 成都 610084
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-02 接受日期:2024-10-29 出版日期:2025-02-10 发布日期:2025-02-11
  • 通讯作者: 王延平,男,1975年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土体稳定性及灾害防治方面的研究与教学工作。 E-mail: wyp@sdut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:兰斌鹏,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土体稳定性及基坑安全工程方面的研究工作。 E-mail: lanbp2000@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金(No. ZR2021MD011)。

Experiment on deformation and working mechanism of the pull-pile supporting structure

LAN Bin-peng1, WANG Yan-ping1, WANG Wei-guo1, WANG Yi-jun2, ZHAO Yue2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, Shandong 255049, China; 2. Chengdu Institute of Survey and Investigation, Chengdu, Sichuan 610084, China
  • Received:2024-09-02 Accepted:2024-10-29 Online:2025-02-10 Published:2025-02-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021MD011).

摘要: 深基坑拉桩支护结构是由前排桩、后拉桩、冠梁以及连系梁构成的三维空间结构体系。既有工程案例已经表明拉桩支护结构具有较好的抗倾覆、控制水平侧向变形的服役性能,但相应的理论支撑及成体系性研究较少。为深入探究拉桩支护结构体系变形性状、内力演化特征以及工作机制,进行了拉桩支护结构室内缩尺试验。结果表明:前排桩桩身水平侧向位移分布曲线呈上凸状,桩身弯矩分布曲线呈反S状,桩身轴力分布曲线呈梭子状,桩身轴力为压力;后拉桩弯矩分布曲线呈弓状,桩身轴力分布曲线呈勺子状,上部为轴向拉力,下部为轴向压力;冠梁水平侧向位移分布曲线呈短冠梁的正弦函数状,轴力分布曲线呈明显M状,M状曲线的双峰处对应的区域为不带后拉桩的前排桩桩顶冠梁,亦是冠梁薄弱点。拉桩支护结构的空间特点可形成较为稳定的拉压结合的大三角内嵌两个小三角式、三向门式框架结构,随之产生的后拉桩效应与空间变形协调效应分别具有锚拉前排桩、遮蔽土压力的能力和控制支护桩桩顶倾角差异过大与冠梁水平侧向变形差异过大的能力。

关键词: 拉桩支护结构, 变形特征, 工作机制, 试验研究

Abstract: The pull-pile support structure in a deep foundation pit is a three-dimensional spatial structure system composed of front-row piles, back-pull piles, a crown beam, and tie beams. Existing engineering cases demonstrate that the pull-pile support structure effectively resists overturning and controls horizontal deformation, yet lacks comprehensive theoretical support and systematic research. To thoroughly investigate the deformation behavior, internal force evolution, and working mechanism of the pull-pile support system during foundation pit excavation, an indoor scale test was conducted. Results indicate that the horizontal displacement curve of the front-row pile is convex, the bending moment curve is anti-S shaped, the axial force curve is shuttle-shaped, and the axial force on the pile body is compressive force. The bending moment curve of the back-pull pile is bow-shaped, and the axial force curve is spoon-shaped. The upper section of the back-pull pile experiences axial tension, while the lower section experiences axial compression. The horizontal lateral displacement curve of the crown beam presents sine function shape of the short crown beam, and the axial force curve presents an obvious M shape. The double peaks of the M shape correspond to the crown beam atop the front-row pile without back-pull support, marking a weak point for potential failure of the crown beam. The spatial characteristics of the pull-pile support structure allow for a stable tension-compression combined structure, forming a large triangle with two smaller triangles and a three-way door frame. The resulting back-pull pile effect and spatial deformation coordination can anchor the front-row pile and shield against earth pressure, as well as suppress differences in the top inclination angle of the supporting pile and excessive deformation of crown beam.

Key words: pull-pile support structures, deformation characteristics, working mechanism, experimental study

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 李永威, 徐林荣, 傅金阳, 商拥辉, . 列车荷载作用下铁路路基填料渗透破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[2] 陈光波, 唐薇, 李谭, 王创业, 王二雨, 张国华, . 裂隙煤岩组合体单轴压缩力学响应及失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2633-2652.
[3] 张杰, 聂如松, 黄茂桐, 谭永长, 李亚峰, . 道砟嵌入路基土三轴试验及离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1720-1730.
[4] 蒋中明, 石兆丰, 杨雪, 田湘, 肖喆臻, 刘琛智, 黄湘宜, . 聚氨酯类聚合物砂浆−混凝土界面黏结性能与变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3545-3554.
[5] 骆赵刚, 丁选明, 欧强, 蒋春勇, 方华强, . 土工格栅加筋珊瑚砂的强度及变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1053-1064.
[6] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 峰前循环剪切作用下岩石节理剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 52-62.
[7] 雷勇, 李鹏甲, 刘泽宇, 李金朝, 胡伟. 岩溶区穿越溶洞基桩屈曲临界荷载计算方法 与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3347-3356.
[8] 崔猛, 符晓, 郑俊杰, 吕苏颖, 熊辉辉, 曾晨, 韩尚宇, . 黄豆脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀多变量试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3027-3035.
[9] 蔡灿, 张沛, 孙明光, 杨迎新, 谢松, 蒲治成, 杨显鹏, 高超, 谭政博, . 油气钻井中的分离式冲击−切削复合破岩机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2535-2544.
[10] 苗胜军, 王辉, 杨鹏锦, 王亚欣, . 近疲劳强度循环荷载对泥质石英粉砂岩 力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2109-2119.
[11] 王爱文, 高乾书, 潘一山, . 煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1230-1244.
[12] 徐鹏飞, 邓华锋, 张恒宾, 彭萌, 李冠野, 姜桥, 陈兴周, . 不同应力水平下砂岩时滞性单轴压缩破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3041-3050.
[13] 周翠英, 梁彦豪, 刘春辉, 刘镇, . 天然红层风化土成膜试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 132-138.
[14] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[15] 宋宇, 刘保国, 刘浩, 孙景来, 于明圆, 任大瑞, . 基于变形与脆性特性的类岩石材料 配比正交试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2675-2684.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!