Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 3059-3070.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0578

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles    

Centrifuge modelling and numerical analysis on underwater two-way vacuum preloading

HU Li-wen1, 2, HONG Yi3, WANG De-yong1, 2   

  1. 1. CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute, Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China; 2. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, Guangdong 519082, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310056, China
  • Received:2023-05-09 Accepted:2023-07-10 Online:2023-10-13 Published:2023-10-16

Abstract: Underwater two-way vacuum preloading not only reduces more excess pore water pressure comparing to conventional vacuum preloading with vacuum acting only on the top face, but also has the advantage of utilizing the effective load from the overlying water. However, two-way vacuum preloading is currently only applied in the treatment of dredged soil, thus the mechanism and performance of consolidation of two-way vacuum preloading are hardly studied. To explore the consolidation characteristics and efficiency of underwater two-way vacuum preloading, centrifuge modelling has been performed to simulate soft soil subjected to underwater two-way vacuum preloading in collaboration with group sand drains and single sand drain. The finite element method is also used to analyze and compare the results with those from centrifuge modelling test. Variation of pore water pressure and development of deformation are compared. Meanwhile, changes in total head of pore water and stress path of soil element, as well as degree of consolidation are discussed and evaluated. It is found that more effective load can be obtained from underwater two-way vacuum preloading comparing to conventional vacuum preloading, and the rate of consolidation is larger and the ultimate settlement can be reduced in group sand drains zone comparing with single sand drain zone. The stresses for soil in the center of treated zone follow a path close to K0 line. Under the combination effects of vacuum and gravity, the reduction of pore water pressure at the bottom layer is larger than that at the top layer, and it is found that a lower water head exists at the bottom at final consolidation stage in this experiment. These findings may enhance the understanding and practical application for two-way vacuum preloading.

Key words: two-way vacuum preloading, underwater ground, centrifuge modelling, numerical analysis, consolidation

CLC Number: 

  • TU447
[1] DENG Qi-ning, CUI Yu-long, WANG Jiong-chao, ZHENG Jun, XU Chong, . ChatGPT-assisted programming approach for three-dimensional slope stability calculation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] BAO Shu-feng, DONG Zhi-liang, MO Hai-hong, ZHANG Jin-wen, YU Li-ting, LIU Pan, LIU Xiao-qiang, HOU Ming-xun, . Calculation of static batch settlement and low-pressure consolidation settlement of suspended and fluid mud [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[3] YANG Ai-wu, CHENG Shu-xiao, LIANG Zhen-zhen, HUA Qian-qian, YANG Shao-peng. Combined effects of large-strain consolidation and creep in high-moisture dredger fill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[4] NI Rui-si, XIAO Shi-guo, WU Bing, LIANG Yao, . Analytical solution for consolidation of saturated soft clay under vacuum preloading with non-sand drainage system considering nonlinear drain resistance [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[5] ZHOU Bo-han, ZHANG Wen-li, WANG Dong, . Numerical study of ball penetrometer for predicting strength of overconsolidated soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[6] XU Bin, CHEN Ke-hao, PANG Rui, . Dilatancy equation and bounding surface model of over-consolidated clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[7] FARHAD Jamil, ZENG Chang-nü, MA Yuan, SHARAFAT Ali. Effect of initial consolidation inclination on strain development in saturated silty soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
[8] CHEN Huai-lin, YANG Tao, RAO Yun-kang, ZHANG Zhe, WU Hong-gang, XIE Jiang-wei, TENG Han-qing. Calculation method of sliding surface stress based on segmented sliding surface stress measurement system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[9] ZHAN Run-tao, YIN Xiao-meng , . Identification of consolidation model parameters using spatiotemporally varying pore water pressure measurements [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3315-3328.
[10] SUN Hong-lei, XU Zhen-kai, LIU Si-jie, CAI Yuan-qiang, . Large strain consolidation calculation for slurries under vacuum preloading considering the development process of soil column [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[11] GUO Xiao-gang, MA Lei, ZHANG Chao, GAN Shu-cheng, WANG Hua, GAN Yi-xiong, ZHOU Tong, . A method for controlling heightening rate and slope stability of waste dumps with soft soil base [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 596-606.
[12] GAO Xu, SONG Kun, LI Ling, YAN E-chuan, WANG Wei-ming, . Prediction of consolidation settlement of heterogeneous ground based on iterative co-Kriging inversion method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 761-770.
[13] XU Bao-long, LU Meng-meng, LIU Yuan-jie, ZHANG Xin-yan. Analytical model and solutions for consolidation of composite foundation with multiple types of drains [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 73-83.
[14] LIU Ji-fu. A new method for analyzing stability of drainage consolidation embankments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[15] SHI Xiu-song, ZHOU Gao-zhang, LIU Lei-lei, . Stability of tunnel face in overconsolidated soil layer based on nonlinear Hvorslev surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!