Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 2001-2008.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0822

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

SHPB tests on dynamic impact behavior of granite residual soil

LIU Xin-yu1, 2, ZHANG Xian-wei1, 3, YUE Hao-zhen1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, XU Chao4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541000, China; 4. Xiamen Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd., Xiamen, Fujian 361000, China
  • Received:2019-05-10 Revised:2019-07-31 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-08-02
  • Contact: 张先伟,男,1982年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事特殊土土力学的基础及工程应用研究。E-mail: xwzhang@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail: lxyucas@outlook.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41672293, 41972285, 51709290), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2018363) and Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (15-KF-02).

Abstract: Split Hopkinson pressure bar tests (SHPB) were carried out to investigate the strength characteristics of granite residual soil under high strain rates comparing to that under common strain rates. Stress-strain curves and strength properties under various strain rates were obtained and found to be strain-softening. The failure strain ?af increased with increasing the strain rate. The increase of ?af was more evident at high strain rates. The peak strength of granite residual soil was found to be rate-dependent, and the peak strength increased linearly with the increase of strain rate, but the fitting relationships under low and high strain rates were different. The coefficient of strain rate sensitivity m was proposed for the quantitative evaluation of the correlation. The results show that the dependence decreases with the increase of strain rate. The value of m at low strain rate is 26.694, while only 0.013 at high strain rate. Judging from the test results, the high-speed impact load is generally harmful to the soil. The research will lead to a deeper understanding of the impact damage mechanism and provide technical guidance for relevant construction.

Key words: impact loading, granite residual soil, split Hopkinson pressure bar, strain rate, strength, coefficient of strain rate sensitivity

CLC Number: 

  • TU449
[1] FU Qiang, YANG Ke, LIU Qin-jie, SONG Tao-tao, WU Ben-niu, YU Peng, . Interface strength characteristics of surrounding rock-lining composite structures under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[2] YANG Xuan-yu, WANG Yong, . Experimental study on shear behavior of regular soil-rock interface considering asperity widths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[3] WU Qian-chan, ZHANG Rong-jun, XU Zhi-hao, YANG Zhao, ZHENG Jun-jie, . Influence of flocculant on strength behavior and deformation characteristics of solidified slurry-like mud [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[4] LIU Jing, WANG Hao, YANG Xin, SU Jin-chen, ZHANG You-liang, . Field test study on reinforcement of tropical soil slope using microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 343-353.
[5] HUANG De-xin, WEN Tao, CHEN Ning-sheng, . Methods for determining residual strength of rock considering energy evolution [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[6] FANG Wei, WU Run-feng, ZHOU Chun-mei, . Rankine passive earth pressure of unsaturated soil using envelope shell model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[7] SHEN Yang, SHEN Jia-yi, LIANG Hui, FAN Ke-wei. Triaxial tests on simulated calcareous sand based on 3D printing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[8] LI Xiao-feng, LI Hai-bo, LIU Li-wang, FU Shuai-yang, . Tensile failure characteristics and mesoscopic mechanism of rocks under impact loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[9] LAO Guo-feng, YANG Jun-sheng, XIE Yi-peng, TANG Chong, XU Zhi-peng, . A peak shear strength model of continuously graded granular soils based on skeleton structure indices [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[10] CAO Yi, RONG Chuan-xin, WANG Yan-sen, CHANG Lei, WANG Bin, . Mechanical response and constitutive modeling of frozen calcareous clay under complex multi-axial stress paths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[11] HU Feng-hui, FANG Xiang-wei, SHEN Chun-ni, WANG Chun-yan, SHAO Sheng-jun, . Experiment on particle breakage, strength, and dilatancy of coral sand under true triaxial conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[12] HUANG Ying-hao, MAO Shuai-dong, ZHANG Juan, WANG Wen-chong, WANG Shuo, . Basic properties of lightweight convection-solidified silt backfill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1700-1708.
[13] LUO Zuo-sen, CAO Xu, DENG Hua-feng, YANG Wang, LI Jian-lin, YANG Chao, . Influence of dynamic normal load on shear mechanical properties of limestone joint surface under different water-bearing states [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[14] NI Zu-jia, QIAO Jiang-mei, ZHANG Jun-kai, TANG Xu-hai, . Determining mechanical property and wave velocity of sandstone by accurate grain-based model and microscale mechanics experiments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
[15] LI Lin, ZHANG Deng-hong, ZHANG Miao, GU Xiao-qiang, XU Long-fei, . Load transfer model of pile-unsaturated loess interface considering hydro-mechanical coupling effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!