Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 2550-2567.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.00113

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Investigation of the influence of interaction of wraparound geogrid-sand on load bearing-settlement behavior of strip footing

AHMAD Hussein1, 2, MAHBOUBI Ahmad2, NOORZAD Ali2, HOSEINI MOHAMMAD Hosein2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria; 2. Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
  • Received:2022-03-11 Revised:2022-06-18 Online:2022-09-12 Published:2022-09-12

Abstract: The use of high-quality materials and the strengthening of soil layers, especially in areas with poor bedding, are among the most important factors in stabilizing and achieving the useful life of building structure. An experimental study on a strip footing coated with unreinforced, geogrid-reinforced, and folded geogrid layers of fine sand is presented in this paper. Testing procedures evaluate variables such as the number of planar geogrid layers, the position of the folded geogrid within the soil, the thickness of the geogrid folded layer, the overlap lengths of a folded geogrid, the spacing within folded layers of geogrid, and several layers of geogrid. Compared to planar geogrid reinforced sand, folded geogrid reinforced sand performed better as a result of static loading. In addition, a critical region was found at a certain depth under the footing, where a geogrid folded results in increased footing settlement. This critical area affects the behaviour of sandy soils with low footing widths. Moreover, the results show that the embedment depth and thickness of the folded geogrid are 0.41 and 0.20 of the footing widths, respectively. By increasing the number of folded geogrid layers, the settlement rate is significantly reduced. It was determined that wrapping the reinforced cases around the surrounding frames significantly improved the bearing capacity, reduced settlement, and allowed them to be used in tight spaces.

Key words: geosynthetic, strip footing, geogrid wraparound, geogrid planar, sand, bearing capacity, settlement behaviour

CLC Number: 

  • TU411
[1] WANG Ning-bo, YAO Yang-ping, LIU Lin, LI Xiang-yu, MAO An-qi, LI Ning, . Unified hardending model for sand considering confining pressure effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[2] ZHANG Sheng, BAI Wei, XU Ding-ping, ZHENG Hong, JIANG Quan, LI Zhi-wei, XIANG Tian-bing, . Experimental and theoretical study on sandstone damage evolution under cyclic loading based on acoustic emission and resistivity monitoring [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[3] E Tian-long, CUI Qiang, SUN Zhi-liang, FENG Yang-zhou, LI Bing-zhen, MIAO Dong, YANG Jian, MIAO Tian, . Structure optimization and bearing mechanism of a novel composite foundation incorporating short column-batter piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[4] WANG Chang-hong, CAI De-yong, HU Zi-xuan, YANG Tian-xiao. Uplift mechanism and calculation method of constrained grouting pile under disturbed conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[5] JIN Gui-xiao, LIN Shao-cong, JIANG Qi-wu, HUANG Ming, LI Xi, . Seepage mathematical model of enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation-treated sandy soil based on the Kozeny-Carman equation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[6] XIE Hong-li, ZHOU Zhi-jun, REN Yu-bo, TIAN Ye-qing, FAN Jing-can. Horizontal bearing performance of large-diameter prestressed reinforced concrete pipe pile group [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[7] ZHANG Yu-kun, ZHANG Heng, LI Da-yong, XIANG Qian, . Influence of spudcan penetration and extraction on motion behavior and lateral bearing capacity of adjacent suction caisson [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[8] SHEN Yang, SHEN Jia-yi, LIANG Hui, FAN Ke-wei. Triaxial tests on simulated calcareous sand based on 3D printing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[9] SONG Wei-tao, ZHANG Pei, DU Xiu-li, LIN Qing-tao, . Influence of soil property on ground response during construction of shallow shield tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[10] CHEN Zhi-bo, CHEN Feng, WENG Yang, CAO Guang-wei, ZENG Xu-ming, PAN Sheng-gui, YANG Hui, . Calculation method for vertical bearing capacity of large-diameter steel pipe piles considering the soil plugging effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[11] LEI Rui-de, GU Qing-heng, HU Chao, HE Pei, ZHOU Lin-sen, . Acoustic emission signal characteristics and precursory recognition of rock failure in fractured sandstone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[12] FAN Meng, LI Jing-jun, YANG Zheng-quan, LIU Xiao-sheng, ZHU Kai-bin, ZHAO Jian-ming, . Applicability of standard penetration test based liquefaction assessment methods for sandy soil in deep layer [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[13] CHEN Jia-rui, FAN Bao-yun, YE Jian-hong, ZHANG Chun-shun, . Particle breakage and its evolution model of calcareous sand through triaxial tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2095-2105.
[14] HU Feng-hui, FANG Xiang-wei, SHEN Chun-ni, WANG Chun-yan, SHAO Sheng-jun, . Experiment on particle breakage, strength, and dilatancy of coral sand under true triaxial conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[15] ZHU Xian-xiang, ZHANG Qi, MA Jun-peng, WANG Yong-jun, MENG Fan-zhen, . Diffusion mechanism of seepage grouting in water-bearing sand layer under slurry-water replacement effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!