Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 443-448.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1694

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Theoretical study on the penetration resistance coefficient of bucket foundation

LI Ya-zhou1, 2, LI Sen1, 2   

  1. 1. China Communication Construction Corporation Third Harbor Engineering Corporation Limited, Shanghai 200032, China; 2. China Communication Construction Corporation Key Laboratory of Structural Engineering, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Received:2022-10-28 Accepted:2022-12-16 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-19

Abstract: Bucket foundation has promising application prospects in offshore engineering. The calculation of penetration resistance is essential to such foundation installation feasibility analysis. The relationship between the calculation methods of penetration resistance of bucket foundation based on soil strength index and cone penetration resistance is established through theoretical derivation. For clay, the side wall penetration resistance coefficient can be determined by the ratio of cohesion factor to resistance coefficient of cone tip; and the tip penetration resistance coefficient can be determined by the ratio of strip foundation bearing capacity coefficient to resistance coefficient of cone tip. For sand, the side wall penetration resistance coefficient is in proportion to the lateral pressure coefficient and interface friction coefficient, and in inverse proportion to the foundation shape factor and surcharge bearing capacity factor; and the tip penetration resistance coefficient is the reciprocal of the foundation shape factor. The theoretical values of penetration resistance coefficient determined by the geological conditions of the North Sea are close to the empirical values, which provides a theoretical basis for the penetration resistance coefficient. According to the geological conditions of seabed in China, the penetration resistance coefficient is also studied.

Key words: bucket foundation, penetration resistance, shear strength parameter, cone penetration test

CLC Number: 

  • TU 476
[1] LAI Feng-wen, LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, LU Tai-shan, LI Hong-jiang, DUAN Wei, . An analytical approach to determine wall deflections of a deep excavation based on in-situ piezocone penetration test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[2] WU Dun, SUN Lin, LU Jian-wei, YU Bing-kun, CAI Guo-jun, . Research advances in in-situ characterization techniques for Martian soil and prospects for piezocone penetration test application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2308-2324.
[3] CHEN Zhi-bo, CHEN Feng, WENG Yang, CAO Guang-wei, ZENG Xu-ming, PAN Sheng-gui, YANG Hui, . Calculation method for vertical bearing capacity of large-diameter steel pipe piles considering the soil plugging effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[4] WANG Xin-long, NIE Li-qing, CAI Guo-jun, ZHANG Ning, ZHAO Ze-ning, LIU Xue-ning, SONG Deng-hui, . Evaluation of liquidity index based on SVR optimization algorithm using piezocone penetration test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 645-653.
[5] ZHANG Hua-jin, WU Shun-chuan, LI Bing-lei, ZHAO Yu-song, . Uncertainty estimation of rock shear strength parameters based on Gaussian process regression [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[6] WANG Kuan-jun, LIU Bin, MO Pin-qiang, LI Guo-yao, ZHU Qi-yin, SHEN Kan-min, HU Jing, . Computational model of CPTu considering temperature effect and drainage state of silt [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1731-1742.
[7] ZHANG Si-yu, LI Zhao-yan, YUAN Xiao-ming, . Comparison and validation of cone penetration test-based liquefaction evaluation methods [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1517-1526.
[8] SUN Mao-jun, XIE Ya-nan, WANG Dong, . Large deformation simulation of pore pressure dissipation during penetration of piezoncone in structured soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(11): 3416-3422.
[9] WANG Kuan-jun, SHEN Kan-min, WANG Ming-yuan, WANG Hong-yu, GUO Zhen, . Strength interpretation parameter of piezoncone penetration test for soft clay in offshore area of Hangzhou Bay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 521-532.
[10] ZHU Jian-min, ZHENG Jian-guo, YU Yong-tang, CAI Jing, XIA Hui, . Development and engineering application of a new electronically controlled borehole shear instrument [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 687-697.
[11] YANG Yang, TIAN Ying-hui, ZHANG Chun-hui, WANG Rong, WANG Zhi-chao, WANG Le, . Penetration resistance evolution characteristics and mesoscopic mechanism of submarine pipeline in sandy seabed [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1001-1008.
[12] ZHOU Hang, WU Han, ZENG Shao-hua, . Closed-form solution for cavity expansion in sand based on strain gradient plasticity [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(3): 757-770.
[13] WANG Ming-yuan, SUN Ji-zhu, WANG Yong, YANG Yang, . The state-dependent bounding surface model calibration based on CPTu data [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(11): 3280-3287.
[14] WANG Kuan-jun, JIA Zhi-yuan, SHEN Kan-min, TANG Yan. Joint laboratory and in-situ calibration of strength characteristics for Taizhou coastal soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(10): 2851-2859.
[15] YUAN Yu, LIU Run, FU Deng-feng, SUN Guo-dong. Secondary development and application of structural marine clay damage model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 1989-2002.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!