岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 3585-3614.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1564CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1564

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展

赵飞1, 2,石振明1, 2,俞松波1, 2,周圆媛3,李博1, 2, 陈建峰1, 2,张清照1, 2,郑鸿超4   

  1. 1. 同济大学 土木工程学院 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 南京工业大学 交通运输工程学院,江苏 南京 211816;4. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430078
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-18 接受日期:2025-04-29 出版日期:2025-11-14 发布日期:2025-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 李博,男,1981年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩体力学及地质灾害防治方面的研究工作。E-mail:libotj@tongi.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:赵飞,男,1994年生,博士,博士后,主要从事地质灾害与防治研究工作。E-mail:2010326@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2023YFC3008300,No. 2019YFC1509700)

Research progress on dynamic failure and reinforcement of stratified rock slopes

ZHAO Fei1, 2, SHI Zhen-ming1, 2, YU Song-bo1, 2, ZHOU Yuan-yuan3, LI Bo1, 2, CHEN Jian-feng1, 2, ZHANG Qing-zhao1, 2, ZHENG Hong-chao4   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. College of Transportation Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211816, China; 4. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430078, China
  • Received:2024-12-18 Accepted:2025-04-29 Online:2025-11-14 Published:2025-11-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3008300, 2019YFC1509700).

摘要: 层状岩质边坡在强震作用下极易发生破坏,导致崩塌、滑坡、泥石流等地质灾害,其稳定性评价及支护结构优化是工程建设和学术研究关注的重点问题。基于强震区现场调查、理论分析、数值模拟和物理模型试验等技术手段,国内外学者针对强震区岩质边坡破坏机制及加固措施开展了大量卓有成效的研究工作。从层状岩质边坡失稳破坏特征、支护结构类型、支护结构加固机制、新型抗震支护结构等4个方面着手,系统梳理了强震作用下岩质边坡支护结构的研究现状,指明了目前支护结构基础研究与技术手段中存在的不足,展望了今后边坡抗震支护结构的研发方向。研究结果为深入揭示强震区层状岩质边坡失稳机制与加固机制提供了理论支撑,并为研发更可靠的支护结构奠定了科学基础。

关键词: 强震区, 层状岩质边坡, 动力破坏特征, 支护结构, 加固机制

Abstract: Stratified rock slopes are prone to damage under strong earthquake, leading to geological disasters such as crumbling, landslides and debris flow, and their stability evaluation and support structure optimization are key issues for engineering construction and academic research. Based on field investigations, theoretical analyses, numerical simulations and physical model tests in strong earthquake regions, scholars at home and abroad have carried out a lot of fruitful researches on the damage mechanism and reinforcement measures of rock slopes in strong earthquake regions. Starting from four aspects, including destabilization and damage characteristics of laminated rock slopes, types of support structures, reinforcement mechanisms of support structures and new seismic support structures, the research status of rock slope support structures under strong earthquakes is systematically reviewed, the shortcomings in the current basic research and technical methods of support structures are indicated, and the future research and development directions of seismic support structures for slopes are prospected. This study provides theoretical support for revealing the instability mechanisms and reinforcement strategies of stratified rock slopes in strong earthquake regions, while establishing a scientific foundation for developing more reliable support structures.

Key words: strong earthquake region, stratified rock slope, dynamic failure characteristics, support structures, reinforcement mechanism

中图分类号: P 642
[1] 童佳荣, 张曙, 李荣, 夏彬桐, 王宁伟, . 电动化学加固技术对珠海软土改性的机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 262-270.
[2] 兰斌鹏, 王延平, 王卫国, 王义军, 赵跃, . 拉桩支护结构变形及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 551-562.
[3] 崔凯, 于翔鹏, 吴国鹏, 许鹏飞, 葛诚瑞, . 桩-浆联合模式下土遗址裂隙注浆加固机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 607-618.
[4] 黄生根, 张义, 霍昊, 陈常青. 软土地区深基坑支护工程格构柱变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 533-538.
[5] 张聪, 冯忠居, 王富春, 孔元元, 王溪清, 马晓谦, . 强震区软弱土层差异厚度下单桩动力响应振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1100-1110.
[6] 周勇, 赵元基, 王正振, . 基于土体强度冗余法的桩锚支护结构 动态稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 641-649.
[7] 莫品强, 刘尧, 黄子丰, 滕鸿博, 陈斌, 陶祥令, . 复杂支护条件下深基坑支护桩−冠梁−支撑 的变形协调及空间效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2592-2601.
[8] 张聪, 冯忠居, 孟莹莹, 关云辉, 陈慧芸, 王振, . 单桩与群桩基础动力时程响应差异振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1326-1334.
[9] 周泽华, 吕艳, 苏生瑞, 刁钰恒, 王祚鹏, 王剑昆, 赵辉, . 花岗岩质边坡地震动力响应及破坏特征 大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 918-931.
[10] 朱永建, 任恒, 王平, 李鹏, 王希之, 魏明星, . 含单一贯通破裂面岩石注浆试验及加固机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3221-3230.
[11] 崔凯, 于翔鹏, 裴强强, 汪小海, 许鹏飞, . 注浆模式对土遗址裂隙修复浆−土界面 黏结性能影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1501-1511.
[12] 沈宇鹏, 王笃礼, 林园榕, 汤天笑, 刘欣, . 越冬基坑水平冻胀的防治措施效果分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1434-1442.
[13] 雷华阳, 王鹏, 刘旭, 王磊, . 基于气体运移规律的增压式真空预压法 加固机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 943-953.
[14] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[15] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!