岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 477-490.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0470CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0470

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑初衬−二衬界面效应下隧道地震易损性研究

赵武胜1, 2,周帅1, 2,解佩瑶1, 2,高厚1, 2,秦长坤1, 2,陈卫忠1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-16 接受日期:2024-06-30 出版日期:2025-08-08 发布日期:2025-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 陈卫忠,男,1968年生,博士,研究员,主要从事地下工程灾变力学与防控方面的研究。E-mail: wzchen@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:赵武胜,男,1987年生,博士,研究员,主要从事隧道工程震害机制与防控方面的研究。E-mail: wszhao@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42477208);湖北省自然科学基金杰出青年项目(No.2024AF072);中国科学院青年创新促进会(No.2022332);岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室基金(No.SKLGME-JBGS2402)。

Seismic fragility of tunnels considering primary-secondary lining interface effect

ZHAO Wu-sheng1, 2, ZHOU Shuai1, 2, XIE Pei-yao1, 2, GAO Hou1, 2, QIN Chang-kun1, 2, CHEN Wei-zhong1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2024-04-16 Accepted:2024-06-30 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-09-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42477208), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2024AF072), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2022332) and the Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety (SKLGME-JBGS2402).

摘要: 准确分析隧道的地震易损性是高烈度区隧道工程震害风险管控的前提。复合式衬砌结构在强震区隧道工程中广泛应用,但已有隧道地震易损性分析方法未考虑含防水板初衬−二衬界面的非连续力学行为。为此,开展了含防水板初衬−二衬混凝土界面的直剪试验,建立了界面的接触力学模型及仿真程序;采用增量动力有限元分析方法研究了复合式衬砌隧道的地震易损性。结果表明:直剪过程中,随着剪切位移的增加,界面剪应力先后经历线性增长、非线性增长、损伤演化下降及摩擦滑移4个阶段。防水板降低了界面的刚度与强度。当界面法向应力处于0.3~2.0 MPa区间时,抗剪强度随法向应力呈线性增长,摩擦角约23.7º,黏聚力约0.18 MPa。地震过程中防水板起到了缓冲和吸收变形作用,考虑初衬−二衬界面处位移的非连续效应后,隧道不同损伤等级下直径变形率的阈值增加。忽略初衬−二衬界面效应会低估隧道的抗震性能。研究结果可为高烈度区复合式衬砌隧道的震害风险评价提供参考。

关键词: 复合式衬砌, 界面, 防水板, 地震易损性, 增量动力分析

Abstract: The analysis of tunnel seismic fragility serves as the foundation of seismic risk assessment for tunnels in high-intensity zones. The composite lining structure is commonly adopted in tunnels located in high-intensity zones. Most existing seismic fragility analysis methods for tunnels neglect the displacement discontinuities at the interface between the initial primary-secondary lining, particularly in the presence of a waterproofing board. Consequently, direct shear tests were performed on the primary-secondary liner interface incorporating a waterproofing board. A contact model was developed for the interface, along with its corresponding simulation code. Subsequently, the incremental dynamic analysis method was employed to evaluate the seismic fragility of a composite-lined tunnel. The results reveal that shear stress-shear displacement curves can be categorized into four distinct stages: linear growth, nonlinear growth, damage-induced decrease, and friction slip. The waterproofing board decreases the stiffness and strength of the interface. Under normal stress ranging from 0.3 MPa to 2.0 MPa, shear strength increases linearly with normal stress, with a friction angle of 23.7º and cohesion of 0.18 MPa. The waterproofing layer absorbs deformation during earthquakes, acting as a buffer. Compared with the displacement continuity assumption, considering displacement discontinuities at the primary-secondary liner interface increases damage index thresholds across different damage levels. Ignoring the primary-secondary lining interface effect leads to overestimation of tunnel damage states. This study provides a valuable reference for seismic risk assessment of composite-lined tunnels in high-intensity regions.

Key words: composite lining, interface, waterproofing layer, seismic fragility, incremental dynamic analysis

中图分类号: TU470
[1] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] 侯克鹏, 江帆, 张超, 龚晶汉, . 土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[3] 谈云志, 吴仙桥, 吴军, 明华军, 王冲, 肖宇, . 磷石膏基团粒调控固化淤泥的物理力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1667-1677.
[4] 张佩, 杨承儒, 侯世伟, 杜修力, . 基于内聚力单元的土石混合体细观数值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1620-1631.
[5] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[6] 俞奎, 章敏, 秦文权, 孙静雯, 张开翔, 宋利埼, . 隧道穿越下埋地管线分布式光纤变形及脱空反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 894-904.
[7] 杨柳, 杨铎, 何满潮, . 基于纳米划痕的陆相页岩纹层界面过渡区分布范围定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 353-367.
[8] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[9] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[10] 李利萍, 余泓浩, 李秋雨, 潘一山, . 含水煤块超低摩擦效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3093-3103.
[11] 曹勇, 余飞, 黄康, 戴张俊, 陈善雄, 张志才, . 随机生成粗糙度的岩石-混凝土界面破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 315-326.
[12] 李利萍, 胡学锦, 潘一山, 李明会, . 煤的冲击倾向性对深部煤岩界面超低摩擦效应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1633-1642.
[13] 周攀, 李镜培, 李盼盼, 刘耕云, 张超哲, . 基于界面本构模型的砂土中单桩荷载−沉降响应预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1686-1698.
[14] 叶帅华, 辛亮亮, . 基于桩-土界面剪切特性的单桩沉降和承载问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1457-1471.
[15] 豆红强, 谢森华, 简文彬, 王浩, 郭朝旭, . 球状风化花岗岩类土质边坡土-岩界面优势流潜蚀特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 950-960.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!