Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 2967-2978.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0787

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Pull-out test study on mechanical characteristics of geogrid-aggregate interface

YAN Mu-han1, 2, 3, LING Xian-zhang3, TANG Liang3, XIAO Hong1, SONG Xu-guo2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. China Railway Design Corporation, Tianjin 300308, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150090, China
  • Received:2023-06-12 Accepted:2023-07-24 Online:2023-10-13 Published:2023-10-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Development Project of China Railway Design Corporation (2022A02538015), the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFE0205100), the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41731288).

Abstract: Geogrids are often used in the aggregate cushion of the composite foundation to limit the lateral displacement and reduce the differential deformation. It depends on the interaction between geogrids and aggregate particles. In this study, a series of large-size pull-out tests was performed on bi-axial and tri-axial geogrids embedded in aggregates with three particle-size gradations. The test results showed that higher normal stress, better gradation and more suitable aggregate particle sizes yielded the increase of the pull-out resistance. The classic punching-shear failure model was proven to be valid for explaining the shear effect between transverse ribs of bi-axial geogrids and the aggregate layer during the pull-out process. The bearing resistance of oblique ribs of tri-axial geogrids can also be calculated based on this theory, as long as the effective length of the oblique rib is calculated in a reasonable manner. Furthermore, an empirical method was proposed to calculate the peak pull-out resistance of the extruded geogrid embedded in the aggregate considering the sizes of apertures and aggregates, and interlock effect. The concept of key particles was proposed in this paper to measure how well the apertures of geogrids match the size of the particles. This may help designers choose the type of geogrids and improve the reinforcement effect.

Key words: bi-axial geogrid, tri-axial geogrid, aggregate, interlock effect, pull-out test

CLC Number: 

  • U213.1
[1] WU Jun, MIN Yi-fan, ZHENG Xi-yao, HAN Chen, NIU Fu-jun, ZHU Bao-lin, . Compressive deformation properties of recycled fine aggregates prepared by geopolymer-stabilized sludge method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[2] TAN Yun-zhi, WU Xian-qiao, WU Jun, MING Hua-jun, WANG Chong, XIAO Yu, . Physical and mechanical properties of solidified sludge regulation with phosphogypsum-based aggregate [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1667-1677.
[3] CHANG Jian-mei, TIAN Shi-long, LI Xiang, FENG Huai-ping, KUVANDIK Lesov, . Dynamic shear performance and meso-effect of railway ballast improved with tire-derived aggregate of different shapes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 721-728.
[4] DENG Zhi-xing, XIE Kang, LI Tai-feng, WANG Wu-bin, HAO Zhe-rui, LI Jia-shen, . A novel method for quality control of vibratory compaction in high-speed railway graded aggregates based on the embedded locking point of coarse particles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1835-1849.
[5] WANG Chao-hui, WEN Peng-hui, SONG Liang, NIU Liang-liang, XI He, . Gradation composition design of salt rock aggregate base based on particle breakage characteristics [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 340-352.
[6] DU Wei, NIE Ru-song, LI Lie-lie, TAN Yong-chang, ZHANG Jie, QI Yan-lu, . Discrete element simulation on aeolian sand-geogrid pull-out test with different boundary conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1849-1862.
[7] HUANG Wei, JIAN Wen-bin, YANG Jian, DOU Hong-qiang, LUO Jin-mei, . Prototype test and load transfer characteristic analysis of multi-disk anchor rod [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(2): 520-530.
[8] LI Shui-jiang, TONG Yan-guang, WANG Jun, YING Meng-jie, LIU Fei-yu, . Cyclic shear properties of gravel-geogrid interface under bidirectional cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 291-298.
[9] WANG Jia-quan, QI Hang-xiang, LIN Zhi-nan, TANG Yi, . Pull-out test on geosynthetic reinforced sand based on digital image analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(12): 3259-3269.
[10] FENG Zhong-ju, JIANG Guan, ZHAO Rui-xin, LONG Hou-sheng, WANG Zheng-bin, ZHANG Zheng-xu, . Study on pre-stress long term loss of anchor cable considering coupled multiple factors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(8): 2215-2224.
[11] YANG Jian, JIAN Wen-bin, HUANG Wei, HUANG Cong-hui, LUO Jin-mei, LI Xian-zhong, . Pull-out test and ultimate bearing capacity calculation of grouting branch-type anchor [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 1126-1132.
[12] CHEN Cheng, DUAN Yong-da, RUI Rui, WANG Lun. Study of single and two-layer geogrid reinforced ballasted trackbed using pull-out test and discrete element method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 954-962.
[13] CHEN Xiao-bin, YANG Ning-yu, ZHU Yu, ZHANG Jun-qi, QIAO Shi-fan, . Investigation on stress-strain relationship of TDA-graded aggregate mixtures in large-scale triaxial test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 921-931.
[14] TAN Yun-zhi, ZHAN Shao-hu, SHEN Ke-jun, ZUO Qing-jun, MING Hua-jun, . Effects of hardening and intergranular cementation on the surface of treated aggregate laterite [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 361-368.
[15] TAN Yun-zhi, ZHAN Shao-hu, HU Yan, CAO Ling, DENG Yong-feng, MING Hua-jun, SHEN Ke-jun, . Behavior of lime-laterite interaction and anti-erosion mechanism of Metakaolin [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(1): 104-112.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!