岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 3768-3778.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0187

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于符号回归算法的结构性砂土损伤规律研究

蒋明镜1, 2,张卢丰1,韩亮1,姜朋明1   

  1. 1. 苏州科技大学 土木工程学院,江苏 苏州 215011;2. 同济大学 土木工程学院,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-06 接受日期:2024-03-26 出版日期:2024-12-09 发布日期:2024-12-05
  • 通讯作者: 韩亮,男,1994年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩土工程可靠度分析、机器学习在岩土工程中的应用、深海天然气水合物安全开采方面的研究工作。E-mail: hanliang2023@mail.usts.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:蒋明镜,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,国家杰青,主要从事宏微观土力学与岩土工程数值分析方法方面的研究工作。E-mail: mingjing.jiang@usts.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.52331010);国家重点研发计划(No.2022YFC3003403);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划(No.SJCX22_1591)。

Damage law of structured sand using symbolic regression algorithm

JIANG Ming-jing1, 2, ZHANG Lu-feng1, HAN Liang1, JIANG Peng-ming1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215011, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2024-02-06 Accepted:2024-03-26 Online:2024-12-09 Published:2024-12-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52331010), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3003403) and the Jiangsu Provincial Graduate Research and Practice Innovation Program (SJCX22_1591).

摘要: 破损参数是用来描述岩土材料由胶结状态向无胶结状态转化的变量,合理地描述结构性土的破损演化规律是建立结构性土本构模型的关键。目前,大多损伤规律的研究先假设破损参数的表达式,随后通过拟合室内试验结果获取相关参数,从而确定损伤规律,这些损伤规律的合理性及适用性有待验证。为得到统一的具有微观意义的结构性砂土损伤规律显式数学表达式,提出了一种基于符号回归的损伤规律预测模型。首先,基于具有微观物理意义的破损参数定义式,建立不同离散元(distinct element method,DEM)损伤数据库。其次,采用组合输入变量的方法在等向压缩和等p真三轴压缩应力路径上进行参数筛选(p为平均有效应力),结合基于遗传编程的符号回归(genetic programming-based symbolic regression,GPSR)算法,得到不同复杂度的损伤表达式。最终对比不同表达式的预测误差和泛化误差,选择表现最好的表达式为结构性砂土损伤规律,即GPSR损伤规律。对比前人经典损伤规律表达式,在不同DEM损伤数据库上进行适用性分析。结果表明,GPSR损伤规律将破损参数表示为塑性偏应变εs、归一化的平均有效应力p/py以及中主应力系数b的函数,可以很好地反映结构性土向重塑土转变的过程;GPSR损伤规律在不同损伤数据库上良好的预测精度进一步证明了其在不同岩土材料上的适用性。研究成果对建立结构砂土本构模型具有一定参考价值。

关键词: 结构性砂土, 离散单元法, 机器学习, 符号回归, 损伤规律

Abstract: The damage parameter is a variable used to describe the transition of geomaterials from a bonded state to an unbonded state. The correct expression of the damage evolution of structured soil is crucial in establishing constitutive models for structured soils. Currently, research on damage laws typically involves assuming expressions for damage parameters and then fitting these parameters using experimental results to establish the damage law. The rationality and applicability of these damage laws are yet to be validated. To derive a unified expression for the damage law of structured sands incorporating microscopic mechanisms, a prediction model based on symbolic regression is proposed. Firstly, using the definitions of damage parameters with microscopic physical significance, various damage databases are constructed using the distinct element method (DEM). Secondly, preliminary parameter screening is conducted on isotropic compression and constant p true triaxial compression stress paths using a method that combines input variables. p is the average effective stress. Combined with the genetic programming-based symbolic regression (GPSR), damage expressions with different complexities are derived. Finally, the best-performing expression is selected as the damage law for structured sand, namely the GPSR damage law, based on an analysis of prediction and generalization errors. The applicability of different expressions is compared using various DEM damage databases. The results show that the GPSR damage law represents damage parameters as functions of plastic deviatoric strain εs, normalized mean effective stress p/py and coefficient of intermediate principal stress b. It effectively reflects the transition from structured soil to remolded soil. The outstanding prediction ability of the GPSR damage law on different damage databases further demonstrates its applicability to various geomaterials. The research findings are valuable to establish constitutive models for structured sands.

Key words: structured sand, distinct element method (DEM), machine learning, symbolic regression, damage law

中图分类号: TU442
[1] 江晓童, 张西文, 吕颖慧, 李仁杰, 江浩, . 机器学习在岩土工程中的应用现状与未来展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[2] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[3] 真嘉捷, 赖丰文, 黄明, 廖清香, 李爽, 段岳强. 基于时序聚类和在线学习的盾构掘进地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[4] 王辉, 钮新强, 马刚, 周伟, . 干湿循环作用下堆石料宏细观力学特性的离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 665-676.
[5] 贺隆平, 姚囝, 王其虎, 叶义成, 凌济锁, . 基于自动机器学习的岩爆烈度分级预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[6] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[7] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[8] 邓志兴, 谢康, 李泰灃, 王武斌, 郝哲睿, 李佳珅, . 基于粗颗粒嵌锁点高铁级配碎石振动压实质量控制新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[9] 张冬梅, 张学亮, 杜伟伟, . 基于离散单元法的渗流侵蚀作用下桩基位移与承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1181-1189.
[10] 毛佳, 余健坤, 邵琳玉, 赵兰浩. 三维可变形圆化多面体离散单元法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 908-916.
[11] 刘新荣, 王浩, 郭雪岩, 罗新飏, 周小涵, 许彬, . 考虑消落带岩体劣化影响的典型危岩岸坡稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 563-576.
[12] 潘秋景, 吴洪涛, 张子龙, 宋克志, . 基于多域物理信息神经网络的复合地层隧道掘进地表沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[13] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 孙少锐, 魏继红, . 间歇式滑坡变形力学机制与单体预警案例研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 593-602.
[14] 董学超, 郭明伟, 王水林, . 基于LightGBM的超大沉井下沉状态预测及传感器优化布置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1789-1799.
[15] 周洋诗琦, 赵兰浩, 邵琳玉, 毛佳. 可变形圆化多边形离散单元法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1961-1968.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!