Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3267-3279.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.00573

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Rock cracking and evolution mechanism under the action of new type of arc-shaped charge blasting

XU Guo-qing1, HUANG Gao-xiang2, WANG Xie-kang1, LUO Deng-ze3, LI Hong-tao1, YAO Qiang1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China; 2. Sichuan Academy of Water Conservancy, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China; 3. Yalong River Hydropower Development Company, Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610051 China
  • Received:2024-10-17 Accepted:2025-05-08 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3008300, 2023YFC3008305), the Sichuan Provincial International Science and Technology Collaboration & Innovation Project (2025YFHZ0165), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51809188) and the Joint Funds of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2340201).

Abstract: The application of shaped charge blasting in smooth blasting during chamber excavation is investigated. Based on the principle of shaped charge jets, an arc-shaped charge structure is proposed. Numerical modeling of arc-shaped charge blasting (ASCB) is established and compared with cone-shaped charge blasting (CSCB). The findings indicate that ASCB consumes 43.4% less explosive than CSCB, and the efficiency of ASCB in the charge direction surpasses that of CSCB by 25.97%. Upon reaching the blast-hole wall, the shock wave of ASCB is more concentrated than that of CSCB, facilitating the formation of initial cracks in the energy-gathering direction. The pressure exerted by ASCB on the energy-gathering side of the blast-hole wall is 6.26% higher than that of CSCB, whereas the pressure on the non-energy-gathering side is 37.34% lower. The crack length generated by ASCB in the energy-accumulation direction is approximately twice that of CSCB. Consequently, it is concluded that the shaped charge blasting effect of ASCB is superior to that of CSCB. These research outcomes offer a novel approach for directional presplitting blasting.

Key words: ANSYS/LS-DYNA, shaped charge blasting, numerical simulation, fluid-structure coupling, decoupling charge

CLC Number: 

  • TD 235
[1] NIE Yao-wu, HU Bing, GU Lei-yu, LI Bin, ZHOU Quan-chao, LI Wen-hui, LI Qi, LI Xia-ying, . Numerical simulation on safety risk assessment of coal mining with CO2 geological storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[2] SUN Zhi-liang, SHAO Min, WANG Ye-chen-zi, LIU Zhong, REN Wei-zhong, BAI Wei, LI Peng, . Mesoscopic simulation and analysis of influencing factors for ground subsidence induced by leakage through pipeline defect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[3] LI Bin, SHEN Hai-meng, LI Qi, LI Xia-ying, . A numerical simulation of dynamic evolution of permeability during granite shear process under different confining pressures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[4] ZHANG Qi, WANG Ju, LIU Jiang-feng, CAO Sheng-fei, XIE Jing-li, CHENG Jian-feng, . Core disposal elements spacing design for high-level radioactive waste repository under coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[5] ZHU Xian-xiang, ZHANG Qi, MA Jun-peng, WANG Yong-jun, MENG Fan-zhen, . Diffusion mechanism of seepage grouting in water-bearing sand layer under slurry-water replacement effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[6] LIANG Qing-guo, LI Jing, ZHANG Chong-hui, LIU Tong-tong, SUN Zhi-tao, . Mechanical response of tunnel lining in loess-mudstone composite strata under uniform expansion of foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[7] YANG Ming-yun, CHEN Chuan, LAI Ying, CHEN Yun-min. Bearing capacity analysis of piggy-backed anchors under three-dimensional loading in clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[8] ZHANG Ling-bo, SUN Yi-song, CHENG Xing-lei, GUO Qun-lu, ZHAO Chuan, LIU Jing-hong. Characterization method for the three-dimensional soil cutting failure surface based on damage energy dissipation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[9] ZHANG Xin-ye, LIU Zhi-wei, WENG Xiao-lin, LI Xuan-cong, ZHAO Jian-chong, LIU Xiao-guang. Stability and failure mode analysis of tunnel face in composite ground with upper sand and lower clay layers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[10] WU Di, CHEN Rong, KONG Gang-qiang, NIU Geng, MIAO Yu-song, WANG Zhen-xing. Field test and numerical simulation on thermo-mechanical response characteristics of a bridge energy row pile under heating-cooling cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[11] WANG Shuai, WANG Yu-hui, WANG Ling, LI Jia-qi, ZHAO Zi-hao, PANG Kai-xuan, . Influence mechanism of rock pore structure and mineral composition on crack propagation based on grain based model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3289-3301.
[12] YANG Li. Numerical analysis and bearing capacity determination criteria of field plate loading tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[13] ZHAO Yang, LU Zheng, YAN Ting-zhou, LI Jian, TANG Chu-xuan, QIU Yu, YAO Hai-lin, . Vibration compaction behaviors and prestressing effect of geocell-reinforced subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[14] XUE Xiu-li, XIE Wei-rui, LIAO Huan, ZENG Chao-feng, CHEN Hong-bo, XU Chang-jie, HAN Lei, . Barrier effect of adjacent deep-buried metro station and its influence on ground settlement induced by foundation pit dewatering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[15] LÜ Mao-lin, ZHU Zhen-de, ZHOU Lu-ming, GE Xin-liang, . Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation in rock masses with pre-existing double fractures using the phase field method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!