Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3033-3044.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1464

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall

CAI Xiao-guang1, XU Hong-lu1, WANG Hai-yun2, LI Si-han3, LI Ying4   

  1. 1. China Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center, Beijing 100029, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China; 3. College of Geological Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe, Hebei 065201, China; 4. College of Management and Information, Chuzhou City Vocational College, Chuzhou, Anhui 239000, China
  • Received:2024-11-27 Accepted:2025-01-03 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2139207) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778144).

Abstract: Current seismic design specifications for reinforced soil retaining walls primarily derive horizontal seismic coefficients from a limited set of model tests or numerical simulations, without considering the influence of facing type on acceleration amplification coefficient distribution. To address this gap, three sets of shaking table tests were conducted on reinforced soil retaining walls with different facing types, using identical soil and geosynthetic materials. The aim was to investigate the frequency-domain distribution of acceleration responses and the effect of facing type on the acceleration amplification coefficient. The test results show that the reinforcement materials significantly improves soil stiffness and integrity, enhancing the amplification of seismic wave components at both low and high frequencies. The acceleration amplification coefficient increases with height along the wall, and the facing type significantly influences its distribution. Specifically, for wrapped retaining wall with low facing stiffness, the acceleration amplification coefficient decreases as peak acceleration increases, reaching a maximum value of 1.69. In contrast, for modular and integral retaining walls with higher facing stiffness, the acceleration amplification coefficient increases with peak acceleration, reaching the maximum values of 1.84 and 1.37, respectively. Based on these findings, this paper proposes a method for calculating the horizontal seismic coefficients of reinforced soil retaining walls with different facing types using the quasi-static method. The results provide valuable insights for seismic stability analysis of reinforced soil retaining walls.

Key words: reinforced soil retaining wall, different facing types, shaking table test, horizontal seismic coefficient, seismic design

CLC Number: 

  • TU 476.4
[1] PAN Shen-xin, JIANG Guan-lu, YUAN Sheng-yang, LIU Xian-feng, HE Zi-lei, CAO Li-jun, ZHOU Shi-guang, . Service performance of reinforced soil retaining wall with integral rigid facing of high-speed railway under seismic action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[2] LIU Hong-shuai, YANG Jian-sheng, SONG Dong-song, SUN Qiang-qiang, . Centrifuge modeling on ground response of dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[3] DONG Jian-hua, YANG Bo, TIAN Wen-tong, WU Xiao-lei, HE Peng-fei, ZHAO Lü-hua, LIAN Bo, . Research and development of novel anti-slide pile to prevent liquefaction and shaking table model test of seismic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] ZHOU Wen-qiang, JIANG Liang-wei, LUO Qiang, XIAO Zhuo-qi, LUO Yi-lian, WEI Ming, . Shaking table test on seismic performance of anchoring frame beam with flexible external anchor heads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[5] PEI Yuan-yuan, LONG Jian-hui, GUO Shi-yi, AN Cheng-ji, WENG Hang-yu, ZHANG Ji-ning, . Model test study on stress-strain characteristics of angled reinforced soil retaining wall under different loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[6] YANG Yao-hui, XIN Gong-feng, CHEN Yu-min, LI Zhao-feng, . Shaking table test on drainage pile-net composite foundation treated liquefiable subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[7] ZHU Bin, QI Ji-lin, LI Jiang, YANG Yu-sheng, ZHANG Yi-fan, ZHAO Bo-chao, . Analysis of earthquake subsidence and key influencing factors of earth-rock dam based on seismic damage investigation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 619-630.
[8] MA Jian-xun, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, PANG Pan-wang, LI Wen-xiao, YAN Hong-xiang. Effects of basement stories on seismic response of high-rise buildings considering soil-structure interaction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[9] XIE Zhou-zhou, ZHAO Lian-heng, LI Liang, HUANG Dong-liang, ZHANG Zi-jian, ZHOU Jing, . Difference of dynamic responses of soil-rock mixture slopes with different rock contents based on shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[10] HE Zi-lei, JIANG Guan-lu, FENG Hai-zhou, PAN Shen-xin, HE Xiao-long, LI Jie, . Dynamic response characteristics of bedrock and overburden layer slope supported by a combination of pile-sheet wall-anchor cables under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[11] LI Fu-xiu, GUO Wen-hao, ZHENG Ye-wei. Shaking table test of the back-to-back reinforced soil walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[12] ZHU Dan, JIANG Guan-lu, CHEN Hong-yu, ZHAO Xin-hui, HUANG De-gui, LIU Yi-fu, . Shaking table experimental study on the dynamic response characteristics of single and double-row pile-supported road graben slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[13] TAO Zhi-gang, FENG Yu-xiang, ZHAO Yi , ZHANG Xiao-yu , HE Man-chao, LEI Xiao-tian, . Shaking table test on anti-seismic characteristics of NPR anchor cable support system for tunnel crossing faults [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[14] WANG Tong, LIU Xian-feng, YUAN Sheng-yang, JIANG Guan-lu, HU Jin-shan, SHAO Zhu-jie, TIAN Shi-jun. Large-scale shaking table test on the seismic response of dip and anti-dip layered fractured structural slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
[15] ZHANG Cong, FENG Zhong-ju, LIN Lu-yu, ZHOU Gui-mei, CHEN Lu, . Dynamic characteristics and damage evaluation of variable-section single pile in a seismic subsidence site [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!