岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 491-506.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0375CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0375

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究

聂耀武1,胡兵2,顾雷雨2,李槟3, 4,周全超2, 李文辉1,李琦3, 4,李霞颖3, 4   

  1. 1. 华能庆阳煤电有限责任公司,甘肃 庆阳 745099;2. 华能煤炭技术研究有限公司,北京 100070; 3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071;4. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-29 接受日期:2024-08-08 出版日期:2025-08-08 发布日期:2025-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 李霞颖,女,1990年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事二氧化碳地质利用与封存的力学稳定性评价研究。E-mail: xyli@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:聂耀武,男,1973年生,本科,工程师,主要从事勘测及土木工程建设工作。E-mail: nieyw@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    华能集团总部科技项目(No.HNKJ22-H155)。

Numerical simulation on safety risk assessment of coal mining with CO2 geological storage

NIE Yao-wu1, HU Bing2, GU Lei-yu2, LI Bin3, 4, ZHOU Quan-chao2, LI Wen-hui1, LI Qi3, 4, LI Xia-ying3, 4   

  1. 1. Huaneng Qing Yang Coal and Electricity Co., Ltd., Qingyang, Gansu 745099, China; 2. Huaneng Coal Technology Research Co., Ltd., Beijing 100070, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2024-03-29 Accepted:2024-08-08 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-09-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Technology Project from Huaneng Group (HNKJ22-H155).

摘要: 为评估鄂尔多斯盆地咸水层二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的可行性,开展CO2注入协同煤矿开采安全风险研究。基于有限元数值模拟软件实现CO2注入协同煤矿开采二维流固耦合数值模拟,研究不同CO2注入速率、注入时间以及煤矿开采程度对CO2运移、地层孔压以及垂直变形的影响。考虑CO2注入速率10~70万t/a及煤矿开挖一半和完全开挖,依据控制变量法开展了9种不同条件组合的数值模拟。结果显示,以20万t/a的注入速率注入20 a CO2时:(1)地层稳定性受影响较小,注入过程中上部地层孔压变化量为3.4 MPa,有效应力变化相对于地应力较小;(2)地面隆起程度较小,最大变形为10 mm,位于注入井顶部,煤矿区变形量为7 mm;(3)CO2运移范围较小,运移距离为540 m,距离矿区较远,对煤矿区域影响较小。研究表明,CO2注入速率是影响孔压变化量、变形及CO2运移范围的主要因素,注入速率的提高会增大孔压、变形以及CO2的运移范围;煤矿开挖程度相对于CO2注入产生的影响较小,CO2运移范围几乎不受煤矿开挖影响,孔压、变形随煤矿开挖程度的增大呈小幅度增长趋势。研究结果为评估CO2注入协同煤矿开采安全风险提供了参考依据。

关键词: 二氧化碳地质封存, 煤矿开采, 有限元分析, 流?固耦合, 孔压, 变形, 风险评估

Abstract: To evaluate the feasibility of geological CO2 storage in saline aquifer and overlying coal mining in Ordos Basin, the safety risk study of coal mining with CO2 injection was carried out. Based on the finite element numerical simulation software, the two-dimensional fluid-structure coupling numerical simulation of CO2 injection cooperation in coal mining is realized, and the effects of different CO2 injection rates, injection times and coal mining degrees on CO2 migration, formation pore pressure and vertical deformation are studied. Considering the CO2 injection rate of 100 000−700 000 tons per year and the half and complete excavation of coal, the numerical simulations of 9 different conditions are carried out according to the control variable method. The results show that the injection rate is the main factor affecting the variation of pore pressure, displacement and the migration range of CO2, and the migration range of CO2 is less affected by the overlying load, while the pore pressure and deformation increase with the decrease of the overlying load. The study shows that when injecting CO2 at an annual rate of 200 000 tons for 20 years: (1) The impact on the stability of the formation is relatively small. The change in pore pressure during the injection process in the upper formation is 3.4 MPa, and the change in effective stress is relatively small compared to the in-situ stress. (2) The degree of ground uplift is relatively small. The maximum deformation is 10 mm, located at the top of the injection well, and the deformation in the coal mining area is 7 mm. (3) The range of CO2 migration is relatively small. The migration distance is 540 m, which is far from the mining area and has a relatively small impact on the coal mining area. The study shows that the rate of CO2 injection is the main factor affecting the changes in pore pressure, deformation, and the range of CO2 migration. An increase in the injection rate will increase the pore pressure, deformation, and the range of CO2 migration. The degree of coal mining is relatively small compared to the impact of CO2 injection, the range of CO2 migration is almost unaffected by coal mining, and pore pressure and deformation show a slight increasing trend with the increase in the degree of coal mining. The research findings provide a reference basis for assessing the safety risks associated with the synergistic operation of CO2 injection and coal mining.

Key words: geological CO2 storage, coal mining, finite element analysis, fluid-structure coupling, pore pressure, deformation, risk assessment

中图分类号: TU457
[1] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[2] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[3] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[4] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[5] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[6] 孙红林, 李巍, 汪莹鹤, 黄国良, 廖昕, 黄亮, . 高铁无砟轨道路基上拱变形原因及防治对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[7] 刘瑞, 周舒威, 秦世康, 徐英俊, 何修涵, 冯建业, . 废弃矿井氢储能硐室热−流−固耦合响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 454-466.
[8] 王想君, 李英明, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞, 范朝涛, 付强, . 围岩变形作用下考虑杆体屈服和锚固界面滑移的全长锚固锚杆力学解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2687-2702.
[9] 周雄雄, 黄佳铄, 李若婷, 张建余, . 堆石料湿化变形的修正剑桥模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2703-2710.
[10] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[11] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[12] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[13] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
[14] 熊飞, 刘新荣, 刘文武, 钟祖良, 杨忠平, 王南云, 王浩, 薛熠, . 含深大裂隙陡崖式岩溶山体采动破坏与失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2516-2531.
[15] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!