岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 2121-2134.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0911CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0911

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑能源土软化特性及钻采全过程的井壁稳定半解析模型

吴嘉园1,王华宁1, 2,宋飞1,胡韬1,蒋明镜2   

  1. 1.同济大学 航空航天与力学学院,上海 200092;2.苏州科技大学 土木工程学院,江苏 苏州,215009
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-22 接受日期:2025-03-02 出版日期:2025-07-10 发布日期:2025-07-08
  • 通讯作者: 王华宁,女,1975年生,博士,教授、博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程解析理论与数值方法的研究工作。E-mail: wanghn@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:吴嘉园,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事天然气水合物开采相关的研究工作。E-mail: 2332746@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.12272274)

A semi-analytical wellbore stability model considering strain-softening behaviors of energy-related sediments and the entire exploitation process

WU Jia-yuan1, WANG Hua-ning1, 2, SONG Fei1, HU Tao1, JIANG Ming-jing2   

  1. 1. School of Aerospace Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215009, China
  • Received:2024-07-22 Accepted:2025-03-02 Online:2025-07-10 Published:2025-07-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12272274).

摘要: 天然气水合物被认为是21世纪最有潜力代替煤炭、石油和常规天然气的新型清洁能源之一。然而,如何科学合理地预测天然气水合物钻采全过程的多物理场演化过程仍然是科学界和工程界面临的一个重大挑战。综合考虑了水合物钻采全过程,建立了一个基于时间迭代的多物理场耦合半解析模型。该模型可以综合考虑渗流、传热和力场的参数与水合物饱和度的耦合机制,同时考虑了深海能源土在开采过程中的剪胀和峰后行为。数值比对中,半解析解与基于有限元模拟的数值结果一致,验证了半解析模型的正确性。计算结果表明,适当降低降压速率有利于增加产气量,适当升高降压速率有利于开采安全。与传统的理想弹塑性以及弹脆塑性模型相比,采用的应变软化峰后模型可以提高深海水合物开采过程中安全性能的预测能力。

关键词: 天然气水合物, 半解析模型, 多场耦合, 应变软化, 降压法

Abstract: Natural gas hydrate is widely recognized as one of the most promising clean energy alternatives with the potential to replace coal, petroleum and conventional natural gas in the 21st century. However, it still remains a major challenge to accurately analyze multi-physical field evolutions in the entire exploitation process. In this study, based on the time-updating approach, a semi-analytical model is developed within a multi-physical coupling framework. This model comprehensively considers the entire exploitation process, including both the drilling and support phases. Specifically, the proposed model is capable of analyzing the interactions between hydraulic flow, heat transfer, mechanical properties and hydrate saturations. Meanwhile, more actual mechanical properties of hydrate are incorporated in this model, such as shear expansion and strain-softening post-failure behaviours. As a verification step, a good agreement is observed between the results obtained by numerical predictions and those derived from the developed semi-analytical model. In parametric analyses, it is found that appropriately reducing the depressurization rate is beneficial for increasing gas production, while appropriately increasing the depressurization rate can enhance extraction safety. Interestingly, compared to the classical elastic-perfectly-plastic or elasto-brittle-plastic models, the developed strain-softening model can significantly improve the predicting ability to assess the safety performance during the extraction process.

Key words: methane hydrate, semi-analytical model, multi-physics coupling, strain-softening, depressurization

中图分类号: O 242
[1] 李林, 张等红, 张淼, 顾晓强, 徐龙飞, . 考虑水-力耦合的桩-非饱和黄土接触面荷载传递模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
[2] 张佩, 杨承儒, 侯世伟, 杜修力, . 基于内聚力单元的土石混合体细观数值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1620-1631.
[3] 叶为民, 卢普怀, 崔林勇, 王琼, 陈永贵, . 缓冲材料气体突破试验与模型研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3007-3017.
[4] 蒋宇静, 颜鹏, 栾恒杰, 刘明康, 梁伟, 杜晓宇, 马先壮, 史一辰, . 不同降压速率下天然气水合物垂直井分段降压开采特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2682-2694.
[5] 黄楠, 朱斌, 王路君, . 考虑水合物孔隙赋存模式演化的含水合物沉积物渗透率模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2387-2396.
[6] 黄佳佳, 蒋明镜, 王华宁, . 中国南海神狐海域水合物储层井壁稳定可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1505-1516.
[7] 豆红强, 谢森华, 简文彬, 王浩, 郭朝旭, . 球状风化花岗岩类土质边坡土-岩界面优势流潜蚀特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 950-960.
[8] 叶智刚, 王路君, 朱斌, 陈云敏, . 基于OpenGeoSys的天然气水合物降压开采热-水-力耦合分析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3191-3202.
[9] 赵顺利, 杨之俊, 傅旭东, 方正, . 考虑应变局部化的粗粒料剪切损伤力学机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 31-42.
[10] 周春旭, 张水涛, 贺甲元, 代晓亮, 李丽君, 王琳琳, . 南海天然气水合物储层多孔弹性力学研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 375-382.
[11] 董建华, 徐斌, 吴晓磊, 连博, . 隧道分级让压支护作用下围岩 弹塑性变形全过程解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2123-2135.
[12] 焦钰祺, 贺林林, 梁越, 刘旭菲, . 考虑结构性黏土应变软化效应的 桩靴竖向承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1374-1382.
[13] 王永红, 杜文, 张国辉, 宋扬, . 基于广义张−朱强度准则的深埋隧道 围岩塑性分析及应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 819-830.
[14] 魏天宇, 王旭宏, 吕涛, 胡大伟, 周辉, 洪雯. 湿化膨胀与掺砂率对混合型缓冲材料 THM耦合过程的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 549-562.
[15] 朱文波, 戴国亮, 王博臣, 龚维明, 孙捷, 胡皓, . 吸力式沉箱底部土体循环特性 及其等效循环蠕变模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 466-478.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!