Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12): 3768-3778.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0187

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Damage law of structured sand using symbolic regression algorithm

JIANG Ming-jing1, 2, ZHANG Lu-feng1, HAN Liang1, JIANG Peng-ming1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215011, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2024-02-06 Accepted:2024-03-26 Online:2024-12-09 Published:2024-12-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52331010), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3003403) and the Jiangsu Provincial Graduate Research and Practice Innovation Program (SJCX22_1591).

Abstract: The damage parameter is a variable used to describe the transition of geomaterials from a bonded state to an unbonded state. The correct expression of the damage evolution of structured soil is crucial in establishing constitutive models for structured soils. Currently, research on damage laws typically involves assuming expressions for damage parameters and then fitting these parameters using experimental results to establish the damage law. The rationality and applicability of these damage laws are yet to be validated. To derive a unified expression for the damage law of structured sands incorporating microscopic mechanisms, a prediction model based on symbolic regression is proposed. Firstly, using the definitions of damage parameters with microscopic physical significance, various damage databases are constructed using the distinct element method (DEM). Secondly, preliminary parameter screening is conducted on isotropic compression and constant p true triaxial compression stress paths using a method that combines input variables. p is the average effective stress. Combined with the genetic programming-based symbolic regression (GPSR), damage expressions with different complexities are derived. Finally, the best-performing expression is selected as the damage law for structured sand, namely the GPSR damage law, based on an analysis of prediction and generalization errors. The applicability of different expressions is compared using various DEM damage databases. The results show that the GPSR damage law represents damage parameters as functions of plastic deviatoric strain εs, normalized mean effective stress p/py and coefficient of intermediate principal stress b. It effectively reflects the transition from structured soil to remolded soil. The outstanding prediction ability of the GPSR damage law on different damage databases further demonstrates its applicability to various geomaterials. The research findings are valuable to establish constitutive models for structured sands.

Key words: structured sand, distinct element method (DEM), machine learning, symbolic regression, damage law

CLC Number: 

  • TU442
[1] JIANG Xiao-tong, ZHANG Xi-wen, LÜ Ying-hui, LI Ren-jie, JIANG Hao, . Current applications and future prospects of machine learning in geotechnical engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[2] CAI Qi-hang, DONG Xue-chao, GUO Ming-wei, LU Zheng, XU An, JIANG Fan, . Intelligent prediction of sinking of super-large anchorage caisson foundation based on soil pressure at cutting edges [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[3] ZHEN Jia-jie, LAI Feng-wen, HUANG Ming, LIAO Qing-xiang, LI Shuang, DUAN Yue-qiang. Intelligent geological condition recognition in shield tunneling via time-series clustering and online learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[4] HE Long-ping, YAO Nan, WANG Qi-hu, YE Yi-cheng, LING Ji-suo, . Rock burst intensity grading prediction model based on automatic machine learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[5] LONG Xiao, SUN Rui, ZHENG Tong, . Convolutional neural network-based liquefaction prediction model and interpretability analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[6] YANG Yang, WEI Yi-tong. A new method of liquefaction probability level evaluation based on classification tree [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
[7] DENG Zhi-xing, XIE Kang, LI Tai-feng, WANG Wu-bin, HAO Zhe-rui, LI Jia-shen, . A novel method for quality control of vibratory compaction in high-speed railway graded aggregates based on the embedded locking point of coarse particles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[8] PAN Qiu-jing, WU Hong-tao, ZHANG Zi-long, SONG Ke-zhi, . Prediction of tunneling-induced ground surface settlement within composite strata using multi-physics-informed neural network [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[9] WU Shuang-shuang, HU Xin-li, SUN Shao-rui, WEI Ji-hong, . A case study of mechanism for intermittent deformation and early warning of landslides [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 593-602.
[10] DONG Xue-chao, GUO Ming-wei, WANG Shui-lin, . Sinking state prediction and optimal sensor placement of super large open caissons based on LightGBM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1789-1799.
[11] YU Hong, CHEN Xiao-bin, YI Li-qin, QIU Jun, GU Zheng-hao, ZHAO Hui, . Parameter inversion and application of soft soil modified Cambridge model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(11): 3318-3326.
[12] ZHANG Wen-gang, GU Xin, LIU Han-long, ZHANG Qing, WANG Lin, WANG Lu-qi, . Probabilistic back analysis of soil parameters and displacement prediction of unsaturated slopes using Bayesian updating [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[13] LIU Sun, JIANG Ming-jing, FU Chang, ZHU Jun-gao,. Distinct element analysis of cone penetration tests in structured sand ground [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 933-942.
[14] JIANG Ming-jing, ZHOU Wei , LIU Jing-de, LI Tao, . A constitutive model for anisotropic structured sandy soil based on micromechanical mechanism [J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3347-3355.
[15] JIANG Ming-jing , FU Chang , LIU Jing-de , LI Tao , . Discrete element analysis of anisotropic structured sand [J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 577-584.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!