Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 1899-1912.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2106

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Statistical analysis of karst spatial distribution in Shenzhen

LIU Dong1, 2, LIN Pei-yuan3, 4, CHEN Xian-ying3, 4, HUANG Sheng3, 4, MA Bao-song3, 4   

  1. 1. Shenzhen Comprehensive Geotechnical Engineering Investigation & Design Co.Ltd, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China; 2. Shenzhen Longgang Geology Bureau, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China; 3. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, Guangdong 519080, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China
  • Received:2021-12-14 Revised:2022-04-27 Online:2022-07-26 Published:2022-08-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979254), the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (52008408) and the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515012088).

Abstract: The construction of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is a major national development strategy of China. Shenzhen is a core city in the Greater Bay area. The karst in Shenzhen typically is found in Longgang and Pingshan districts. It has brought great challenges and threats to the underground exploitation and ground construction safety for the city. In this paper, borehole data are first collected from karst geotechnical investigation projects in Shenzhen and from the relevant literature. Based on the data, the spatial features of the karst in Shenzhen are statistically characterized considering strata and rock type, rock stratum depth and burial type, main corrosive indices of the groundwater, depth of the karst caves, thickness of the cave ceiling, cave height, fillings, karst line ratio, karst borehole ratio, and ground karst growth density. Results showed that the karst in Shenzhen is typically buried shallowly, but largely varies as of the spatial features. Statistically, on average the karst cave is about 20 m in depth, 2.5 m to   4 m in height, and mainly half filled with silty clays. On average the karst is about 15% for line ratio, 40% for borehole ratio, and over 300 caves per km2 for the ground karst growth density. Overall, over 90% of the sites are ranked as high in karst development. It is also found that the above karst parameters follow lognormal as well as Weibull distributions. The ceiling thickness tends to be smaller as the rock depth increases for limestone stratum, whereas these two factors are statistically uncorrelated at a significance level of 0.05 for marble stratum. The cave height appears to be statistically independent or positively weakly correlated to rock depth, ceiling thickness, underground corrosive indices, and groundwater table. The findings from this paper provide valuable priori information to risk assessment on karst hazards in Shenzhen. 

Key words: karst geology, Shenzhen, spatial distribution characteristics, statistical analysis

CLC Number: 

  • P 642
[1] CHEN Huai-lin, YANG Tao, RAO Yun-kang, ZHANG Zhe, WU Hong-gang, XIE Jiang-wei, TENG Han-qing. Calculation method of sliding surface stress based on segmented sliding surface stress measurement system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[2] LIU Dong, LIN Pei-yuan, LI Wei-ke, HUANG Sheng, MA Bao-song, . Statistical evaluation of accuracy of cross-hole CT method in identifying karst caves [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(3): 822-834.
[3] SHARAFUTDINOV Rafael. Statistical and regression analyses of sands stiffness in triaxial tests and application of the results [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(10): 2873-2886.
[4] SUN Zhuang-zhuang, MA Gang, ZHOU Wei, WANG Yi-han, CHEN Yuan, XIAO Hai-bin. Influence of particle shape on size effect of crushing strength of rockfill particles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 430-438.
[5] WAN Zhi-hui, DAI Guo-liang, GAO Lu-chao, GONG Wei-ming, . A practical method of calculation of bearing capacity and settlement of large-diameter post-grouting piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(8): 2746-2755.
[6] LUO Shun-tian, YANG Fan-jie, ZHOU Hui, ZHANG Chuan-qing, WANG Xu-hong, LÜ Tao, ZHU Yong, LU Jing-jing, . Multi-index prediction method for maximum convergence deformation of underground powerhouse side wall based on statistical analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(10): 3415-3424.
[7] ZHOU Hai-juan, MA Gang, YUAN Weir, ZHOU Wei, CHANG Xiao-lin, . Size effect on the crushing strengths of rock particles [J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2425-2433.
[8] LIN Jun, CAI Guo-jun, LIU Song-yu, ZOU Hai-feng, . Identification of soil layer boundaries using mechanical layered method base on piezocone penetration test data [J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1413-1423.
[9] LI Gang, ZHANG Jin-li, YANG Qing, . Probabilistically statistical analysis on physico-mechanical indices for sediment soils [J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3565-3572.
[10] ZHUANG Hai-yang, ZHANG Yan-shu, XUE Xu-chao, XU Ye,. Deformation characteristics of narrow-long deep foundation pit for subway station in soft ground and compared with existing statistical results [J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 561-570.
[11] ZHANG Jia-fa, YE Jia-bing, CHEN Jin-song, LI Shao-long . A preliminary study of measurement and evaluation of breakstone grain shape [J]. , 2016, 37(2): 343-349.
[12] WU Qiu-jun, WANG Ming-nian, LIU da-gang. Research on stability of tunnel surrounding rocks based on statistical analysis of on-site displacement monitoring data [J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 359-364.
[13] JING Wen-jun , YANG Chun-he , CHEN Feng. Risk assessment of salt cavern oil/gas storage based on accident statistical analysis [J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1787-1794.
[14] LI Xue-ping, XU Guang-li, WU Qiang, LI Yuan-qing. Application of GIS-based logistic model to karst spatial prognosis studying in Shenzhen universiade center [J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 276-280.
[15] YIN Li-hua, WANG Xiao-mou, ZHANG Liu-jun. Probabilistical distribution statistical analysis of Tianjin soft soil indices [J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 462-469.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!