岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 3562-3573.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1510CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1510

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法

陈怀林1,杨涛1,饶云康1,张哲1,吴红刚2, 3,谢江伟1,滕汉卿1   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 极端环境岩土和隧道工程智能建养全国重点实验室,四川 成都 610031; 2. 中铁西北科学研究院有限公司,甘肃 兰州 730030;3. 中铁科学研究院集团有限公司,四川 成都 610032
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-07 接受日期:2025-03-17 出版日期:2025-11-14 发布日期:2025-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 杨涛,男,1973年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程等方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail: yangtao@swjtu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈怀林,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的科研工作。E-mail: Chenhuailin@my.swjtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国中铁股份有限公司科技研究开发计划(No. 2022-重大专项-07);四川省自然科学基金项目(No. 2025ZNSFSC0305);甘肃省技术创新引导计划-企业研发机构能力建设专项资助(No. 23CXJA0011)

Calculation method of sliding surface stress based on segmented sliding surface stress measurement system

CHEN Huai-lin1, YANG Tao1, RAO Yun-kang1, ZHANG Zhe1, WU Hong-gang2, 3, XIE Jiang-wei1, TENG Han-qing1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Maintenance for Geotechnical and Tunnel Engineering under Extreme Environments, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. China Northwest Research Institute Co., Ltd., of CREC, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, China; 3. China Railway Academy Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610032, China
  • Received:2024-12-07 Accepted:2025-03-17 Online:2025-11-14 Published:2025-11-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Research and Development Plan of China Railway Co., Ltd. (2022–Major Project–07), the National Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2025ZNSFSC0305) and Gansu Province Technology Innovation Guidance Plan-Special Funding for Capacity Building of Enterprise R & D Institutions (23CXJA0011).

摘要: 滑面应力分析是评估滑坡稳定性、预测滑坡风险的关键环节。现有的滑面应力求解方法众多,但尚未有合理的方法可对这些求解方法进行评价。为解决这一难题,提出了一种在滑坡模型试验中使用的滑面应力测试装置,详细介绍了装置的结构特点、设计原理,设计了3个案例,开展了模型试验测试滑面应力,并基于成对样本t检测统计分析结果中的相关性和概率P值,对Morgenstern-Price(M-P)法、基于坡面卸荷的滑面应力弹性理论解、数值分析法在求解滑面应力方面的适用性进行了评价。主要得到了以下结论:(1)斜面测试结果显示,9个滑面测试单元的测试结果与理论值的误差绝对值均在2.5%内,统计学分析结果表明,滑面应力测试装置具有较高的准确性且测试稳定性较好。(2)基于模型试验对3种滑面应力理论计算方法的评价结果显示,弹性理论解和数值分析法可以较准确地计算滑面的应力状态,但M-P法的计算结果与实际偏差较大,不适用于非极限状态下滑面应力的计算。(3)拓展了基于坡面卸荷的滑面应力弹性理论解在路堤边坡中的应用,但该方法仍然存在较大的局限性。提出的滑面应力测试装置拓展了滑面应力测试的新方法,为滑面应力计算和稳定性分析理论准确性验证提供了试验基础。

关键词: 滑坡, 滑面应力, 模型试验, 弹性理论解, 数值分析, 统计分析

Abstract: The stress analysis of sliding surface is the key link to evaluate the stability of slope and predict the risk of landslide. There are many methods to solve the sliding surface stress, but there is no reasonable method to evaluate these methods. In order to solve this problem, a sliding surface stress test device used in landslide model test was proposed. The structural characteristics and design principle of the device were introduced in detail. Three cases were designed to test the sliding surface stress by model test. Based on the correlation analysis and probability P value in the statistical analysis results of paired sample t-test, the applicability of Morgenstern-Price (M-P) method, elastic theoretical solution of sliding surface stress based on slope unloading and numerical analysis method in solving sliding surface stress was evaluated. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The absolute error between the test results and the theoretical values of the 9 sliding surface test units is within 2.5%. The statistical analysis results show that the difference between the test results and the theoretical values is not significant, and the stability of the test results is good. (2) The elastic theoretical solution and numerical analysis method can accurately calculate the stress state of the sliding surface, but the calculation result of the M-P method has a large deviation from the actual one, which is not suitable for the calculation of slip surface stress in non-limit state. (3) The application of sliding surface stress elastic theory solution based on slope unloading in embankment slope is expanded, but this method still has great limitations. The sliding surface stress test device proposed in this paper expands the new method of sliding surface stress test, and provides a guarantee for the accuracy verification of sliding surface stress calculation and stability analysis theory.

Key words: landslide, sliding surface stress, model test, elastic theoretical solution, numerical analysis, statistical analysis

中图分类号: U 416.1+63
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[7] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[8] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[9] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[12] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[13] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[14] 童森杰, 黄茂松, 时振昊, 王滨. 砂土全应变范围非线性特性对贯入大变形问题的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3707-3714.
[15] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 崔明娟, 黄斌彩. 富水砂层酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀防渗加固模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3715-3726.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!