Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 2785-2797.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1410

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Deformation characteristics of soft clay under unloading rebound and recompression and its engineering application

JIANG Ling-yun1, 2, HU Hui-hua2, 3, WU Le-zhu2, HE Jian-qing2, LI Hong-quan3   

  1. 1. Institute of Technology, Zhangjiajie College, Zhangjiajie, Hunan 427000, China; 2. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 3. Hunan Provincial Communications Planning, Surveying and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Changsha, Hunan 410200, China
  • Received:2025-12-30 Accepted:2026-03-04 Online:2026-08-11 Published:2026-08-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078211), the Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province, China (2025AQ2017) and the Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (24C1343).

Abstract: The unloading-rebound and recompression deformation characteristics of soft clay significantly affects the design and structural safety of deep foundations, as well as embankments and culvert passages constructed on preloaded soft subgrades subjected to reverse excavation. To investigate the underlying mechanisms, this study conducted a systematic experimental investigation into the unloaded rebound and recompression behaviors of soft clay from Anxiang, Dongting Lake. The theoretical findings were applied to engineering practice subsequently. The results reveal a clear three-stage evolution of rebound deformation with increasing unloading ratio R: when R≤0.2, the rebound rate  is extremely low, corresponding to a rebound incubation period; when 0.20.8,  rises sharply, indicating an accelerated development stage. The critical unloading ratio Rcr of the soil is 0.2, and the ultimate unloading ratio Ru is 0.8. The rebound rate  is significantly influenced by the preloading history. Under the same unloading ratio, a higher preloading load leads to a higher . The maximum rebound rate max after unloading shows a strong linear correlation with the preloading load pmax. The relationship curves between the rebound modulus Ec and the unloading ratio R (Ec-R and lgEc-R) exhibit two linear segments. The inflection points of these curves, with horizontal coordinates slightly greater than Rcr and close to Ru, respectively, effectively define the stable deformation zone and the significant rebound development zone. The recompression ratio r and the reloading ratio R′ show a nonlinear increasing relationship, which can also be divided into three stages and well fitted by a cubic polynomial without a constant term. A formula for calculating the rebound and recompression deformation of deep foundation pits was established based on the r-R′ relationship. Using Ru and Rcr as boundaries, the soil at the bottom of a foundation pit was categorized into strong, moderate, and non-rebound zones. The critical depth of the rebound zone (i.e., the neutral point depth of piles) was determined, and a formula for calculating the ultimate uplift load of foundation piles at the pit bottom was proposed. These findings providing a quantitative basis for the accurate calculation and risk control of rebound and recompression deformation of soft clay foundation pits, and has been applied in engineering projects such as highway culverts and passages in the Dongting Lake area.

Key words: soft clay, unloading rebound, recompression deformation, settlement, uplift load

CLC Number: 

  • TU 411
[1] WANG Heng, LIN Xiu-hong, XIAO Gui-jin, CHEN Jun-hao, WANG Gang, SONG Miao-miao. Evolution of sedimentation rate and settlement prediction for dredged slurry under self-weight [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(3): 828-838.
[2] QIAO Ya-qing, SHI Zhen-hao, HUANG Mao-song, ZHANG Zhong-jie, WANG Hao-ran. Intergranular-strain elastoplastic modeling of small-strain clay stiffness and deep excavation response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(3): 929-938.
[3] LI Chun-lei, HU Chun-hong, YU Long. Large-deformation numerical analysis of lateral pipe-soil interaction in deep-sea pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(1): 314-322.
[4] ZHANG Zhi-guo, CHEN Yin-ji, ZHU Zheng-guo, WEI Gang, SUN Miao-miao, . Analytical solution for settlement of viscoelastic ground induced by small curvature shield tunnel excavation in soft soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 309-321.
[5] PAN Shen-xin, JIANG Guan-lu, YUAN Sheng-yang, LIU Xian-feng, HE Zi-lei, CAO Li-jun, ZHOU Shi-guang, . Service performance of reinforced soil retaining wall with integral rigid facing of high-speed railway under seismic action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[6] FENG De-luan, YU Yang, LIANG Shi-hua. Research progress and review on strength and water stability of alkali-activated cementitious material solidified coastal soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[7] BAO Shu-feng, DONG Zhi-liang, MO Hai-hong, ZHANG Jin-wen, YU Li-ting, LIU Pan, LIU Xiao-qiang, HOU Ming-xun, . Calculation of static batch settlement and low-pressure consolidation settlement of suspended and fluid mud [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[8] SONG Mu-yuan, YANG Ming-hui, CHEN Wei, LU Xian-zhui, . Prediction of shield tunneling-induced soil settlement based on self-attention recurrent neural network model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2613-2625.
[9] CUI Ji-fei, WU Zhen-zhen, LI Lin, RAO Ping-ping, . Variable stiffness leveling of old and new pile groups considering soil creep [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1897-1906.
[10] YANG Xiao-hui, ZHAO Zi-yi, GUO Nan, QIAN Bao, ZHU Yan-peng, . Creep characteristics and settlement prediction of transversely isotropic unsaturated loess [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1489-1500.
[11] JIANG Xin-yu, ZHENG Xi-yao, WU Jun, YANG Ai-wu, LI Bo, . Acid resistance performance of geopolymer-stabilized soft clay under HNO3 and H2SO4 acid erosion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 851-866.
[12] WU Xiao-tian, YAO Yang-ping, WEI Ran, CUI Wen-jie. Numerical simulation of soil deformation induced by tunnel construction with unified hardening model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[13] LOU Xu-long, ZHANG Ze-rui, KONG De-qiong, CHEN Xing-chao, ZHU Bin, . Large deformation limit analysis of pipe-soil interaction for heavy pipes in deep water [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[14] GAO Xu, SONG Kun, LI Ling, YAN E-chuan, WANG Wei-ming, . Prediction of consolidation settlement of heterogeneous ground based on iterative co-Kriging inversion method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 761-770.
[15] YANG Yao-hui, XIN Gong-feng, CHEN Yu-min, LI Zhao-feng, . Shaking table test on drainage pile-net composite foundation treated liquefiable subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!