岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 467-478.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0376

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究

吴学震1,夏亚歆1,李大勇1, 2,游先辉3,单宁康3,肖贞科4,陈祥5   

  1. 1. 福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350108;2. 中国石油大学(华东)储运与建筑工程学院,山东 青岛 266580; 3. 福建德亚新能源科技有限公司,福建 福州 350005;4. 福建省国筑建设工程有限公司,福建 福州 350804; 5. 中兴华骏建设有限公司,福建 泉州 362000
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-29 接受日期:2024-09-18 出版日期:2025-02-10 发布日期:2025-02-11
  • 通讯作者: 李大勇,男,1971年生,博士,教授,主要从事海洋岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: ldy@upc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:吴学震,男,1988年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩土工程方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail: wu@fzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52179098,No. 41907251);国家重点研发计划青年科学家项目(No. 2024YFC2911000)。

Experiment on shear strength of inner interface of a new type stiffened deep mixed pile

WU Xue-zhen1, XIA Ya-xin1, LI Da-yong1, 2, YOU Xian-hui3, SHAN Ning-kang3, XIAO Zhen-ke4, CHEN Xiang5   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China; 2. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China; 3. Fujian Deya New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, China; 4. Fujian Guozhu Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, Fujian 350804, China; 5. Zhongxing Huajun Construction Co., Ltd., Quanzhou, Fujian 362000, China
  • Received:2024-03-29 Accepted:2024-09-18 Online:2025-02-10 Published:2025-02-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52179098, 41907251) and the National Key Research and Development Program Young Scientist Project (2024YFC2911000).

摘要: 传统劲性水泥土复合桩的内芯多采用预应力混凝土管桩,其仅依靠内外芯的摩擦和黏结来传递荷载。现场调研发现,水泥土桩与管桩界面的胶结力较小,依据规范进行设计时,内界面抗剪强度往往取值很低。针对此种情况,将内芯预应力混凝土管桩替换为钢管桩,探寻其与外芯水泥土桩间界面的抗剪强度,同时又提出将外表面具有螺旋叶片的钢管桩作为新型内芯桩。针对内芯为无肋钢管及螺旋叶片钢管的桩段试样进行了内界面剪切试验,分析了内界面极限剪切力的影响因素并进行了定量数据表征。获得了新型组合桩的内外芯剪切破坏模式及内界面抗剪强度参数的演化规律和计算方法,从而对《劲性复合桩技术规程》(JG/T 023-2007)桩体承载力计算公式中的内界面抗剪强度参数取值进行了修正。

关键词: 劲性水泥土复合桩, 钢管桩, 螺旋叶片, 内界面抗剪强度, 模型试验, 规范参数修正

Abstract: The inner core of traditional stiffened deep mixed piles is typically a prestressed concrete cylinder, relying solely on friction and bonding between the inner and outer cores to transmit load. Field investigations reveal that the bonding force between the soil-cement pile and the tubular pile interface is minimal. When the design is carried out according to specifications, the shear strength of the inner interface is often significantly low. To address this issue, the inner core prestressed concrete cylinder is replaced with a steel pipe pile, and the shear strength of the interface between the inner core prestressed concrete pipe pile and the outer core cement-soil pile is investigated. Additionally, a steel pipe pile with spiral blades on its outer surface is proposed as a new type of inner core pile. Shear tests on the internal interface were conducted on pile section samples with inner cores of non-ribbed steel pipes and spiral blade steel pipes. The factors influencing the ultimate shear force of the internal interface were analyzed, and the quantitative data were characterized. The shear failure mode of the inner and outer cores of the new composite pile, along with the evolution law and calculation method of the shear strength parameters of the inner interface, were determined. The shear strength parameters of the inner interface in the bearing capacity calculation formula of the pile, as specified in the Technical specification for strength composite piles (JG/T 023-2007), were modified.

Key words: stiffened deep mixed pile, steel pipe pile, spiral blade, shear strength of internal interface, model experiment, specification parameter correction

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[7] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[8] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[9] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!