岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 3549-3561.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.00583CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.00583

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

彭水页岩节理面形貌的分形特征及基于节理粗糙度系数的各向异性表征

董佳斌1, 2,鲁一帆1,金毅1, 2, 3,董文浩1,侯鹏4,刘顺喜1,牛然5   

  1. 1. 河南理工大学 资源环境学院,河南 焦作 454003;2. 河南理工大学 河南省煤系非常规资源成藏与开发重点实验室,河南 焦作 454003; 3. 河南理工大学 河煤炭安全生产与清洁高效利用省部共建协同创新中心,河南 焦作 454003; 4. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072;5. 河南省地质研究院,河南 郑州 450016
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-09 接受日期:2025-05-08 出版日期:2025-11-14 发布日期:2025-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 牛然,男,1990年生,硕士,工程师,主要从事煤田地质及煤层气地质相关研究工作。E-mail: 1144752701@qq.com
  • 作者简介:董佳斌,男,1990年生,博士,讲师,主要从事裂隙型多孔介质渗流、孔隙型介质定量表征方面的研究。E-mail: jiajunfengbin@hpu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42502167, No. 41972175);河南理工大学博士基金(No. B2021-78);河南省杰出青年基金(No. 232300421025);河南省高校基本科研业务费专项(No. NSFRF220427)。

Fractal characteristics of joint surface morphology of Pengshui shale and anisotropic characterization based on joint roughness coefficient

DONG Jia-bin1, 2, LU Yi-fang1, JIN Yi1, 2, 3, DONG Wen-hao1, HOU Peng4, LIU Shun-xi1, NIU Ran5   

  1. 1. School of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454003, China; 2. Henan Key Laboratory of Coal Measure Unconventional Resources Accumulation and Exploitation, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454003, China; 3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Coal Work Safety and Clean High Efficiency Utilization, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454003, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 5. Henan Academy of Geology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450016, China
  • Received:2024-12-09 Accepted:2025-05-08 Online:2025-11-14 Published:2025-11-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science foundation of China (42502167, 41972175), the Doctoral Foundation of Henan Polytechnic University (B2021-78), the Excellent Youth Foundation of Henan Scientific Committee (232300421025) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province (NSFRF220427).

摘要: 岩石节理粗糙度各向异性的定量表征对其力学特性的评估具有重要意义,然而,节理面形貌结构的复杂性以及现有分析方法的局限性给粗糙度计算及各向异性评估带来诸多挑战。以重庆彭水地区的页岩为研究对象,结合分形拓扑理论与节理粗糙度系数JRC(joint roughness coefficient)定量表征节理面形貌各向异性。首先,利用三维激光扫描仪获取了不同劈裂方向的页岩样品表面粗糙形貌;随后,在各个方向上计算了节理剖面线的JRC及分形维数D以比较节理面的各向异性特征。研究结果表明:(1)JRC综合考虑了节理剖面的分形特征与振幅特征,较分形维数D而言,与劈裂方向表现出更强的相关性,以页岩纹理面为参考面,该面与劈裂方向之间的夹角越大,节理面的JRC值越高。(2)单个节理面的JRC值分布可采用椭圆近似拟合,且该椭圆的面积随着纹理面与劈裂方向夹角的增大而增大,这表明当劈裂方向垂直于纹理面时,裂隙面更加粗糙。为岩石节理面各向异性特征的定量表征提供了方法参考,也为劈裂方向对节理面粗糙度控制机制的挖掘提供了新思路。

关键词: 分形拓扑, 分形维数, 劈裂面, 粗糙度, 各向异性

Abstract: Quantitative characterization of the anisotropy of rock joint roughness is crucial for evaluating joint mechanical properties. However, the complex structure of joint surfaces and the limitations of current analytical methods pose significant challenges to roughness calculation and anisotropy evaluation. This study focuses on shale from the Pengshui area in Chongqing, China, combining fractal topography theory and the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) to characterize the anisotropy of joint surfaces. Using a 3D laser scanner, the morphology of joint surfaces from shale samples fractured in different directions was captured. JRC and Fractal Dimension (D) of joint profiles were then calculated in various directions to compare joint surface anisotropy. The results indicate that: (1) JRC, which considers both fractal properties and amplitude characteristics of joint profiles, shows a stronger correlation with fracture orientation than D. Using the bedding plane of shale as a reference, a larger angle between the reference plane and the fracturing direction results in a higher JRC value for the joint surface. (2) The JRC values for a single joint surface can be approximated by an elliptical fit, with the area of the ellipse increasing as the angle between the rock bedding and the fracturing direction increases. This implies that when the fracturing direction is perpendicular to the bedding plane, the fracture surface is rougher. This research provides a reference for characterizing joint surface anisotropy and offers guidance for understanding the relationship between fracturing direction and joint surface roughness.

Key words: fractal topography, fractal dimension, fracture surface, roughness, anisotropy

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[2] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[3] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
[4] 薛熠, 杨博鹍, 刘勇, 孙强, 张云, 曹正正, . 液氮循环冷冲击作用下高温花岗岩I型断裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 422-436.
[5] 赵扬锋, 龚政, 王凯兴, 司绪, 刘玉春, 张丽丽, 梁钦锋, . 不同粗糙度岩石界面断层滑移失稳过程电荷感应信号特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3355-3370.
[6] 吕志涛, 赵志远, 蔡毅, 夏才初, 段君义. 单向冻融作用下砂岩力学各向异性演化与损伤模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3421-3430.
[7] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[8] 曹勇, 余飞, 黄康, 戴张俊, 陈善雄, 张志才, . 随机生成粗糙度的岩石-混凝土界面破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 315-326.
[9] 龚囱, 戚燕顺, 缪浩杰, 肖琦, 熊良锋, 曾鹏, 赵奎, . 考虑裂纹分形维数的平行黏结模型细观参数标定的神经网络模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 327-336.
[10] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[11] 肖劲卿, 温松诚, 郭源, . 基于单孔冲刷测试的黏性土抗侵蚀性及各向异性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 187-198.
[12] 孔洋, 阮怀宁, 汪璋淳, . 模拟柱状节理玄武岩试样的失效模式与各向异性特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 259-266.
[13] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
[14] 胡锦方, 杨启贵, 熊堃, 马刚, 程家林, 周伟, 常晓林, . 软岩筑坝颗粒的破碎特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 359-370.
[15] 苗柯韩, 黄勇, 马晓凡, 王超琦. 基于分形理论的岩体粗糙裂隙中溶质运移预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2527-2538.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!