Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3326-3331.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1944

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A method to calculate ultimate bearing capacity of rock foundation with cavities considering load position offset

LEI Yong, DENG Jia-zheng, LIU Ze-yu, LI Jun-jie, ZOU Gen   

  1. Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering Stability Control and Health Monitoring, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
  • Received:2019-11-17 Revised:2020-05-09 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878270).

Abstract: The offset of load position greatly influences the ultimate bearing capacity of the underlying rock foundation with cavities. Based on double logarithmic spiral curve model, the limit analysis method is adopted to establish the underlying rock foundation with cavities damage body function equation when the load position offset is small. Then, the calculation formula of ultimate bearing capacity of hollow rock foundation is deduced. When the offset of load position is large, Prandtl failure mode is developed in the rock foundation with cavities. Furthermore, the influence of the thickness h of rock foundation, load position offset e and internal friction angle ? on the ultimate bearing capacity of rock foundation with cavities are analyzed. Finally, the model test of the ultimate bearing capacity of the rock foundation with cavities under different load position offset and thickness were carried out, and the results were compared and verified with the theory. The results show that when the offset of position is constant, the ultimate bearing capacity of rock foundation increases linearly and the foundation tends to be complete rock foundation with the increase of h. The ultimate bearing capacity of rock foundation with cavities increases non-linearly with the increase of e when h is a certain value. When the h reaches a certain value, the ultimate bearing capacity is close to the value of complete bedrock. When h and e are constant, the limit bearing capacity of the rock foundation with void increases gradually with the increase of the angle of internal friction ?.

Key words: rock foundation with cavities, limit analysis, ultimate bearing capacity, double logarithmic spiral curve, experimental study

CLC Number: 

  • TU 45
[1] LI Xiao-gang, WU Shou-xin, FENG Jun, . Analysis of slide-resistance of vertical subgrade steps for gravity-type anchorages of suspension bridges based on limit analysis theory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2547-2558.
[2] LAN Bin-peng, WANG Yan-ping, WANG Wei-guo, WANG Yi-jun, ZHAO Yue, . Experiment on deformation and working mechanism of the pull-pile supporting structure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 551-562.
[3] YANG Ming-yun, CHEN Chuan, LAI Ying, CHEN Yun-min. Bearing capacity analysis of piggy-backed anchors under three-dimensional loading in clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[4] LOU Xu-long, ZHANG Ze-rui, KONG De-qiong, CHEN Xing-chao, ZHU Bin, . Large deformation limit analysis of pipe-soil interaction for heavy pipes in deep water [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[5] LI Yong-wei, XU Lin-rong, FU Jin-yang, SHANG Yong-hui, . Seepage failure mechanism of railway subgrade filling materials under train loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 299-308.
[6] DAI Bei-bing, YUAN Xin, ZHOU Xi-wen, LIU Feng-tao, . Upper bound limit analysis using smoothed finite element method considering discontinuous velocity field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2849-2858.
[7] SHI Xiu-song, ZHOU Gao-zhang, LIU Lei-lei, . Stability of tunnel face in overconsolidated soil layer based on nonlinear Hvorslev surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
[8] CHEN Guang-bo, TANG Wei, LI Tan, WANG Chuang-ye, WANG Er-yu, ZHANG Guo-hua, . Mechanical response and instability model of fractured coal-rock combined body [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2633-2652.
[9] ZHAO Chong-xi, XU Chao, WANG Qing-ming, ZHANG Sheng, LI Hao-yu, . Centrifuge load test on ultimate bearing capacity of geosynthetic-reinforced soil abutment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1643-1650.
[10] XIONG Gen, FU Dong-kang, ZHU Bin, LAI Ying, . Centrifuge modelling of suction anchor subjected to inclined load in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
[11] SUN Rui, YANG Jun-sheng, ZHANG Qing-he, YANG Feng, . Three-dimensional lower bound finite element limit analysis method for tunnel stability based on adaptive mesh refinement strategy [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1256-1264.
[12] LI Lin, SUN Zhuan-qin. A three-dimensional upper-bound limit analysis of unsaturated embankment considering matric suction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1014-1025.
[13] ZHOU Zhi-xiong, ZHOU Feng-xi, CAO Xiao-lin, WANG Zhen, . Variational limit equilibrium method analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of composite foundation: vertical reinforcement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3748-3754.
[14] FENG Song, ZHENG Ying-ren, GAO Hong, . A new Drucker-Prager criterion for geomaterials under conventional triaxial stress condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 2919-2928.
[15] ZHU Ke-wen, YU Jian, HUANG Mao-song, . Upper bound analysis of uplift piles in saturated clay and soil plug effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(7): 1995-2004.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!