岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1174-1186.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0860CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0860

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究

罗宣兵1, 2,李清林1, 2,陈文娟3,杨潇飞1, 2,张美雪1, 2   

  1. 1.石河子大学 水利建筑工程学院,新疆 石河子832000;2.石河子大学 寒旱区生态水利工程兵团重点实验室,新疆 石河子832000; 3.石河子大学 理学院,新疆 石河子832000
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-10 接受日期:2024-10-29 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-14
  • 通讯作者: 李清林,男,1991年生,博士,副教授,主要从事寒旱区荒漠植被护坡、岩土多场耦合等方面的研究。E-mail: liql1150142@163.com
  • 作者简介:罗宣兵,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事生态护坡等方面的研究。E-mail: lxb19990925@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(No. 42102312);新疆生产建设兵团青年拔尖人才项目(No. 2024DB050);石河子大学青年创新拔尖人才项目(No. CXBJ202313)。

Freeze-thaw deformation pattern of sandy soil under different moisture contents, freezing temperatures, and Alhagi sparsifolia root contents

LUO Xuan-bing1, 2, LI Qing-lin1, 2, CHEN Wen-juan3, YANG Xiao-fei1, 2, ZHANG Mei-xue1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Water Conservancy and Architecture, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Cold and Arid Regions Eco-Hydraulic Engineering of Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China; 3. College of Science, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832000, China
  • Received:2024-07-10 Accepted:2024-10-29 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars of China (42102312), the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Youth Top-notch Talent Project (2024DB050) and the Young Scholars of Shihezi University Youth Innovation Top-notch Talent Program (CXBJ202313).

摘要: 以新疆天山北麓典型砂土与荒漠植被骆驼刺根系为研究对象,研究不同冻结温度下含水率及骆驼刺根系含量变化对砂土冻融变形的影响,模拟自然冻融条件开展室内单向冻结试验,利用正交试验确定各因素与砂土冻融变形的相关性和显著性,分析砂土在不同含水率、冻结温度和含根量下的冻融变形机制,提出了砂土冻融变形拟合公式。结果表明:3种不同因素对冻融砂土最大变形量影响的主次顺序为含水率>冻结温度>含根量,冻融砂土最大变形量与含水率呈线性正相关,而与冻结温度呈线性负相关,与含根量呈二次函数关系;低含水率素砂土与含根砂土在冻结前期发生冻缩现象,在融化阶段发生融胀现象,而高含水率素砂土与含根砂土在冻结前期发生缓慢冻胀,融化阶段发生融沉现象。基于此规律建立了多因素回归模型,该模型能够较准确地预测冻融砂土的最大变形量,同时能够为寒旱区植被生态护坡的安全评价提供参考。

关键词: 冻融变形, 含根量, 冻结温度, 含水率, 砂土

Abstract: This study focuses on the freeze-thaw deformation of sandy soil under different freezing temperatures, examining the impact of water content and Alhagi sparsifolia root content, using typical sandy soil and the desert vegetation Alhagi sparsifolia root system from the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains in Xinjiang as the research subject. Indoor unidirectional freezing experiments are conducted to simulate natural freeze-thaw conditions, and orthogonal experiments are used to determine the correlation and significance of various factors with the freeze-thaw deformation of sandy soil. The study analyzes the freeze-thaw deformation mechanism of sandy soil under varying water contents, freezing temperatures, and root contents, and proposes a fitting formula for the freeze-thaw deformation of sandy soil. The results show that the order of influence on the maximum deformation of freeze-thaw sandy soil is water content > freezing temperature > root content. The maximum deformation of freeze-thaw sandy soil is positively linearly correlated with water content, negatively linearly correlated with freezing temperature, and exhibits a quadratic function relationship with root content. Low water content bare sandy soil and root-containing sandy soil exhibit freeze shrinkage during the initial freezing stage and thaw expansion in the melting stage, while high water content bare sandy soil and root-containing sandy soil exhibit slow freeze expansion during the initial freezing stage and thaw settlement during the melting stage. A multi-factor regression model is developed based on this pattern, enabling accurate prediction of the maximum deformation of freeze-thaw sandy soil and offering guidance for the safety assessment of vegetation ecological slope protection in cold and arid regions.

Key words: freeze-thaw deformation, root content, freezing temperature, water content, sandy soil

中图分类号: TU 454
[1] 王勇, 顾凯, 张博, 姜霖, 施斌, . 基于分布式温度测试和重建的浅表土体含水率反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 531-540.
[2] 王宁博, 姚仰平, 刘林, 李翔宇, 毛安琪, 李宁, . 考虑围压效应的砂土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[3] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[4] 李新明, 何永飞, 谈云志, 任克彬, 张先伟, 尹松, . 不同含水率下石灰−偏高岭土改良遗址土宏微观特性的冻融循环效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2894-2906.
[5] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[6] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[7] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[8] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[9] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[10] 富海鹰, 钟雨薇, 王孝文, 吴博涵, 袁冉, . 基于次加载面理论的砂土临界状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1788-1798.
[11] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[12] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[13] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[14] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[15] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!