Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1571-1584.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1527

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Probability density function estimation of geotechnical parameters considering the three-dimensional spatial variability based on multi-source site investigation data

YANG Zhi-yong1, YIN Cheng-chuan1, NIE Jia-yan2, LI Xue-you1, QI Xiao-hui3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 3. Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
  • Received:2021-09-08 Revised:2022-03-02 Online:2022-06-21 Published:2022-06-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52109144, 51909288) and the Open Innovation Fund of Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research (CX2020K07).

Abstract: Geotechnical site investigation may obtain the data of multiple soil parameters. These data for different soil parameters are cross-correlated and spatially correlated in the three-dimensional space. How to effectively use these site investigation data to quantify the uncertainties of soil parameters remains a challenging issue. To address this issue, this paper proposes a joint probability density function (PDF) estimation method of geotechnical parameters based on multi-source site investigation data with consideration of the three-dimensional spatial variability of these geotechnical parameters. The paper first briefly reviews the PDF estimation method based on multi-source investigation data at a single sounding that only considers the spatial variability in the vertical direction. The Gibbs sampler-based method is then proposed to estimate the joint PDF of geotechnical parameters based on multi-source site investigation data at multiple soundings by taking the three-dimensional spatial variability of these soil parameters into consideration. A simulated virtual site and a practical site at Texas USA are employed to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method. It is shown that the proposed method can provide an effective tool for uncertainty quantification with multi-source investigation data. Compared with the single sounding method, the proposed method can effectively reduce the statistical uncertainty.

Key words: site investigation, uncertainty, three-dimensional spatial variability, multi-source site investigation data, Gibbs sampler

CLC Number: 

  • TU192
[1] YANG Zhi-yong, DING Yu-chao, LENG Zhen-dong, LIU Zhi-jun, LI Xue-you, . Three-dimensional probabilistic reconstruction of sparse measurement site based on a big data assimilation technique [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1881-1896.
[2] ZHANG Hua-jin, WU Shun-chuan, LI Bing-lei, ZHAO Yu-song, . Uncertainty estimation of rock shear strength parameters based on Gaussian process regression [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[3] XUE Yang, MIAO Fa-sheng, WU Yi-ping, WEN Tao, WANG Yan-kun, . Uncertainty quantification in the parameters of soil constitutive models [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2797-2807.
[4] JIANG Qi-hao, WANG Jin-tong, HOU Bo, ZHANG Dong-ming, ZHANG Jin-zhang, . Bearing capacity of shallow foundations considering geological uncertainty and soil spatial variability [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(11): 3288-3298.
[5] ZHONG Zi-lan, SHI Yue-bo, LI Jin-qiang, ZHAO Mi, DU Xiu-li. Stochastic seismic response analysis of engineering site considering correlations of critical soil dynamic parameters [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 2015-2024.
[6] YU Chong, YUE Hao-zhen, LI Hai-bo, ZHOU Chuan-bo, CHEN Shi-hai, SHAO Zhu-shan, . Analysis of blasting control parameters and reliability based on rock mass quality [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(8): 2239-2249.
[7] TIAN Mi, SHENG Xiao-tao, . Method for determining minimum test data quantity for geotechnical engineering investigation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 400-408.
[8] CHEN Zhuo-shi, YUAN Xiao-ming, SUN Rui, WANG Ke. Impact of uncertainty in in-situ shear-wave velocity on the judgement of site stiffness [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2748-2754.
[9] LI Shu-cai, HE Peng, LI Li-ping, ZHANG Qian-qing, SHI Shao-shuai, XU Fei, LIU Hong-liang. Reliability analysis method of sub-classification of tunnel rock mass and its engineering application [J]. , 2018, 39(3): 967-376.
[10] ZHANG Biao, DAI Xing-guo. A cloud model for predicting rockburst intensity grade based on index distance and uncertainty measure [J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 257-265.
[11] QI Xiao-hui, LI Dian-qing, CAO Zi-jun, TANG Xiao-song, . Uncertainty analysis of slope stability considering geological uncertainty [J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1385-1396.
[12] FANG Yan-bing, SU Yong-hua, XIAO Wang, LIANG Bin. Non-probabilistic reliability model for implicit performance function based on subinterval method [J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1171-1178.
[13] BI Jun, CHEN Wen-wu, . Influence of forms of parameter m and largest matric suction point on the parameters of Van Genuchten model [J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3604-3612.
[14] ZHANG Feng, ZHOU Feng, WANG Xu-dong,. Robust geotechnical design of a single pile under vertical loads in layered soils [J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3311-3318.
[15] XIN Jun-xia, WU Xing-zheng, GAO Wei, REN Guo-jia, MA Jun-xiang, FAN Lei, . Copula-based analysis of load-displacement curves of cement-fly ash-gravel pile [J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 424-434.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!