岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 3755-3767.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0651

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于短梁−弹簧模型的盾构隧道施工期上浮变形计算方法

李文博,甘晓露,刘念武,吴昊,谌珊珊   

  1. 浙江理工大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 杭州 310018
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-27 接受日期:2024-08-30 出版日期:2024-12-09 发布日期:2024-12-05
  • 通讯作者: 刘念武,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事地下结构工程环境影响方面的研究。E-mail: zjulnw@163.com
  • 作者简介:李文博,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事盾构隧道施工环境效应方面的研究。E-mail: lwbmtjb@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52078466);浙江省自然科学基金(No.LQ24E080008)。

Calculation of uplift deformation during shield tunnel excavation based on a short beam-spring model

LI Wen-bo, GAN Xiao-lu, LIU Nian-wu, WU Hao, SHEN Shan-shan   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China
  • Received:2024-05-27 Accepted:2024-08-30 Online:2024-12-09 Published:2024-12-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078466) and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LQ24E080008).

摘要: 盾构隧道在掘进过程中易出现管片上浮问题,为更加真实地描述施工期盾构隧道在上浮力作用下产生的管片环间错台变形和张开变形,提出基于短梁−弹簧模型的盾构隧道上浮变形理论计算方法。首先,引入Euler-Bernoulli短梁和环间接头弹簧模拟盾构隧道纵向结构,通过设置边界弹簧考虑盾构机盾尾对管片的任意约束作用;之后,采用有限差分理论推导得到施工期上浮力作用下盾构隧道上浮变形解答;最后,对比实际工程案例和数值模型结果以及传统等效梁计算结果验证了计算方法的正确性和有效性,并探明了理论计算模型中关键参数的敏感性,进一步讨论了浆液未凝固段长度、管片环间接头弹簧刚度以及地基弹性模量对隧道上浮变形规律的影响。研究结果表明:与传统连续梁模型结果相比,新方法可以真实地反映盾构隧道的非连续性变形性状,定量分析管片环环间的错台变形和张开变形;通过参数分析可知,浆液未凝固段长度的增长会明显增大盾构隧道上浮变形最大值和变形影响范围;适当提高环间接头的剪切刚度和转动刚度可以有效降低隧道上浮位移、管片环间错台变形和张开变形;在地基弹性模量较小的软弱地层中盾构隧道施工期的上浮变形更不易控制。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 管片上浮, 环间接头, 理论计算, 有限差分法

Abstract: Tunnel lining uplift frequently arises during shield tunneling excavation. To accurately characterize the dislocation between adjacent rings and joint openings induced by uplift pressure during shield tunneling, we propose a theoretical calculation method for uplift deformation of shield tunnels based on the short beam-spring model. Initially, we establish Euler-Bernoulli short beams and joint springs to simulate the longitudinal structure of shield tunnels, considering the arbitrary restraining effect of the shield tail through boundary springs. Subsequently, we apply the finite difference theory to derive the uplift deformation of shield tunnels under uplift forces during tunneling. Ultimately, we validate the correctness and effectiveness of the method through comparisons with engineering cases, numerical modeling results, and traditional equivalent beam calculations. We discuss the sensitivities of key parameters, analyzing the influence of the unconsolidated zone length, circumferential joint stiffness, and modulus of elasticity on the deformation pattern of tunnel uplift. The results indicate that, compared to conventional continuous beam models, our calculation method accurately reflects discontinuous deformation characteristics and reasonably captures the dislocation between adjacent rings and joint openings. Analysis of related parameters reveals that increasing the length of the unconsolidated zone significantly enhances both the maximum uplift deformation and its range of influence. Appropriately increasing the shear and rotational stiffness of circumferential joints can mitigate uplift displacement and reduce dislocation between adjacent rings and joint openings. The uplift deformation of shield tunnels in weak strata with low modulus of elasticity is more difficult to control.

Key words: shield tunnel, lining uplift, circumferential joint, theoretical calculation, finite difference method

中图分类号: TU454
[1] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[2] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[3] 宋牧原, 杨明辉, 陈伟, 卢贤锥, . 基于自注意力-循环神经网络模型的盾构引发的土体沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[6] 谢立夫, 关振长, 黄明, 丘华生, 许超. 考虑主动铰接的盾构-地层相互作用模型及求解研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3574-3584.
[7] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[8] 黄大维, 刘家璇, 谭满生, 邓翔浩, 黄永亮, 翁友华, 陈升平, . 盾构隧道底部注浆抬升模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 371-381.
[9] 王小刚, 杨建平, 陈卫忠, 李慧, . 盾构隧道结构响应特征及接缝刚度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 485-495.
[10] 张治国, 沃巍, 朱正国, 韩凯航, 孙苗苗, . 考虑衬砌截面协调变形约束的既有隧道受盾构下穿施工影响的Fourier能量变分解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1397-1411.
[11] 张治国, 罗杰, 朱正国, PAN Y T, 孙苗苗, . 基于极限分析上限法的地震作用下分层地基 盾构隧道开挖面稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1201-1213.
[12] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[13] 黄继辉, 秦世康, 赵昱, 陈景煦, 张浩, . 压气法盾构仓内气压与围岩气−液两相流相互作用模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3555-3565.
[14] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 李爽, 许凯. 基于LightGBM-Informer的盾构隧道管片上浮长时间序列预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3791-3801.
[15] 任璐瑶, 吴镇杰, 黄啟超, 关振长. 考虑轴力影响的盾构隧道纵向地震响应解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2971-2980.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!