Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 645-654.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0443

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of effective stress method and effective consolidation stress method for strength calculation in preloading ground

TU Yuan1, 2, WANG Kui-hua1, 2, ZHOU Jian1, 2, HU An-feng1, 2   

  1. 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Engineering Research Center of Urban Underground Development Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2019-03-04 Revised:2019-05-14 Online:2020-02-11 Published:2020-02-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778572).

Abstract: The standard formula for calculating the soil shear strength of the preloading ground under anisotropic consolidation is not applicable to isotropic consolidation process. In this paper, a new formula was proposed to calculate the soil shear strength of the preloading ground under isotropic consolidation process. This new formula was derived by analyzing the calculation principle of the two existing fundamental methods, which are effective stress method (ESM) and effective consolidation stress method (ECSM), respectively. Then the results that calculated by the new formula and the standard formula applied to vacuum preloading and vacuum combined surcharge preloading were theoretically discussed and compared. Finally, the applicability of the new formula and the standard formula were tested by the practical engineering, and the difference between the calculated strength and the measured strength were also analyzed. The results show that the ECSM can be applied to the preloading ground under both the isotropic consolidation and the anisotropic consolidation, while standard formula is only applicable to surcharge preloading ground theoretically. The values of soil shear strength of the vacuum preloading and vacuum combined surcharge preloading that calculated by the standard formula are smaller than those calculated by the new formula. The relative difference of the two calculation values only relates to the friction angle and increases as the friction angle increases. In the vacuum combined surcharge preloading treatment project, the shear strength prediction values by the new formulas are closer to the measured values than those by the standard formulas. The result of this study can be potentially helpful for calculating different kinds of preloading grounds in practice.

Key words: preloading ground, shear strength, effective consolidation stress method, effective stress method, vacuum combined surcharge preloading

CLC Number: 

  • TU 431
[1] YANG Xuan-yu, WANG Yong, . Experimental study on shear behavior of regular soil-rock interface considering asperity widths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] FANG Wei, WU Run-feng, ZHOU Chun-mei, . Rankine passive earth pressure of unsaturated soil using envelope shell model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] SHEN Yang, SHEN Jia-yi, LIANG Hui, FAN Ke-wei. Triaxial tests on simulated calcareous sand based on 3D printing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[4] LAO Guo-feng, YANG Jun-sheng, XIE Yi-peng, TANG Chong, XU Zhi-peng, . A peak shear strength model of continuously graded granular soils based on skeleton structure indices [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[5] LUO Zuo-sen, CAO Xu, DENG Hua-feng, YANG Wang, LI Jian-lin, YANG Chao, . Influence of dynamic normal load on shear mechanical properties of limestone joint surface under different water-bearing states [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[6] OUYANG Miao, ZHANG Hong-ri, WANG Gui-yao, DENG Ren-rui, GUO Ou, WANG Lei, GAO You, . Optimization of the ratio of expansive soil improved by biological matrix based on response surface method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[7] CAO Su-nan, LI Chun-hong, CHEN Yuan-bing, FEI Kang, . Shear characteristics of biomimetic sand-structure interface under cyclic loading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[8] WU Xue-zhen, XIA Ya-xin, LI Da-yong, YOU Xian-hui, SHAN Ning-kang, XIAO Zhen-ke, CHEN Xiang, . Experiment on shear strength of inner interface of a new type stiffened deep mixed pile [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[9] WANG Jun, ZHANG Kai-yu, CHEN Sheng-kai, QIN Wei, NI Jun-feng, GAO Zi-yang, ZHANG Yi-fang, . Experimental study on explosive deposition depth affecting soil parameters in explosion replacement method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[10] LIU Ji-fu. A new method for analyzing stability of drainage consolidation embankments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[11] ZHANG Ya-qin, YANG Ping, ZHANG Ting, HAN Lin-liang. Effects of salt content and freeze-thaw conditions on static and dynamic strength characteristics of freeze-thawed chloride silty clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 157-166.
[12] ZHANG Hua-jin, WU Shun-chuan, LI Bing-lei, ZHAO Yu-song, . Uncertainty estimation of rock shear strength parameters based on Gaussian process regression [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[13] ZHU Jun-yu, PEI Li-hua, GUI Yue, . Reconceptualization of the shear strength of organic soils: based on the perception of soil organic matter occurrence forms [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 451-460.
[14] RAN Yu-ling, ZHANG Wen-bo, BAI Wei, KONG Ling-wei, ZHOU Li-na, FAN Heng-hui, . Effect of free iron oxide on shear strength of laterite based on borehole shear test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2573-2582.
[15] FENG Shuai, CHEN Pan, ZHOU Jia-zuo, WEI Chang-fu, . The effect of occurrence environments on the mechanical behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 1987-1999.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!