岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 3707-3714.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1615CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1615

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土全应变范围非线性特性对贯入大变形问题的影响分析

童森杰1,黄茂松2, 3,时振昊2, 3,王滨1   

  1. 1. 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司,浙江 杭州 311122;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-31 接受日期:2025-03-05 出版日期:2025-12-11 发布日期:2025-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 黄茂松,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: mshuang@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:童森杰,男,1994年生,博士,主要从事岩土工程数值计算方面的研究工作。E-mail: tong_sj@hdec.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.11972260);中国博士后科学基金(No.2024M763075)。

Influence of full-strain-range non-linearity of sand on cone penetration response

TONG Sen-jie1, HUANG Mao-song2, 3, SHI Zhen-hao2, 3, WANG Bin1   

  1. 1. PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311122, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2024-12-31 Accepted:2025-03-05 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11972260) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024M763075).

摘要: 静力触探试验(cone penetration test,简称CPT)贯入响应不仅与砂土的应力和密度状态相关,还受不同应变水平(10−5~10−1)下的土体非线性应力−应变关系影响。考虑上述关键土体力学响应对于准确模拟CPT贯入至关重要。为此,在砂土状态相关本构模型中引入颗粒间应变弹性模型(intergranular strain elastic model,简称IGS模型),以描述砂土全应变范围内的非线性力学行为。建立了基于上述本构模型和任意拉格朗日−欧拉(arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian,简称ALE)大变形有限元技术的CPT贯入数值模型。ALE技术解决了土体大变形和网格畸变问题。通过对比1g试验结果,首先验证了上述分析模型的可靠性,然后分析了全应变范围内砂土的非线性力学特征对CPT贯入响应的影响。结果表明,较小应变水平下的砂土非线性应力−应变关系对CPT锥尖阻力有显著影响,而对达到稳定贯入阻力所需贯入深度的影响较小。对锥尖阻力的影响归因于远场土体的高刚度和强约束作用,即土体应变随着与锥尖距离的增加而迅速衰减,进而导致远场土体对临近锥尖核心土体的约束作用。进一步,通过小孔扩张问题探讨了远场土体的约束作用,指出了考虑砂土全应变范围非线性力学特性对此类土体深层挤压破坏大变形问题的重要性。

关键词: 砂土, 静力触探试验, 数值分析, 状态相关本构模型, 小应变刚度

Abstract: The penetration response of cone penetration test (CPT) depends on the stress and density states of sand and is also influenced by the non-linear stress-strain relations of soils from very small (10−5) to relatively large (10−1) strain levels. Accounting for these key soil behaviours is crucial for accurate numerical simulations of CPT responses. For this purpose, an intergranular strain (IGS)-based elastic model is introduced into a state-dependent plasticity model to capture the full-strain-range non-linearity behaviour of sand. A numerical model of the CPT penetration process is then established by combining the aforementioned constitutive model and the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) large deformation finite element technique. The latter is adopted to handle the problems of large deformations of soil and mesh distortion. Then the computed response of CPT is compared with 1g test observations, and the numerical model is utilized to analyse the influences of the full-strain-range non-linearity behaviour of sand on the penetration response of CPT. The results indicate that the non-linear stress-strain relations at small strains can have noticeable impacts on the tip resistance of CPT, in particular for loose sand, while having a relatively small influence on the penetration depth required to reach a steady-state penetration resistance. The above influences might be attributed to a rapid decay of soil strains with the distance from the cone tip, and consequently high stiffness and strong constraints effects of far-field soils on core soils adjacent to the cone tip. Furthermore, this paper explores the strong constraint effects of far-field soils through the analysis of the cavity expansion problem, highlighting the significance of full-strain-range non-linearity of sand in addressing large deformation issues related to deep compression failure.

Key words: sand, cone penetration test(CPT), numerical simulations, state-dependent constitutive model, small strain stiffness

中图分类号: TU454
[1] 王宁博, 姚仰平, 刘林, 李翔宇, 毛安琪, 李宁, . 考虑围压效应的砂土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[2] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[3] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[6] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[7] 富海鹰, 钟雨薇, 王孝文, 吴博涵, 袁冉, . 基于次加载面理论的砂土临界状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1788-1798.
[8] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[9] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[10] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[11] 代仲海, 李裕成, 莫品强, 位鑫宇, 蔡国军. 基于静力触探数据的滨海黏土应力历史与强度特性解译研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3913-3923.
[12] 张世殊, 李青春, 刘松玉, 崔德山, 李洪江, 黎伟, 陈盼. 深厚覆盖层孔内原位测试技术现状与展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 4009-4028.
[13] 叶斌, 蒋记澳, 朱家志, 丁源, 林创基. 电解减饱和处理后砂土的非饱和状态稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3673-3682.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!