Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 245-254.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0578

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Field tests on structural properties of reinforced retaining walls with different panels

NIU Xiao-di1, 2, YANG Guang-qing2, 3, WANG He3, DING Shuo3, FENG Fan3   

  1. 1. School of Traffic and Transportation, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China
  • Received:2020-05-08 Revised:2020-10-09 Online:2021-01-11 Published:2021-01-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51378322, 51709175) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2019208159).

Abstract: Based on the reinforced retaining wall of Chengdu-Kunming railway, the field tests were carried out. The comparison of the reinforced retaining wall with full-height rigid panels, the reinforced retaining wall with modular panel embedded return package structure and the reinforced retaining wall with modular panel within 9 months after the completion of construction were analyzed to study the structural properties. During the test period, two earthquakes occurred and changes of the deformation of retaining wall and the earth pressure were monitored. The results show that the geogrid strain rate, wall compression and wall horizontal displacement can be well controlled by the reinforced retaining wall with full-height rigid panel, showing the best stability and seismic performance. The earth pressure on the back of the reinforced retaining wall with full-height rigid panel and reinforced retaining wall with modular panel are distributed following with a "M" type along the wall height. The distribution of earth pressure on the back of the reinforced retaining wall with modular panel embedded return package structure is similar to "S" along the wall height. The lateral earth pressure coefficients of the reinforced retaining wall with full-height rigid panel change little along the wall height, which are less than the FHWA calculated values. The lateral earth pressure coefficients of the reinforced retaining wall with modular panel embedded return package structure have an increased trend along the wall height. The values of the middle and lower part of the retaining wall are less than the FHWA calculated values, and the values of the upper part are close to or higher than the static earth pressure coefficients. Most of the lateral earth pressure coefficients of the reinforced retaining wall with modular panel are ranging from the FHWA calculation values to the static earth pressure coefficients. The geogrid strains of three retaining walls change nonlinearly along the wall height. The retaining wall compressions increase gradually with the increased time, especially in the first 50 days. Then the increase rates gradually decrease until the coming of the rainy season, the hydraulic effect promotes the increase rates to increase again. After the earthquakes, the earth pressure on the back decreases, the geogrid strain increases, the wall compressions increase and the wall panels have an obvious trend to move out.

Key words: reinforced retaining wall, different panels, structural property, earthquake

CLC Number: 

  • TU 470
[1] FAN Meng, LI Jing-jun, YANG Zheng-quan, LIU Xiao-sheng, ZHU Kai-bin, ZHAO Jian-ming, . Applicability of standard penetration test based liquefaction assessment methods for sandy soil in deep layer [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[2] ZHAO Fei, SHI Zhen-ming, YU Song-bo, ZHOU Yuan-yuan, LI Bo, CHEN Jian-feng, ZHANG Qing-zhao, ZHENG Hong-chao. Research progress on dynamic failure and reinforcement of stratified rock slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[3] QIAN Fa-qiao, DENG Ya-hong, MU Huan-dong, YANG Nan, LIU Fan, WANG Meng-chen, . Seismic stability evaluation method of slope based on wavelet transform and pseudo-dynamic method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 88-96.
[4] ZHU Bin, QI Ji-lin, LI Jiang, YANG Yu-sheng, ZHANG Yi-fan, ZHAO Bo-chao, . Analysis of earthquake subsidence and key influencing factors of earth-rock dam based on seismic damage investigation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 619-630.
[5] XIE Zhou-zhou, ZHAO Lian-heng, LI Liang, HUANG Dong-liang, ZHANG Zi-jian, ZHOU Jing, . Difference of dynamic responses of soil-rock mixture slopes with different rock contents based on shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[6] JIANG De-jun, HUANG Hui-bao, JU Shu-jun, GAO Qiang, JIANG Ming-cheng. Analysis of working behavior of transverse joints and dampers of Dagangshan arch dam during Luding Ms6.8 earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1527-1539.
[7] LI Jin-yu, WANG Wei, WANG Hao-yu, YANG Yan-ke, XU Kai-fang, ZHANG Xiao-qing, XIONG Wen. Influence of liquefaction site conditions under the action of earthquake sequences [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1551-1559.
[8] PENG Jun-guo, HUANG Yu-hao. A new calculation method for the size of anchor plates in unsaturated slope [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[9] SUN Wei, WANG Rui, ZHANG Jian-min, . Numerical simulation for liquefaction-induced shear strain localization based on peridynamics [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 3130-3138.
[10] FENG Hai-zhou, JIANG Guan-lu, HE Zi-lei, GUO Yu-feng, HU Jin-shan, LI Jie, YUAN Sheng-yang, . Dynamic response characteristics of tunnel portal slope reinforced by prestressed anchor sheet-pile wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[11] CUI Kai, GE Cheng-rui, YU Xiang-peng, CHEN Rui, WU Guo-peng, . A preliminary study on the structural characteristics of rammed earth at the site in arid area of Northwest China [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(7): 1937-1948.
[12] ZHANG Cong, FENG Zhong-ju, WANG Fu-chun, KONG Yuan-yuan, WANG Xi-qing, MA Xiao-qian, . Shaking table test of dynamic response of a single pile under different thicknesses of soft soil layers in a strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1100-1110.
[13] WU Hong, YE Zhi, ZHANG Yu-ting, LIU Hua-bei, . Numerical study on seismic behavior of shield tunnel crossing saturated sandy strata with different densities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1204-1216.
[14] XIN Chun-lei, YANG Fei, FENG Wen-kai, LI Wen-hui, LIAO Jun. Shattering failure mechanism of step-like bedding rock slope under multi-stage earthquake excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(12): 3481-3494.
[15] LIANG Xiao-cong, CHEN Ping-shan, LIU ZHI-jun, WANG Yong-zhi, ZHU Ming-xing, . A liquefaction evaluation method for coral sand based on dynamical centrifuge model test verification [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(11): 3173-3181.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!