岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 539-550.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0879

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究

裴媛媛1, 2,龙建辉1,郭师苡1, 3,安成纪1, 4,翁杭雨1,张吉宁5   

  1. 1. 太原理工大学 矿业工程学院,山西 太原 030024;2. 山西省第三地质工程勘察院有限公司,山西 榆次 030620; 3. 山西省交通新技术发展有限公司,山西 太原 030006;4. 中国电建集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司,陕西 西安 710065; 5. 山西冶金岩土工程勘察有限公司,山西 太原 030000
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-15 接受日期:2024-10-08 出版日期:2025-02-10 发布日期:2025-02-11
  • 通讯作者: 龙建辉,男,1972年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地质灾害方面的教学与研究。E-mail: longjianhei@163.com
  • 作者简介:裴媛媛,女,1999年生,硕士,主要从事地质灾害、岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: peiyuanyuan1@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山西省自然科学基金面上项目(No. 202103021224112)

Model test study on stress-strain characteristics of angled reinforced soil retaining wall under different loads

PEI Yuan-yuan1, 2, LONG Jian-hui1, GUO Shi-yi1, 3, AN Cheng-ji1, 4, WENG Hang-yu1, ZHANG Ji-ning5   

  1. 1. School of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 2. Shanxi Provincial Third Institute of Geological Engineering Investigation, Yuci, Shanxi 030620, China; 3. Shanxi Transportation New Technology Development Co., Ltd., Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, China; 4. PowerChina Northwest Engineering Corporation Limited, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710065, China; 5. Shanxi Metallurgical Geotechnical Engineering Survey Co., Ltd., Taiyuan, Shanxi 030000, China
  • Received:2024-07-15 Accepted:2024-10-08 Online:2025-02-10 Published:2025-02-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Project of Shanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (202103021224112).

摘要: 不同于线性的路基填土挡墙,黄土山区因新建场地产生了为数不少的以折角形式出现的加筋土挡墙,而挡墙上部往往因修建工业厂房(矩形荷载)或道路(条形荷载),折角处更容易产生变形破坏,影响其使用寿命。为了研究矩形荷载和条形荷载对折角式加筋土挡墙拐角部位的作用效应,建立折角直立式加筋土挡墙的物理模型,探究墙内土压力分布和墙体位移的变形规律。试验结果表明:(1)在两种荷载作用下,挡墙拐角-直线过渡段的土压力分布差异显著,在矩形荷载作用下,最大垂直土压力出现在拐角部位,并且从拐角向两端逐渐降低,而在条形荷载作用下,整体没有出现显著波动,仅在挡墙顶部沿墙背表现出逐渐减小的趋势;(2)加筋土挡墙在不同荷载作用下挡墙折角段的水平变形均呈现鼓肚状,竖向变形均随荷载增加至80 kPa后增长放缓,宏观变形裂缝均表现为对数螺旋形且沿拐角角平分线呈对称分布。该研究成果可为类似折角结构的加筋土挡墙优化设计提供理论依据。

关键词: 加筋土挡墙, 拐角部位, 荷载, 模型试验, 黄土

Abstract: In the loess mountainous area, many reinforced soil retaining walls are constructed with corners, unlike linear embankment fill retaining walls, due to new site developments. The upper sections of these walls are more prone to deformation and damage at the corners due to industrial plant (rectangular loads) or road (strip loads) construction, affecting their service life. To investigate the effects of rectangular and strip load types on the corners of folded-angle reinforced earth retaining walls, a physical model with both folded and vertical angles was established to explore soil pressure distribution and wall displacement deformation. The experimental results indicate: (1) A significant difference exists in soil pressure distribution in the transition section between the corner and the straight line of the retaining wall under the two load types. Under rectangular loads, maximum vertical soil pressure occurs at the corner, decreasing towards both ends. In contrast, the retaining wall under strip loads shows no significant fluctuation, only a gradual decrease along the top back of the wall. (2) The horizontal deformation of the reinforced soil retaining wall at the corner section under different loads shows a bulging shape, and the vertical deformation slows down as the load increases to 80 kPa. The macroscopic deformation cracks show a logarithmic spiral shape and are symmetrically distributed along the bisector of the corner angle. The research findings provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the design of reinforced soil retaining walls with similar folded angle structures.

Key words: reinforced soil retaining wall, corner parts, loads, model test, loess

中图分类号: TU 476
[1] 潘申鑫, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 刘先峰, 何梓雷, 曹丽君, 周诗广, . 高速铁路整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙地震作用下服役性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[2] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[3] 郅彬, 魏园钧, 王番, 张茜, 刘存利, 任会明, . 冻融循环作用下含Na2SO4盐原状黄土宏观强度与微观结构关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[4] 吴子龙, 俞韬, 闫超, 邓永锋, 胡广青, 高宇航, 王璋, 王力, . 陕西黄土重金属污染分析与黄土/膨润土隔离墙处治初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2738-2748.
[5] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[6] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[7] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[8] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[9] 鄂天龙, 崔强, 孙志亮, 冯杨州, 李冰臻, 缪栋, 杨健, 苗田, . 新型短柱斜桩复合基础结构优化与承载机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[10] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[11] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[12] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[13] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[14] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[15] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!