Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3475-3484.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0626

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

A necessary improvement of the viscoelastic method for calculating the dynamic behaviors of the concrete faced rockfill dams

WEI Kuang-min1, 2, CHEN Sheng-shui1, 2, MA Hong-yu3, LI Guo-ying1, 2, MI Zhan-kuan1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Reservoir Dam Safety of the Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China; 3. Xinjiang Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey Design Institute, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830000, China
  • Received:2021-04-24 Revised:2021-07-22 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R & D Plan(2018YFC1508503), the Basic Scientific Research Funds in National Nonprofit Institutes(Y320004, Y320005) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1765203).

Abstract: At present, the viscoelastic method is widely used in the dynamic analysis of concrete faced rockfill dams (CFRDs), basically forming a method framework: the viscoelastic model for calculating the dynamic response and the permanent deformation model for calculating the permanent deformation. Then the dam safety is evaluated through both the dam dynamic response and the permanent deformation. However, when the current method is used in the dynamic analysis of the CFRDs, there is an obvious defect, i.e., it cannot consider the influence of permanent deformation on the stress of the concrete slab during the strong earthquakes, which may cause serious errors when applying the method in CFRDs with obvious permanent deformation. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the current method. This paper suggests to adopt the strategy of “divide first and combine later”. Firstly, the dynamic displacement and permanent displacement of the dam are calculated separately, then the two are added as the actual displacement of the structure, and finally, the strain and stress of the structure are calculated based on this actual displacement. This paper took the Yulong Kashi CFRD as an example to illustrate the necessity of the improvement.

Key words: CFRD, earthquake analysis, viscoelastic method, finite element method, Yulong Kashi

CLC Number: 

  • TU 45
[1] ZHANG Xian-cheng, CHI Bao-tao, YU Xian-ze, GUO Qian-jian, YUAN Wei, ZHANG Yao-ming, . Unstructured mesh generation and fracture damage analysis in the implementation of peridynamics-based finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 467-476.
[2] ZHANG Chi, DENG Long-chuan, ZHUANG Qian-wei, LI Xiao-zhao, WANG Qiu-ping, QIAO Liang, . Experimental and numerical investigations on rotary rock-breaking force and efficiency of disc cutter [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2995-3006.
[3] CHEN Deng-hong, ZHANG Xin-han, LIU Yun-hui, HU Hao-wen, LIU Yun-long, LIANG Yu-xiang, . Nonlinear seismic response analysis of high arch dam-irregular foundation- reservoir water system based on octree scaled boundary finite element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2586-2599.
[4] ZHANG Jin, LI Shu-heng, ZHU Qi-zhi, SHI Ling-ling, SHAO Jian-fu, . Short- and long-term rock constitutive model and gray sandstone deformation prediction based on deep learning method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 289-302.
[5] HAN Li-bing, LI Wen-tao, WEI Chang-fu, . Application of adaptive time step method to unsaturated seepage flow [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 685-693.
[6] DAI Bei-bing, YUAN Xin, ZHOU Xi-wen, LIU Feng-tao, . Upper bound limit analysis using smoothed finite element method considering discontinuous velocity field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2849-2858.
[7] LI Xiao-long, ZHAO Ze-xin, CHEN Kun-yang, MA Peng, CHEN Can, ZHONG Yan-hui, ZHANG Bei, . Simulation study on polymer compaction fracture grouting considering chemical reactions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2823-2838.
[8] PAN Hong, XU Jia-xian, LUO Guan-yong, PENG Si-ge, CAO Hong, . Simplified analysis method of singular point source in three-dimensional finite element calculation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2483-2491.
[9] MAO Jia, YU Jian-kun, SHAO Lin-yu, ZHAO Lan-hao. Discrete element method based on three dimensional deformable spheropolyhedra [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(3): 908-916.
[10] WANG Gang, DENG Ze-zhi, JIN Wei, ZHANG Jian-min, . Staggered finite element and finite volume method for suffusion simulation based on local conservation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(3): 917-926.
[11] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. Investigation into RFD system for deep excavation considering diaphragm wall joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[12] HUANG Chao, QIAN Jian-gu, . Dynamic response of storage and drainage tunnel in saturated ground under water hammer [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3802-3814.
[13] FENG Song, ZHENG Ying-ren, GAO Hong, . A new Drucker-Prager criterion for geomaterials under conventional triaxial stress condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 2919-2928.
[14] WANG Rui, HU Zhi-ping. Current situation and prospects of 2.5D finite element method for the analysis of dynamic response of railway subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(1): 284-301.
[15] LIU Ying-jing, YANG Jie, ZHU Han-hua, YIN Zhen-Yu. A novel multiphysics modelling approach for grout loss analysis of backfill grouting in highly permeable soils during TBM tunnelling [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(9): 2744-2756.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!