Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 607-615.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0170

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Slope stability analysis method based on compressive strength reduction of rock mass

ZHANG Wen-lian1, 2, SUN Xiao-yun2, 3, CHEN Yong2, JIN Shen-yi1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China
  • Received:2021-01-29 Revised:2021-06-11 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-10
  • Supported by:
    This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province(F2019210243).

Abstract:

In the rock slope stability analysis methods, the strength reduction method based on nonlinear Hoek-Brown criterion has some problems, such as the disunity of reduction schemes or the complexity of calculation. To solve this problem, a generalized Hoek-Brown criterion strength reduction method based on the compressive strength of rock mass is developed, which can better reflect the physical significance of strength attenuation than the direct reduction of material parameters. Based on the uniaxial compressive strength of rock mass, the uniaxial compressive strength of intact rock sci and the parameters’ combination sa (s and a are empirical parameters of rock mass) are reduced by the same ratio, the reduction ratios of shear strength and the tensile strength are analyzed, and the factor of safety is defined based on the average shear strength. The proposed method is applied to the stability analysis of two classical slope examples, and the factor of safety and critical sliding surface obtained are compared with the local linearized strength reduction method and the limit equilibrium method. The results show that the factor of safety obtained by the proposed method is close to that obtained by the other two methods for two examples, and the relative error is less than 2%. In example 1, the location of the critical sliding surface obtained by the proposed method is in good agreement with the results of the other two methods. In example 2, the critical sliding surface of the proposed method is closer to that of the local linearization method, and can reflect both shear and tensile failures. The above results verify the reliability and rationality of the proposed strength reduction scheme and the definition method for factor of safety.

Key words: strength reduction method, slope stability analysis, generalized Hoek-Brown criterion, factor of safety, critical sliding surface

CLC Number: 

  • TU457
[1] JIANG Yi-jian, LI Huan-huan, ZHU Da-yong, LING Dao-sheng. A linear programming model for slope considering thrust line position and limit equilibrium upper and lower bound solutions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[2] SUN Wen-chao, WANG Jun-hao, XU Wen-jie, DONG Xiao-yang, REN He, WANG Hong-bing, ZHANG Xue-jie, WANG Heng-wei, . Stability and disaster dynamics analysis of highway debris dump site based on material point method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 991-1000.
[3] ZHANG Zhen-bo, LI Bing-xin, YANG Qian, LIU Zhi-chun, LIU Yi, . Instability mode of limited soil in adjacent foundation pit engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[4] LIU Wei, XU Chang-jie, DU Hao-dong, ZHU Huai-long, WANG Chang-hong. Stability analysis of overconsolidated unsaturated red clay slope based on modified UH model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1233-1241.
[5] YI Qi, SUN Guan-hua, YAO Yuan-feng, GUI Ben, SHANG Hao-liang, JI Wen-dong, . Stability analysis of overlying rock mass of lined rock caverns for compressed air energy storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3523-3532.
[6] HUA Cheng-ya, YAO Lei-hua. Unity of three types of energy catastrophe criteria for slope failure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 603-611.
[7] CAO Jia-qi, WANG Hong-xin, WANG Ping, SUN De-an, . A method for evaluating safety of civil air defense structure based on load structure method and strength reduction method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(7): 2105-2114.
[8] ZHANG Wen-gang, WANG Qi, LIU Han-long, CHEN Fu-yong, . Influence of rock mass spatial variability on probability of tunnel roof wedge failure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(5): 1462-1472.
[9] LU Feng, QIU Wen-ge, . A multiparameter non-proportional shear strength reduction method for slope stability analysis based on energy evolution theory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 547-557.
[10] YAN Qi-wei, LI Xin-po, HE Si-ming, LUO Yu, TIAN Hong-ling, WU Yong, . Experimental study of self-healing of slip zone soil in typical red bed landslide [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(9): 3041-3048.
[11] ZHANG Tian-long, ZENG Peng, LI Tian-bin, SUN Xiao-ping, . System reliability analyses of slopes based on active-learning radial basis function [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(9): 3098-3108.
[12] ZHOU Qiang, LI Kang-ping, DUAN Ya-hui, CAO Zi-jun, LI Dian-qing, . Safety criteria for bearing capacity of foundation based on the generalized reliability ratio of safety margin [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[13] LI Jian, CHEN Shan-xiong, YU Fei, JIANG Ling-fa, DAI Zhang-jun. Discussion on mechanism of reinforcing high and steep slope with prestressed anchor cable [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[14] HAN Tong-chun, LIN Bo-wen, HE Lu, SU Yu-qin, . Three-dimensional slope modelling method and its stability based on coupled GIS and numerical simulation software [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2855-2865.
[15] YU Guo, XIE Mo-wen, ZHENG Zheng-qin, QIN Shi-he, DU Yan, . Research on slope stability calculation method based on GIS [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!